There was enough evidence that he shot her that the jury declined to find him NG. Given that the jury also agreed he was insane, he was not criminally responsible for that “conduct”.
Whether he is civilly liable for that conduct remains to be seen.
I comprehend just fine.
So, yesterday was a case management session. I assume that the highlight topics were the current discovery related motions. I also assume that whatever was said about that went straight back to the judge and will influence his decisions. Maybe he was waiting to see if he would need to rule or if the parties would decide to follow the rules on their own.
11 Likes
The form did not specify “physical abuse”.
It asked whether there were allegations or concerns of child abuse or child sexual abuse.
Allegations or concerns of verbal abuse of children would be covered by that broad question.
1 Like
Ok but I’m not Eggbutt. So how about you attempt to debate ME on what I believe!
I think many of LKs statement are total lies and have no truth to them but rather she says whatever lie she must to win.
Address THAT and not by trying to use what another poster thinks.
20 Likes
There is no evidence that she reported an allegation of “sexual abuse” to SS.
This was one of your main claims before the trial — oh, wait, your claim was that she reported sexual abuse by MB directly to CPS. The testimony in the trial revealed that CPS was referred by SS, and they were investigating child neglect by MHG.
How wrong can you be? Tell us again how you’ve been 100% correct about everything.
I guess you’re saying it’s @trubandloki who is lying about LK reporting child sexual abuse, and not you.
1 Like
Circular arguments, arguments that deflect, ridiculous premise are all what one does when they are trying to deflect or play games.
LKs buddies are growing more desperate by the minute it seems.
15 Likes
Questions:
-
I have been assuming that LK filled out the SS report and submitted it. Do we know that is the case? Or was it filled out by an SS representative during a phone conversation with LK?
-
Do we know that her “comment” that the abuse was not physical was in response to a question on the form? Or in a general comment section of the form?
-
Were those her actual words, or an interpretative comment or summation added by the SS representative (assuming that is who actually filled out the form)?
And honest to God, if she was as deliberately obfuscative and evasive during that conversation as she was when on the witness stand, I can’t imagine how the SS investigator made heads or tails of what she was saying.
20 Likes
LOL. No. I don’t realize that lying on SM is only lying on SM if one admits to lying on SM in open court. ???
It’s seems unlikely that @trubandloki will have occasion to address the issue of the veracity of her SM posts in court in the foreseeable future, so she will not need to face face that question under oath.
Until she faces a court date as a witness, you apparently believe that she is free to lie on SM as much as she wishes.
1 Like
Strange that you’re trying to hide behind @trubandloki. Is your argument that weak?
Ooops! It IS that weak!!
19 Likes
I mostly agree. I think the mediator attempted to see if there were a compromise position on what material needed to be turned over that both sides could agree on without the judge having to rule. If they couldn’t reach an agreement, the mediation is over, and it’s up to the judge to decide.
2 Likes
Case management isn’t mediation. That isn’t the point of case management hearings.
15 Likes
@eggbutt is the one hiding behind @trubandloki by attributing to her the lie that LK reported MB to SS for sexual abuse.
1 Like
I know really…geez. I am clearly doing something right CH is doing that good 'ol make-up a story and state it as a fact thing about me.
And all I want is understand why Jonathan Kanarek ( @Inigo-montoya ) and Kirby Kanarek ( @Seeker1 ) are refusing to respond to their individual subpoenas in the case filed by their daughter Lauren Kanarek. It is so strange for a lawyer to ignore a subpoena, let alone one in a case that their family filed.
35 Likes
Wasn’t there a mediator assigned to the case management conference?
Isn’t it possible the mediator could propose “LK travels to NJ for deposition, but in Nagel’s offices, not Silvers”? If the two sides agree, the judge would not have to rule.
Same with subpoena on JK. Can both sides agree to JK handing over this subset of what was requested, but not everything in the original subpoena?
I agree it’s not mediation as to the final settlement.
Wrong. It’s you.
11 Likes
KM, please put CH on ignore. Your (well-reasoned) replies just cause CH to continue posting ridiculous theories and “alternative facts.”
45 Likes
Your statement that the SS document was proof that LK was alleging child sexual abuse by MB is a falsehood. Your continuing to repeat it is lying on SM.
There is disagreement between the two sides as to what information KK and JK will be required to provide. Also disagreement as to whether LK can give her deposition remotely, and if not, whether the in person deposition will be held in the offices of her attorney or the defendant’s attorney.
The judge will at some point issue rulings on these issues. Big deal.
1 Like
This isn’t Burger King. You don’t get to have it your way.
Initiating and being in a lawsuit is a pain in the ass. I’m the plaintiff in one too right now. Except I couldn’t give a shlt in whose office the deposition is because in ANY office, the truth is the truth.
I don’t require neutral territory as I’m sure enough in myself that my delicate wittle feelings don’t require coddling or special attention. It’s business. Even though I’m suing the folks who took my dad from me, it’s business.
26 Likes
And there you have it, folks. The Oracle, the great sage in a bathrobe, has spoken.
1 Like
