MB update

18 Likes

In fact the US Supreme Court has done all but mandate it LOL

21 Likes

When we settled my fatherā€™s estate, we were told that cash gifts under $15,000 do not need to be reported to IRS. But if itā€™s over $15,000, it has to be reported and is taxed.

In the cases currently being discussed, I imagine even the retaining fees/service charges of the various attorneys are WELL over $15,000.

1 Like

No, heā€™s just the purse (if thatā€™s happening) and if heā€™s not a client, he canā€™t direct the attorneys. He can stop paying, if thatā€™s what heā€™s doing and he isnā€™t happy with the direction, but only the client gets to decide about how to go on.

4 Likes

It went to $16,000 this year, and thereā€™s a lifetime exception rule as well that is too complicated for my brain but probably the bigger brains can explain.

6 Likes

And I am again all astonishment at the very idea. :astonished:

6 Likes

I heard that if the giver pays the attorney directly and it doesnā€™t touch the hands of the person who the legal fees are for its not considered a gift but I could be wrong.

I know a 3rd party paying medical expenses directly to provider or insurance is exempt from taxation.

5 Likes

If you are referring to Kyle Rittenhouse, he brought it for self-defense because he was going into a riot zone to help protect a family business from being burned down by the rioting mob. Said mob attacked some bystanders and business owners as it moved through the area, and Rittenhouse went out to escort some of them to safety and try to tend to injuries (he had a medical kit with him). And then he got caught trying to make his way back to safety and was attacked by several people - which is why he shot them.

So yes, it was a case of self-defense, and the jury agreed despite the Stateā€™s and mainstream mediaā€™s attempt to portray him as a murderer.

6 Likes

Gifts of under $16,000 per year do not need to be reported to the IRS. If a person, say a parent, gives more than $16,000 in a given year, it must be reported to the IRS, and the excess would count as part of the giverā€™s estate when the estate is eventually settled. Estate taxes kick in only after a big exempt amount, so the estate of the parent would only owe taxes on the gift (over $16,000) if the total estate exceeds the exemption amount. But even if estate taxes were owed, the taxes are levied on the estate, not the recipient.

Bazinga

1 Like

Who cares? Let MB handle how he deals with contributions and donations. Itā€™s no oneā€™s business other than his and the contributor.

13 Likes

Speaking of contributions, if anyone is in contact with Lara, maybe mention MB auctioning some of his drawings. It seems like people would be happy to have them.

12 Likes

So, same thing.

14 Likes

And I for one would be very surprised if she abided by such an order. I think (as she has proven time and again) she would find other ways to discuss him, without calling him out by name. The King on a chessboard is one specific example she has used in the past.

10 Likes

Thatā€™s fine as long as he isnā€™t identified. Now if she posts under her name and talks about the trainer who shot her without specifically naming him that too may be prohibited as he is still identifiable.

7 Likes

So, as has been mentioned, the current annual exclusion amount, per donee, is $16,000. Gifts over that amount have to be reported on form 709, gift tax return. That said, there is no tax due until the donor exceeds the current estate tax exemption which is somewhere around $11mm. The donor files that return.

There are exclusions where medical or educational expenses are paid directly to the provider, then they do not trigger a reporting requirement. However, no such exception exists for attorney fees.

I am responding only to point out that comments made about the IRS needing to know who funded MBā€™s defense probably would not impact MBā€™s tax liability. And, while they may trigger a reporting requirement by the donor, itā€™s highly likely there is no tax due.

6 Likes

And MB brought a gun to a property inhabited by two drug addicts with a history of criminal violence who had threatened him, and where there was also an aggressive dog with a recent known history of biting. Sounds the same to me.

16 Likes

And donā€™t forget superhero RG pointing a finger trigger at MB just a day or two before.

13 Likes

Yes and itā€™s double for a married couple.

3 Likes

And whatever the farrier heard that didnā€™t make it into the trial like Bilinkas wantedā€¦

13 Likes