That is why I said “court order.” They still have to have a “court order” for the police to act. Obtaining a “court order” after 3 day eviction notice could be soon or not so soon depending on the schedule of the judge and the persistence of the lawyer.
I’m trying to remember if it was you or someone else who explained that to me, maybe Knight’s_Mom.
And, as she’s always done, she used daddy as her enforcer!
Just to be clear - the judgment itself doesn’t get them out. The tenant still can ask for more time - up to 6 ( six ) months. So, maybe, 6 months after the judgment, said landlord can get them off their property, which is more like 7 months after the filing of that 3 day notice when you add on getting onto the calendar.
And said she left them in North Carolina.
She should have left. He should have evicted her instead of shooting her.
The actual notice to vacate spurred her to consult with her lawyer. We’ll never know how long she would have remained there if she had not been shot.
Not exactly. It spurred her Dad to hire an attorney for her and back out of his negotiations with Mr Tarshis.
And the answer giver, which is why it is NOT harassment that Jonathan Kanarek was issued a subpoena in the civil case filed by his daughter.
A subpoena that he chose to ignore, which lead to the contempt filings for him and his wife Kirby Kanarek.
[edit]
Wrong. Lest I say the word Ruger. With all the proof I’ve shown of all the people who saw that same post before she deleted or hid it.
Which I will not show again as now we are discussing how the civil jury will find LKs actions and words horrendous too.
She posted there her guns, whatever the make, were left in NC. How is HHs statement that LK said she “left them in NC” “wrong”?
You keep saying this as if it has anything to do with what I have said in my post.
He was clearly in the process of doing exactly that. We have no information whatsoever about why he was present at his own home on the day of the incident.
By the way in NJ owner occupied residences with 2 or fewer rental units are not subject to the full tenancy laws and he was able to move for a judgement of possession on the 8th. I have no doubt that the notices given would have informed the tenants of this and I suspect that the date is a lot more significant to the plaintiff here than it is to the defendant. The process is called “summary dispossess” and it allows a landlord in that situation to, as it is aptly named, possess a property via summary action and does not entitle the tenant to the same protections as the Anti Eviction Act would.
And also, when you want to reply to one particular line someone posted, you can highlight it, click on the quote pop-up, and reply away. the rest of the comment and everything else attached to it by clicking on the upside down ^ in the top right hand corner of the quoted text box. I’ve even figured that out. 
She made a post saying she had placed a deposit on a new one. This was distinctly called out at trial and she ostensibly claimed it was a lie.
I wonder if a dismissal is the ultimate goal. Why else would anyone balk and obfuscate in a lawsuit that they initiated?
A risky gamble. If the court determines you were wasting everyone’s time deliberately or you have no real case and intend to delay to try to get a settlement - you can be dismissed with prejudice meaning effectively you can not bring suit on that matter before the court again.
This seems like the question that we have been wondering all along.
Perhaps that is the motivation? When the suit was filed, the plaintiff and her parents clearly did not expect the NGRI and NG verdicts.
Honestly. Who knows how long. She stayed another 6 months even having been shot.
I’m being a little sarcastic. I don’t think her being shot plays should be related to what she did or didn’t do.
It’s just KM being confused again. Kind of like denying I was posting New Jersey tenant law and instructions until she did, years later.
Which he was managing until a group of people determined to ruin him, set about doing just that.
You have got to be kidding me, right? This just bolsters my point of years about evicting her.
Thank you for showing me my position was even stronger than I realized. 
By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. You may also receive promotional emails from The Chronicle of the Horse. You can opt out at any time.
For Customers
Company
Terms of Use
