MB Civil Trial: JK/KK Contempt of Court?

[trubandloki]

@ekat

@trubandloki

Legal people - I have been assuming all along that basic beginner level law school is where people are taught the importance of responding to a subpoena. Is that a correct assumption?

I am really confused why a lawyer of any type, in this case Jonathan Kanarek/@Inigo-montoya, would find them in a position where they just ignored a subpoena. Let alone a subpoena in the case someone in their own family filed.

How can anyone who is a lawyer of any type think this is the right way to treat the court system?

Heck everyone from (gasp) clerks, to legal secretaries, to paralegals and attorneys are taught the importance of subpoenas and quite frankly, court deadlines, from the beginning.

It’s one of the things that has mystified me since the days the motions for contempt were filed - how an attorney (retired or not) could ignore a subpoena, and let his wife also ignore a subpoena?

I do not understand why Jonathan Kanarek would think it’s ok. I cut Kirby Kanarek a tiny, tiny bit of slack here because she may have just relied on her husband’s guidance. But it just makes absolutely zero sense. None.

What would the positive of ignoring it be?
I can not think of one.

It just seems like an insult to the court, wasting the courts time.

I can see someone who has no legal experience not realizing the importance of a timely response of some sort. But darn.

[Squirt]

Ok, I’m not sure why it quoted this post…it was supposed to quote one of the ones talking about how there is no limit to the lengths that LK goes to.

/fail/

[ekat]

@trubandloki

What would the positive of ignoring it be?
I can not think of one.

It just seems like an insult to the court, wasting the courts time.

I can see someone who has no legal experience not realizing the importance of a timely response of some sort. But darn.

I mean, sometimes you see defendants do this kind of stuff to try to buy time, or delay the inevitable. But you almost never see it from the Plaintiff’s side. They brought the case. They usually want to get their story out there and get that case moving along.

[trubandloki]

So strange that this is yet another post by Jonathan Kanarek that differs from the screen shot of the actual SS filing by Lauren Kanarek shown during the 48 hours episode. Strange, so very strange.

[IdahoRider]

@eggbutt

Strange family relations, huh? Are they all related?

Well, they all act the same way if the responses on Facebook are any indication.

Sheilah

[eggbutt]

@ekat

how an attorney (retired or not) could ignore a subpoena, and let his wife also ignore a subpoena?

And then to LIE about it by in so many words saying the dog ate the homework!

[trubandloki]

@ekat

I mean, sometimes you see defendants do this kind of stuff to try to buy time, or delay he inevitable. But you almost never see it from the Plaintiff’s side. They brought the case. They usually want to get their story out there and get that case moving along.

They have been screaming from the roof tops (well, ok, posting all over the internet) from day one that they want to get their story out there and the case moving forward so it makes it even more confusing that now that their chance to prove all of their points is here they are refusing to give the information asked for.

[ekat]

So…IM/Jonathan Kanarek doubled down on that SS report and transcript, claiming LK didn’t say what she said. Wow.

[Sdel]

@trubandloki

So strange that this is yet another post by Jonathan Kanarek that differs from the screen shot of the actual SS filing by Lauren Kanarek shown during the 48 hours episode. Strange, so very strange.

Well, when I asked about the discrepancies between him and LK about RC and the murder plot, he said they were talking about different audios. Maybe it’s like that….

[ekat]

@eggbutt

And then to LIE about it by in so many words saying the dog ate the homework!

Well, you know, IM/Jonathan Kanarek doesn’t lie, so maybe the responses (and their attorneys handling them) really did get lost.

[eggbutt]

@trubandloki

So strange that this is yet another post by Jonathan Kanarek that differs from the screen shot of the actual SS filing by Lauren Kanarek shown during the 48 hours episode. Strange, so very strange.

[Edit] There are so many out and out lies in this one post, it is actually difficult to find one honest word.

[ekat]

@trubandloki

They have been screaming from the roof tops (well, ok, posting all over the internet) from day one that they want to get their story out there and the case moving forward so it makes it even more confusing that now that their chance to prove all of their points is here they are refusing to give the information asked for.

It’s all recorded! Wait till you hear the audios! 48 Hours is going to love the recordings!

LK to 48 Hours: chooses not to discuss MB or the shooting.

LK and her witnesses to discovery in the suit they filed: no thank you.

Things that make you go hhhhhmmmmm…

[smoofox]

@ekat

@trubandloki

They have been screaming from the roof tops (well, ok, posting all over the internet) from day one that they want to get their story out there and the case moving forward so it makes it even more confusing that now that their chance to prove all of their points is here they are refusing to give the information asked for.

It’s all recorded! Wait till you hear the audios! 48 Hours is going to love the recordings!

LK to 48 Hours: chooses not to discuss MB or the shooting.

LK and her witnesses to discovery in the suit they filed: no thank you.

Things that make you go hhhhhmmmmm…

Hhhhmmmmm indeed.

You left out the BOMBSHELLS!!! part.

[KurPlexed]

“Her calls to SS were reactive and defensive in nature”

Interesting

[ekat]

@smoofox

You left out the BOMBSHELLS!!! part.

Solid Gold!! Career ruining bombshells!

Still waiting…

[Angela_Freda]

@eggbutt

Lauren needs to be banned from USEF for her weaponization of the Federation.

Which she admitted under oath in a court of law.

[trubandloki]

@ekat

Well, you know, IM/Jonathan Kanarek doesn’t lie, so maybe the responses (and their attorneys handling them) really did get lost.

Oh my, should someone file a missing person report. Those attorneys have been missing for some time now.

[ekat]

@trubandloki

Oh my, should someone file a missing person report. Those attorneys have been missing for some time now.

I Know! They haven’t even filed Entries of Appearance yet! That would be concerning, if Jonathan and Kirby truly had hired attorneys and turned the subpoenas over to them, per IM/JK’s post.

[erinmeri]

@ekat

It’s all recorded! Wait till you hear the audios!

Can I just say, as an aside, that I hate the term “audios”? And I worked in film for most of my adult life. Nobody calls them that in my experience. Drives me nuts.

ETA: people WILL say “audio”, sans s.

[trubandloki]

@ekat

@trubandloki

Oh my, should someone file a missing person report. Those attorneys have been missing for some time now.

I Know! They haven’t even filed Entries of Appearance yet! That would be concerning, if Jonathan and Kirby truly had hired attorneys and turned the subpoenas over to them, per IM/JK’s post.

Well, I am sure the Entries of Appearance is with the missing attorneys and the lost filing.

All together.

Maybe in some imaginary box? Or a mind movie?