It is very interesting to see that RG describes the altercation as an attack, and not defense, on SM.
Freudian slip.
Do you mean recently? Whereabouts?
Iâll PM it.
Thanks!
Heck, they could find MB liable and still determine SGF and RC are not.
Based on filings, I would guess SGF has spent more than RC and I would guess at this point itâs not an insignificant amount. Remember, they were the ones to ask the stay in the civil suit be lifted as soon as they could after the verdict.
Apropos of nothing, but gifts are not taxable income to the recipient. So, no matter who pays attorney fees, unless a service was promised in exchange, itâs a gift. Most likely, if someone else paid fees on MBâs behalf, itâs a gift.
Or a loan, the proceeds of which are also not taxable income unless and until it is forgiven.
So youâre saying LK had no idea what she was talking about on a legal matter? Or she was lying on social media?
No. Way.
That is interesting!
Iâm, frankly, glad I havenât figured out where to read comments on Youtube.
.
Oh⊠itâs remarkable! Thereâs no moderation. And just random people. Itâs really funny to see how some people respond to her diatribes.
She is remarkably consistent in her style though.
Wasnât that exactly the successful defense used by the kid who brought an AR-15 to a protest?
Somewhere upthread, I think it was stated that part of what MB is seeking is a complete stop by LK of mentioning him on social media.
If MB wins, and LK violates that and continues the online harassment, what would be the legal consequences to LK?
Could be Contempt. Includes possible fines or imprisonment depending on jurisdiction and degree of the order violation.
Contempt of court, in which the judge could levy fines, sanctions, and determine if it meets a criminal act.
Haha!!
Jinx!
You keep saying this but that still doesnât make it true. Carrying a firearm proactively in case itâs needed for self defence is apparently one of Americaâs most cherished rights.
And I have wondered if this is why she kept thinking she had been medevaced in helicopterâŠ
One thing I find really interesting is that several on the forum have proposed the question - why hasnât there been the same outcry for RG as there has been for LK IRT alleged harassment and bullying of RG onlineâŠ
The response wasnât, oh, RG has been bullied and harassed the same (or a version of this).
But instead, that for about a 10 minute window of time, RG was a hero.
I believe that the posters who harp LK had been harassed (etc) have more interest in defending LK because it aligns more with the self interest of the poster.
But it seems that there is some type of animosity towards RG within k klan that only permits him to have been a good or defendable person for that small 10 minute window during the shooting when he allegedly outran a bulletâŠ
So strange that there would be such a double standard amongst 2 people that went through roughly the same experience. So strange that RG is only defendable or even commendable during that 10 minute window.
Seems rocky to me.