MB Civil Trial: JK/KK Contempt of Court?

[smoofox]

@hut-ho78

@OntheFnce

@eggbutt

See, this is a shining example of why some posters should be ignored. What an asinine post.

Exactly…and some clearly suffer from Dunning-Kruger effect.

As compared to the ad hominem arguments of personal attack when shown to be mistaken. Y’all ran out of facts long ago and went right back to attacking and making up motives and relations of other posters.

That there ^ is a classic example of irony.

I do not have a robe and I am far too cynical and persnickety to be a member of any mob…

[hut-ho78]

@trubandloki

@hut-ho78

@trubandloki

@hut-ho78

and gather evidence. They did so in such a manner as to have the best outcome for everyone.

Because gathering evidence to show what actually happened is not important. Got it. You have made it clear that in your opinion the truth is not important.

They gathered enough. Circumstantial evidence and control of the handgun matter. The jury heard enough to form a verdict which stated the prosecutor proved the act beyond a reasonable doubt. The insanity just took a preponderance.

That is not how it works, that is not how any of this works.

They are supposed to gather all the evidence. Not just what makes their pre-decided case work.
Like, GSR, fingers prints, etc. Look in the various vehicles. Look all the various places they let Rob/Jim wander off on his own.
Heck, if one cop checked Michael and managed to not find a full clip on him that either (because there are two stories going around here as fact) it was found in the backseat where Michael was or put in the back of a car by some random officer who checked Michael later on…that shows that they did not do enough.
It is NOT ok for the police to just grab some evidence.

I am floored that anyone, on any side of the matter is happy with the police work here.

There aren’t two stories if you listen again to Heymer, Wurtenberg, and Hensley. Day 1 and Day 5.

Heymer checked MB for weapons and threw the cleared handgun away from him. Hensley found the magazine shortly thereafter when he patted him down and put it in the “trunk” of Fellini’s patrol car. Wurtenberg retrieved the handgun from where Heymer had tossed it and placed it in the “back” of Fellini’s next to a magazine.

Heymer and Wurtenberg cuffed MB. Wurtenberg cuffed RG as soon as RG placed Rosie just inside the door as he was agitated at realizing LK was so injured.

[Maria]

Can I please join? I just selected a brand new robe. My old stand-by, red with black Scottie dogs on it just didn’t seem good enough. Although it is elderly like me.

[ekat]

@hut-ho78

Just a majority and we have means, motive, and opportunity

All of which are irrelevant in a personal injury case.

[hut-ho78]

@ekat

@hut-ho78

Just a majority and we have means, motive, and opportunity

All of which are irrelevant in a personal injury case.

I don’t think so. That would not agree with your stance that the acts must be proven all over again. Of course only proven by a simple majority not beyond a reasonable doubt. Easier burden for Nagel plus full disclosure all parties.

[ekat]

@hut-ho78

I don’t think so. That would not agree with your stance that the acts must be proven all over again. Of course only proven by a simple majority not beyond a reasonable doubt. Easier burden for Nagel plus full disclosure all parties.

Ok, thank you for your input. Let me know if you want me to explain the elements of a civil suit again, and why the plaintiff having the duty to prove the cause of her injury has nothing to do with “means, motive, and opportunity.”

Also - once again, preponderance of the evidence works both ways.

[KurPlexed]

Thank you for the correction. Is that SOP? I’ve never been involved in a criminal trial so I have no idea. I’m a new elderly illegal mob member so I guess I have some catching up to do with the illegal activities.

Why is the mob, illegal again?

[Angela_Freda]

@ekat

Mitigating her losses would have been leaving when it was abundantly clear she was no longer welcome, instead of ratcheting up the pressure on everyone on the farm

She posted on Facebook and other SM how she was in danger, that she overheard a murder plot, but sat tight…

So many opportunities available to her, between those and that 911 call…

Her idea of mitigating a bad situation and mine are very different.

[ekat]

@KurPlexed

Thank you for the correction. Is that SOP? I’ve never been involved in a criminal trial so I have no idea. I’m a new elderly illegal mob member so I guess I have some catching up to do with the illegal activities.

It is pretty standard in the criminal trial. An alleged victim never has to sit for an interview with the defense.

The defense can ask for prosecution witness interviews, but the witnesses don’t have to comply.

[trubandloki]

@EADoug

Now you’ve all gone and changed your pics. How am I going to keep you all straight??!?!

I am having the same problem. Heck, I did not even recognize my own posts.

[ekat]

@KurPlexed

Why is the mob, illegal again?

I think, but I could be wrong, it had to do with all those shovels and things in our cars.

[Sdel]

Going back to the status update on the 4th. Could the judge be giving the parties one more opportunity to comply/agree before the decision comes in and someone gets ripped a new one?

[MorganSercu]

I got mine from a catalog. It is my future bathrobe.

side-eyes husband

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@eggbutt

See, this is a shining example of why some posters should be ignored. What an asinine post.

Tell me about it.
Geez.
I should follow your lead. Stupid me for reading their posts and think it would contain anything but more made up stuff stacked on top of the previous made-up stuff.

Edit to add - I get it now. CH is just reminding us that they too are of the mindset that it is OK for the police to gather only the evidence that supports their theory at the time and that it is OK for them to ignore everything else that might suggest or support that something else happened there. Got it.

Re bolded. That is not my opinion or my “mindset”.

Please stick to stating your own opinions rather than trying to attribute creative straw man opinions to me.

You must be on your tenth bale of straw already. Please leave some for the horses.

[trubandloki]

@Angela_Freda

Well, considering the police work done, its believable.

I wish I could like this post more than once!!!

[eggbutt]

Of course!

[MHM]

@jvanrens

@Jealoushe

@Omgitsme

I will be anazed if I wake up and this thread hasn’t been shut down

It’s still open

I’m guessing everyones ignores are off ignore now

Since ignored posters comments show up in replies that are quoted, it would be hard to tell, unless you really want to spend that much energy memorizing who has who(m?) on ignore. Personally it’s too much like work to me.

I have only just started using the ignore feature, which I absolutely love. But for me, most of the time, the quoted replies are not visible. The reply shows up with the name of the quoted poster, but then the quote is not shown unless I click on the little arrow to reveal it.

But then once in a while, the quotes do show up. So I’m not sure what’s up with that.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

“Score Points”? This is a game now? Score points with whom? The Kanareks? The invisible trolling public? The Illegal Elderly Mob?

Anyone know why Ignore stopped working within the past 30 minutes?

LOL. So funny that Ignore works flawlessly for me and is so glitchy for you.

[KurPlexed]

@CurrentlyHorseless

brilliant defense lawyer

Wow. We agree on more than I thought. You’re alright in my book!

[ekat]

@Warmblood1

I have extended an invite to the Dude who is also a connoisseur of the bath robe

The Dude Abides.