MB update

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@iberianfan

Don’t you think that would have been raised in the criminal trial?
I don’t understand why you can presume all kinds of things, but nobody else can s peculate, according to you.

SGF was not on trial in the criminal trial.

I asked a question: why would the firing pins have been removed? Please speculate as to all possible reasons that might have happened.

[jvanrens]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@eggbutt

@CurrentlyHorseless

with known mental problems and for permitting guns on the property.

Hmmmm, exactly who should have known about Barisone’s well handled problems he had worked on for YEARS with apparent success? And please explain what working “farm” type facility isn’t permitted to have guns on the property. Will you be objecting to shovels in the back of a farm truck next?

Here’s a question for you, Eggbutt. It came up in the trial that MB had several hand guns or revolvers (in addition to long guns) in his gun safe, but the hand gun/revolver type guns were not operational due to having their firing pins removed.

Why would the firing pins have been removed? Did someone realize that, given MBs known problems, he should not have access to functional hand guns?

There was only one with the firing pin removed. One didn’t have any bullets for it. The other was an old style revolver. Watch the prosecution’s closing argument’s again if you want to nitpick this point. I doubt the lack of firing pin on one gun was done given MBs “known problems” . If I was worried about someone’s “known problems” I would have found a way to make all of them inoperable or disappear.

[cutter99]

@eggbutt

@CurrentlyHorseless

someone with known mental problems.

Let me ask you ONE MORE TIME, known by whom? Until you can answer that question with authority, I’d suggest you refrain from making the statement again to keep from making yourself look foolish.

If @CurrentlyHorseless is making Michael the poster child for mental illness, I suppose we are all mentally ill according to their standards.

What does that make The Barefoot Ninja and Super Laundry Man?

[ekat]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I asked a question: why would the firing pins have been removed? Please speculate as to all possible reasons that might have happened.

I keep asking about the other perfectly operational guns. Alas, it appears we both won’t get answers.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@iberianfan

Don’t you think that would have been raised in the criminal trial?
I don’t understand why you can presume all kinds of things, but nobody else can s peculate, according to you.

SGF was not on trial in the criminal trial.

I asked a question: why would the firing pins have been removed? Please speculate as to all possible reasons that might have happened.

One they weren’t all removed. Two there could be a number of reasons. Your previous statement is libelous. You asserted something provably false. You inserted nefarious intent.

Bad monkey.

[eggbutt]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Was his arm broken or dislocated?

His arm had a severe twisting fracturer requiring surgery. He apparently still has issues with it. Perhaps RG will let us know how he broke that arm, presumably after rendering him unconscious.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

@CurrentlyHorseless

someone with known mental problems.

Let me ask you ONE MORE TIME, known by whom? Until you can answer that question with authority, I’d suggest you refrain from making the statement again to keep from making yourself look foolish.

LK will try to establish that SGF knew or should have known of his mental problems and potential for violence. I’m not on her legal team, or her, or her family, so it’s not my job to establish it.

I’m just giving my humble opinion on the civil trial.

[Sdel]

@CurrentlyHorseless

LK will try to establish that SGF knew or should have known of his mental problems and potential for violence. I’m not on her legal team, or her, or her family, so it’s not my job to establish it.

Hmmm….anyone else remember who crowed about MB’s medications? And then deleted it.

ETA: you can stop saying the bolded. None of us believe you anyway.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@eggbutt

@CurrentlyHorseless

someone with known mental problems.

Let me ask you ONE MORE TIME, known by whom? Until you can answer that question with authority, I’d suggest you refrain from making the statement again to keep from making yourself look foolish.

LK will try to establish that SGF knew or should have known of his mental problems and potential for violence. I’m not on her legal team, or her, or her family, so it’s not my job to establish it.

I’m just giving my humble opinion on the civil trial.

Your humble opinion isn’t a very good one. It’s an opinion based on desire and not fact.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@iberianfan

Don’t you think that would have been raised in the criminal trial?
I don’t understand why you can presume all kinds of things, but nobody else can s peculate, according to you.

SGF was not on trial in the criminal trial.

I asked a question: why would the firing pins have been removed? Please speculate as to all possible reasons that might have happened.

One they weren’t all removed. Two there could be a number of reasons. Your previous statement is libelous. You asserted something probably false. You inserted nefarious intent.

Bad monkey.

Negligence is not nefarious intent.

I made no libelous statements.

I asked a question: why would the firing pins have been removed from the hand gun/revolvers to render them inoperable?

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@iberianfan

Don’t you think that would have been raised in the criminal trial?
I don’t understand why you can presume all kinds of things, but nobody else can s peculate, according to you.

SGF was not on trial in the criminal trial.

I asked a question: why would the firing pins have been removed? Please speculate as to all possible reasons that might have happened.

One they weren’t all removed. Two there could be a number of reasons. Your previous statement is libelous. You asserted something probably false. You inserted nefarious intent.

Bad monkey.

Negligence is not nefarious intent.

I made no libelous statements.

I asked a question: why would the firing pins have been removed from the hand gun/revolvers to render them inoperable?

Yeah you did. And not the first.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@cutter99

@eggbutt

@CurrentlyHorseless

someone with known mental problems.

Let me ask you ONE MORE TIME, known by whom? Until you can answer that question with authority, I’d suggest you refrain from making the statement again to keep from making yourself look foolish.

