MB Civil Trial: JK/KK Contempt of Court?

[FitzE]

Yes, how indeed is one to get info without such slanderous/libelous accusations?

I cannot believe any lawyer admitted to any bar could possible characterise the below as harassment:

LK says in interrogatories, ‘ask JK’; defense asks JK through proper channels/filings.

Calling that simple action/reaction harassment is…bizarre in the extreme. Like, they literally do what LK tells them to do and suddenly they are harassing her family.

That doesn’t even take legal knowledge to understand, just regular common sense ability to follow a two-step normal interaction between two parties.

Stinks to high heaven of desperation and attempted manipulation to characterise it thusly.

[trubandloki]

I can not imagine wanting to work with a lawyer who does stuff like this.

But… I am not a Kanarek so…

[ekat]

@Knights_Mom

I was counting on TWO parties, one for each holiday!!

Brilliant!

[trubandloki]

< Taps fingers together thinking of a good Ninja costume >

Do we have to be barefoot? My grumpy old feet do not like barefoot anymore. Can I file a request for an exemption to the barefoot requirement?

[FitzE]

Hang on, didn’t someone up thread say she also told the other side to get stuff off SM themselves rather than her producing it as requested (and as would be normal and cooperative)?

If so, how does getting stuff from her SM themselves now constitute stalking?

It’s like an abusive relationship: tell the other side exactly what to do (while not be cooperative at all) and then, when they do what you told them to do, call them stalkers and harassers.

Just despicable behaviour, honestly. I’m disgusted. It’s bad enough coming from the Ks and some posters here, but how their lawyer could take part in such dirty tricks is beyond my ken. He is exactly the type of gaming, not-very-bright, dishonest trickster type that gives the whole profession a bad name.

ETA: underlined text

[trubandloki]

Thank you @FitzE, you said it far better than I did. That was what I was trying to say.

[DownYonder]

@ekat

The Krol decision took commitment out of the jury’s hands and set up a process to ensure the patient’s rights weren’t trampled on.

And, here we are, seemingly ignoring that very decision and trampling on Barisone’s rights. It’s not right. Maybe Michael Barisone will be the next patient to revamp the process because he shouldn’t have been left to languish like this.

I get that Ann Klein didn’t have room in the beginning. But it flies in the face of NJ law to let this go on this long.

And I suggested on previous threads that if I was his attorneys, I would be contacting the state Attorney General, the state representatives for that jurisdiction, and quite possibly investigative reporters for various local television stations. I would get the story out there how the state is in egregious violation of MB’s civil rights. And I would keep shaking trees until someone makes something happen.

[erinmeri]

@FitzE

Hang on, didn’t someone up thread say she also told the other side to get stuff off SM themselves rather than her producing it as requested (and as would be normal and cooperative)?

If so, how does getting stuff from her SM themselves now constitute stalking?

It’s like an abusive relationship: tell the other side exactly what to do (while not be cooperative at all) and then, when they do what you told them to do, call them stalkers and harassers.

Just despicable behaviour, honestly. I’m disgusted. It’s bad enough coming from the Ks and some posters here, but how their lawyer could take part in such dirty tricks is beyond my ken. He is exactly the type of gaming, not-very-bright, dishonest trickster type that gives the whole profession a bad name.

One might even call it… gaslighting.

[LiberalSnowflake]

@Fiesta01

@Sdel

Spain in May. I may or may not have threatened to bring a horse home with me….

Ooh, there’s an idea. If I could get a horse out of the deal, maybe it would help me get over my unease about going.

Good luck on your maybe shopping trip!

The Spanish Riding School (SRS) in Vienna sells off their young stock from their stud in Piber from time to time. Come grab yourself a green Lipizzaner as a souvenir.

SRS: Horses for sale

The stables tour is an incredible way to spend a few hours too, the tack room alone had me swooning.

