Just saying, to be clear, there were two inoperable semi-automatic hand guns and two absolutely operational revolvers found in the safe. Plus the shotguns or whatever they were.
Should we assume LK, a.k.a The Barefoot Ninja, snuck in there and pulled the pins for the safety of the rest of the world since she admitted on the stand she had violated the privacy Michael’s office?
Or maybe it was that superhero RG? But he wouldn’t be afraid of guns as he dodges bullets like a pro! The Marvel Universe super heros ain’t got nothing on RG!
And…why pull the pins of some, but leave operational guns sitting right next to them? I mean, if there’s some implication regarding pulling the pins for someone’s safety or whatever we are trying to imply.
Each party generally would have liability insurance in order to protect themselves. SGF probably did have liability insurance along with fire insurance on the farm. MB should have had liability insurance written on himself personally or on this business, MBD, LLC.
SGF is asserting in their cross claim that they are not liable for MBs actions.
What kind of insurance was testified to in the trial? Medical? Mortality insurance on the horses? Insurance on the vehicles? Workers compensation?Liability insurance?
I’m not saying, directly or obliquely, that anyone committed perjury. He could well have paid for some types of insurance, but not others.
I’m guessing he did not have medical insurance and that his business, MBD, LLC, did not have liability insurance. But I have no way of knowing.
I wonder why he did not pay a $25,000 hospital bill if he has “millions” as Bilinkas claimed in court. He’ll also be expecting the unpaid doctors to testify as to his injuries in the trial.
If the man were a successful businessman, which was testified to in court, why would you assume he had no insurance???
Is this another one of those movies in your head?
I would suggest this is something more nefarious on your part- just another poorly concealed attempt to guide the narrative in a negative direction for Michael.
Nice try, but the entire board sees what you attempt to do!
You are 100% correct about one thing- you have no way of knowing!
I’m guessing he did have medical insurance and one of several things happened:
He was not coherent. And he’s been locked up since. Perhaps he didn’t give correct info, and by the time someone got it to the hospital, insurance denied it as being too late.
He hadn’t met his deductible.
Paperwork was filled out as this being a personal injury matter that someone else might be responsible for, and bills were on hold. Now that the lawsuit isn’t stayed, hospital filed this as a future lien against any settlements. (This scenario has happened to more than one person I know, including myself, except I wasn’t the party arrested).
Med insurance originally paid it and determined they paid it in error and clawed back from the hospital.
Doesn’t matter, you are attempting to put forth multiple claims of “bad business practices” in an attempt to pin liability and negligence on MB’s part. Something that has already been disproven under oath. Carrying insurance is a good business practice, and the odds are likely that if he carried one type, he carried health insurance and all the relevant types he needed to. Tarshis seems to have made sure of that.
I think LK is primarily going after the insurance company for SGF. She will need to establish that they were negligent in releasing the property to someone with known mental problems. If the firing pins were removed to prevent the guns being used by MB, that goes pretty far toward showing that his mental problems and his potential for violence were known.
If LKs lawyers argue that in court, do you have an alternative explanation for why the firing pins were removed?
It’s not a “grand leap” at all. It’s the obvious question to be asking.
Happens all the time with deceased or incarcerated people. Happened with my dad too. After the estate was settled I was notified of a claim filed in court for a medical bill I knew nothing about. I also called the exterminators to do a yearly treatment and was told payment was due from the previous year and my dad was normally one to pay right away until he was hospitalized.
Don’t you think that would have been raised in the criminal trial?
I don’t understand why you can presume all kinds of things, but nobody else can s peculate, according to you.
News flash…people are allowed to have mental health problems. It’s not illegal or negligent to lease property to people with mental health problems. In fact, it is highly illegal to discriminate against people with mental health issues. Or are you suggesting that everyone with mental health issues should be homeless because it’s dangerous to lease property to them?
I would not surprised at a hospital/doctor bill for $25,000 for the orthopedic treatment of the arm plus any diagnostic procedures to check for concussion or other injuries.
The highlighted section was you just making stuff up to prove a faulty point. There is zero indication that was done or why it would have been done. Your statement is a lie.
Let me ask you ONE MORE TIME, known by whom? Until you can answer that question with authority, I’d suggest you refrain from making the statement again to keep from making yourself look foolish.