If @CurrentlyHorseless is making Michael the poster child for mental illness, I suppose we are all mentally ill according to their standards.

What does that make The Barefoot Ninja and Super Laundry Man?

The essence of the civil suit is whether SGF is liable because they knew or should have known that MB was suffering from or susceptible to, a mental break that would cause severe injury or death to others.

[ekat]

@CurrentlyHorseless

LK will try to establish that SGF knew or should have known of his mental problems and potential for violence. I’m not on her legal team, or her, or her family, so it’s not my job to establish it

Well, she hasn’t alleged that (yet) in her suit so…

[iberianfan]

You said it went a long way to show Michael’s propensity for violence. There is absolutely no evidence of that, that I am aware of, and, unlike you, I refuse to make assumptions.

You used an outstanding hospital bill to assume lack of insurance.

You have assumed sloppy business practices and that makes everything Michael’s fault.

Ms.Kanarek has come on here and other forums and shown herself to be a disagreeable individual, to put it mildly.

I just don’t understand your position regarding every fact means something negative about Michael.

[ekat]

@CurrentlyHorseless

The essence of the civil suit is whether SGF is liable because they knew or should have known that MB was suffering from or susceptible to, a mental break that would cause severe injury or death to others.

Not true. The essence of her suit against SGF is this:

“Defendant Sweetgrass Farms, LLC and/or ABC Corps (1- 10) and/or John Does (1-10) and/or Barisone is the owner, managing agent, controlling agent, managing representative, and/or operators of the farm, residence, and/or facility where the subject shooting occurred.
14. Defendants Sweetgrass Farms, LLC and/or ABC Corps (1- 10) and/or John Does (1-10) and/or Barisone allowed, permitted, suffered, or otherwise condoned firearms to be present on their property.
15. Allowing firearms to be present on their property is an ultra-hazardous activity, which has the potential to seriously injure and/or kill innocent people.
16. As such, Defendants Sweetgrass Farms, LLC and/or ABC Corps (1-10) and/or John Does (1-10) and/or Barisone are strictly liable for all injuries caused by this.”

[eggbutt]

@CurrentlyHorseless

LK will try to establish that SGF knew or should have known of his mental problems and potential for violence.

And you know this how? Let’s not discuss apparent mental health public displays without bringing up LK’s long history of poor behavior, mkay?

Obviously your tangent of the day is firing pens and a leap toward mental health. Again, for a highly successful, functioning individual it appears any mental health issues were well under control until the Finish the Bastard plan was implemented.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@iberianfan

Don’t you think that would have been raised in the criminal trial?
I don’t understand why you can presume all kinds of things, but nobody else can s peculate, according to you.

SGF was not on trial in the criminal trial.

I asked a question: why would the firing pins have been removed? Please speculate as to all possible reasons that might have happened.

One they weren’t all removed. Two there could be a number of reasons. Your previous statement is libelous. You asserted something probably false. You inserted nefarious intent.

Bad monkey.

Negligence is not nefarious intent.

I made no libelous statements.

I asked a question: why would the firing pins have been removed from the hand gun/revolvers to render them inoperable?

Yeah you did. And not the first.

Please quote the exact statement of mine you consider libelous, @Knights_Mom, or drop the accusation.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@cutter99

@eggbutt

@CurrentlyHorseless

someone with known mental problems.

Let me ask you ONE MORE TIME, known by whom? Until you can answer that question with authority, I’d suggest you refrain from making the statement again to keep from making yourself look foolish.

If @CurrentlyHorseless is making Michael the poster child for mental illness, I suppose we are all mentally ill according to their standards.

What does that make The Barefoot Ninja and Super Laundry Man?

The essence of the civil suit is whether SGF is liable because they knew or should have known that MB was suffering from or susceptible to, a mental break that would cause severe injury or death to others.

And you’re posting nonsense about a piece missing on one of multiple guns like you’re Sherlock Holmes. You are trying to insert nefarious intent on something which doesn’t exist. You are naming an act which never occurred as not only having occurred, but occurred due to some plan or conspiracy. And that is hugely libelous.

[Sdel]

@CurrentlyHorseless

The essence of the civil suit is whether SGF is liable because they knew or should have known that MB was suffering from or susceptible to, a mental break that would cause severe injury or death to others.

Easy to dismantle, how many years did MB operate that farm without incident? Where did he start from and what did he build it up to?

It’s pretty easy to zero in on the timeline that caused the break….I think that would be when a certain guest refused to leave and she and her family plotted to “Finish the Bastard”.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@iberianfan

Don’t you think that would have been raised in the criminal trial?
I don’t understand why you can presume all kinds of things, but nobody else can s peculate, according to you.

SGF was not on trial in the criminal trial.

I asked a question: why would the firing pins have been removed? Please speculate as to all possible reasons that might have happened.

One they weren’t all removed. Two there could be a number of reasons. Your previous statement is libelous. You asserted something probably false. You inserted nefarious intent.

Bad monkey.

Negligence is not nefarious intent.

I made no libelous statements.

I asked a question: why would the firing pins have been removed from the hand gun/revolvers to render them inoperable?

Yeah you did. And not the first.

Please quote the exact statement of mine you consider libelous, @Knights_Mom, or drop the accusation.

I already did above. It’s highlighted, Sherlock.

Here let me make it easy.