[DownYonder]

@FitzE

Just despicable behaviour, honestly. I’m disgusted. It’s bad enough coming from the Ks and some posters here, but how their lawyer could take part in such dirty tricks is beyond my ken. He is exactly the type of gaming, not-very-bright, dishonest trickster type that gives the whole profession a bad name.

IOW, the perfect attorney for his client and her family.

[FitzE]

@erinmeri

One might even call it… gaslighting.

Exactly. That term is so often misused (including in this thread) and yet, here is a perfect example: tell a person something, they respond accordingly to your specific direction and, the moment you do exactly as they told you to, they re-frame it as something nefarious, bad, and wrong.

And it’s utterly artless - like they are so stupid they think the rest of us are so stupid that we cannot see what is plain to see?

Un - - believable this whole sordid crew.

[ekat]

@FitzE

Hang on, didn’t someone up thread say she also told the other side to get stuff off SM themselves rather than her producing it as requested (and as would be normal and cooperative)?

Look - she answered an interrogatory question with - it’s all publicly online. An invitation to look her up online, if you will.

[trubandloki]

That response is not fully honest anyway since she has made so much of her social media private now that she finally realizes that things she says can be used against her.

[ekat]

@trubandloki

That response is not fully honest anyway since she has made so much of her social media private now that she finally realizes that things she says can be used against her.

Very true. But still, don’t answer discovery in the lawsuit you filed with - it’s publicly online, and then claim it’s harassment when people find the stuff you pointed them to.

It boggles my mind - a plaintiff acting this way in her own suit, and thinking that’s a good look for the Court.

[trubandloki]

Will the defense lawyers be able to tell the jury about these types of things?

[ekat]

@trubandloki

Will the defense lawyers be able to tell the jury about these types of things?

Interrogatories are sworn under penalty of perjury. So yes, it’s one more piece they can use to impeach a witness or the plaintiff.

[trubandloki]

@ekat

@trubandloki

Will the defense lawyers be able to tell the jury about these types of things?

Interrogatories are sworn under penalty of perjury. So yes, it’s one more piece they can use to impeach a witness or the plaintiff.

I was more talking about how the person who filed this claim is not being cooperative and just plain being difficult, then and their lawyer.
The whole - Look at my social media (that I have locked down and purged) but if you look at my social media and use anything I posted there I am going to scream from the roof tops that you are stalking me.

[yaya]

@ekat

@FitzE

Hang on, didn’t someone up thread say she also told the other side to get stuff off SM themselves rather than her producing it as requested (and as would be normal and cooperative)?

Look - she answered an interrogatory question with - it’s all publicly online. An invitation to look her up online, if you will.

So putting all the social media stuff aside, she doesn’t have a single date book or phone calendar entry for doctor’s appointments regarding her injuries? Who doesn’t keep records for something like that? Especially when you are the one filing a personal injury suit? She really has none of it? Good luck proving your case!

[ekat]

@trubandloki

was more talking about how the person who filed this claim is not being cooperative and just plain being difficult, then and their lawyer.
The whole - Look at my social media (that I have locked down and purged) but if you look at my social media and use anything I posted there I am going to scream from the roof tops that you are stalking me.

There are ways to get that point across.

Q1: Did you file this suit?
Q2: Were you served interrogatories as part of the suit?
Q3: Do you remember this answer you gave? (Shows q&a) where you advised your social media posts are available publicly online?
Q4: Do you remember this answer you gave re: not generally deleting or editing your posts unless theirs a typographical error (shows q&a)

Proceed to introduce allllllllllllllllllllllll the posts that show otherwise.

(Really basic description)

[hut-ho78]

@ekat

@FitzE

Hang on, didn’t someone up thread say she also told the other side to get stuff off SM themselves rather than her producing it as requested (and as would be normal and cooperative)?

Look - she answered an interrogatory question with - it’s all publicly online. An invitation to look her up online, if you will.

Where was her response to an interrogatory posted online? Was that in court filings?