MB Civil Trial: JK/KK Contempt of Court?

I think there are an awful lot more people wondering exactly the same things than there are taking what little (if any!) credible evidence there was to “prove” otherwise.

17 Likes

Apparently New Jersey is a politically “special” place, and has been for a long time. Christie’s highway “move” was blatant political corruption. :grin:

Difficult to imagine that lesser ranked N.J. politicians or appointed judges are likely to stick to the rule of law, especially if Christie is an example of the nature of N.J. politicos. I hope I am proved wrong but not holding my breath. :wink:

Sunlight often disinfects. Give it a go you folks close by, let the local papers know how you feel. Astonishing enough, “Letters to the Editor” are still a thing. :blush:

Nice that Bruce is there for his very talented horsey Olympic medal winning daughter. Good dad! Beautiful rider is Jessica.
Love the “Boss” and Fallon. A good sense of humor, especially when it is in regards to politics, goes a long way in my opinion. :+1:

11 Likes

Please note she did not report this to the appropriate law enforcement agency, as she was required to do by the state and by SafeSport. Which completely undermines the claim IMO.

Presumably this may also be part of the civil case and it’s an ongoing bad look for LK.

31 Likes

5’6” man
5’2” woman
6’4” man known to have possession of gun who threw his girlfriend and DCPP employee out of his office to open the safe to retrieve the gun, load the gun, drive to the house

All of the evidence whether it be circumstantial, possession, forensic, is that MB shot LK. Means, motive, opportunity.

No evidence shows any other scenario. No evidence presented of self defense. No evidence anyone else had a weapon.

Both men were handcuffed and searched at the scene. RG was handcuffed after placing Rosie in the house but testimony showed he did not cross the threshold to do so.

MB was proven to have shot LK twice in a criminal court of law beyond a reasonable doubt. He was then proven insane by a preponderance of evidence. The insanity does not take away his civil liability and all that is needed to prove he caused her injuries in a civil trial is a preponderance of evidence.

He had longstanding depression, a recent divorce and property settlement, loss of his barn and business manager, 8-9 concussions, he was adjusting to a new girlfriend, his living quarters were damaged in a freeze, cash flow problems (not wealth), was carrying almost 20 sales horses as overhead. He had lots of stress prior to taking on a difficult client.

They were a bad match for each other but she nearly died and he did not follow through to evict her even in a state with a 3 day eviction rule for disorderly conducts and with plenty of disorderly conduct to post as reason.
Mediated to add that the SS report and testimony about the same by the DCPP employee was for verbal non-sexual abuse. LK specified bullying.

1 Like

I would assume that if the mediation thing went in a direction that the Kanarek family could even slightly gloat about it, @Inigo-montoya would be posting here all about it. At least that is what Jonathan Kanarek has historically done.

I have no doubt that they will find two words that they can put together and turn into something that they will then imply says the whole thing says Michael is horrible and Lauren is ever so precious.

@Danvers, I LOVE your robe.
Where is that robe available?

Yes, this is a pretty common bunch of theories that I think many people here think are very possible.

@MorganSercu, thank you for the screen shot. That clearly says sexual abuse of children and the Yes does not distinguish that is not sexual abuse of children like other posters are insisting happened.

19 Likes

Other than two individuals here, is there anyone who can play devil’s advocate and site proof showing support of LK story?

Honestly I’ve thought about it and there isn’t one scintilla of evidence proving what happened that day, including throwing people out of his office to get the gun. Why this is so frigging difficult for some mudstickers to even consider is mind-boggling. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE (PROOF) OF WHAT HAPPENED 8/7/19 OTHER THAN FINISH THE BASTARD.

23 Likes

Well, Morgan just posted up thread that there is proof that Lauren Kanarek’s complaint to SS did include sexual misconduct. So there is that.
I am not saying there was sexual misconduct, just that Lauren’s complaint included it with that Yes answer to that question.

15 Likes

Where are you getting this info from? LK complained to SS about “verbal abuse” towards her, but regarding minors - and 48 Hours showed a copy of this - she answered yes to concerns about physical or sexual abuse of children.

25 Likes

So you are saying because she reported sexual abuse to SS is proof we should believe LK’s twisted ninja story? I don’t understand the undying support and constant arguing about minutia because some fall on their dressage whip defending Lauren and her stories.

By the way, has anyone noticed the round and round about whether IM is JK abruptly stopped? I wonder what made those folks finally believe what most of us knew from the first post? Someone upthread excused JK from being knowledgeable because he wasn’t a “criminal attorney”. One would think knowing what a subpoena is and the requirements of responding would be covered in Law 101. But I don’t know what law school he went to.

13 Likes

Um, I am saying that there is now posted proof that they are not supporting/saying what Lauren actually did, they are making up things and stating them as facts, incorrect facts and that Morgan just so nicely posted some proof that their latest attempt at - Lauren did not do anything wrong - has been proven just as wrong.

21 Likes

He’s been a good horse show dad for a very long time.

I remember seeing him at a show with her back when she was still a pony rider. He even had a naughty Jack Russell with him, very properly on a leash. :slight_smile:

19 Likes

I so appreciate people who keep their dogs on leashes, particularly at busy venues where anything can and may happen.

14 Likes

The funniest part is that I was so busy watching the dog, who was not very leash broke, that I almost did not notice who was holding her. Lol.

19 Likes

No new filings posted overnight. Still holding on the 9/16 filings.

13 Likes

Thank you @DownYonder, for checking the site for us!

5 Likes

Gotcha and I agree 100000%!

4 Likes

I’m quite amused by the fact the robed mobsters keep getting it right and the LK Sympathizers (past and present) keep getting it wrong. Bigly wrong.

I’m amused that the only subpoenas for here were against the LK symps, that yes IM is JK who proved to be as good an attorney as LK was a boarder.

The fact is that the only thing now ‘globally firm’ is how the overwhelming majority of public believe that LK not only orchestrated this twisted nightmare but that she is also responsible for its repercussions and her injury. The irony is stunning in its magnitude.

Watching the few cling and contort, trying to be clever and twist things to their now long dead narrative used to frustrate me but I can say that I now find their verbal gymnastics hysterically funny. In fact I’m almost impressed by their tenacity.

Almost.

Carry on.

19 Likes

We removed some inappropriate comments and responses to them and addressed them with the poster. We appreciate that a lot of people have become invested in this situation, and we’ll continue to provide an avenue for discussion, but please do so with respect toward our posting policies.

29 Likes

The screen shot posted earlier shows her comment that the complaint was for verbal, not physical abuse. The DCPP employee testified that it was not sexual abuse and the prosecutor repeated that in court.

And you are mistaken. The proof is for verbal non-sexual abuse. The SS snippet posted with the box checked up thread includes a comment that the complaint was verbal not physical. The DCPP employee testified it was not sexual. The prosecutor brought that up again when crossing Dr Simring as Dr Simring had it wrong on his report.