Michael Barisone/Lauren Kanarek Civil Suit

[eggbutt]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@MorganSercu

How does an attorney magically represent people who he clearly doesn’t represent?

His client is Lauren Kanarek. Neither Jonathan or Kirby are his clients.

1. Apparently lawyers do this by writing letters on behalf of JK and KK… while also stating in the letter that they really only represent LK. But… they are kinda sorta making an argument concerning motions involving JK be and KK anyway.

2. As far as Jonathan and Kirby not being his clients… at this point… I am beginning to wonder if the simple truth is that JK and KK can’t afford to hire their own attorney. And that’s why they keep on using their daughter’s attorneys to write these letters on their behalf fighting these subpoenas.

It’s a money saving strategy for the Kanareks, because they aren’t really all that wealthy… they are just trying to fit in with a wealthy crowd down in Welly world.

Honestly, if LKs parents are trying to mooch off her and use her attorneys on the cheap to represent them in this situation this far… that’s pretty crappy and not very helpful to LK’s case.

Honestly @Inigo-montoya … stop being such a cheapskate. Go ahead and pony up the cash to just hire representation for yourself and Kirby going forward. You are not putting your daughter in a good legal position with her case by trying to use her attorneys this way.

Since JK brokers/contracts/negotiates everything for his helpless daughter, is it possible GAS has never even spoken with LK and is functioning solely on what he’s been told by JK?

[Omgitsme]

Because he decided trubandloki was LO who will (presumably) be there.

[DownYonder]

Thanks, I thought I had caught up on all the postings, but I guess I missed that one!

[Knights_Mom]

@hut-ho78

@Knights_Mom

@hut-ho78

@Knights_Mom

@Warmblood1

Before yesterday and today’s under handed threats were made by @Inigo-montoya, I was still patiently waiting on IM to deliver on his previous blustering:

One wonders why an individual would feel such a need to bellow hollow threats. What is one compensating for?

At least be good at your craft.

I’m guessing it’s for the same reason they constantly go and “tell” on everyone like little rats. Always wanting to speak to the manager, crying foul (while at the same time laughing at MB for seeking help from police who were probably already swayed by the Karenareks), using every little tactic tried and true.

This bunch of crybabies would have been so more better off just going without engaging in all the drama which ended up with LK shot.

Certainly by now they have to see that NO ONE IS BUYING WHAT THEY’RE SELLING.

Threats, threats and more threats. They should be embarrassed for themselves.

It’s when you post stuff like the police wouldn’t help and post all this stuff about New York eviction process and your experience. You either know the police couldn’t throw LK and RG off the property without an eviction order from the judge or you don’t know as much about the law as you let on.

All the police could do is advise him to start the eviction process.

Your continued attempts at demeaning me will not be successful as I am well confident of my knowledge. Your twisting fails.

Again.

You have no idea of what he was told. You weren’t there. Emergency eviction process was under way, necessitated and able to be done due to the plethora of bad acts by LK.

Her actions were, and remain, indefensible yet here you are locked in servitude to a bad cause. A cause which finds you and those of like mind in a severe minority no matter which corner of social media is found to be having this conversation.

There’s a reason for that. It’s too bad self reflection is not your forte.

So if I say she deserved to be evicted but not shot and that makes me locked in servitude to a bad cause. Is this in comparison to everything you write to justify MB shooting her? Who is in a bad cause here? Perhaps you should do some inner reflection of your own.

I’d say nice try, but it isn’t. We don’t know if MB shot LK. We do know LK got shot. The circumstances as to HOW she got shot We do not know.

Your posting history is full of posts that are IMO disingenuous at best. You don’t follow basic facts and bias colors your posts.

I can’t imagine any legit reason for your continued strenuous postings in support of all things Kanarek. I can tell you it’s not working.

[hut-ho78]

@Knights_Mom

I’m still mulling over the using of 9/11 in this to validate RG as a hero with falsified claims.

A new low.

You would think someone from the tri state area would know better than to do that.

A whole lot of veterans signed up again or tried to after 9/11. If they couldn’t get on active duty, they worked as contractors. One of my old army buddies was killed by an IED doing that.

[trubandloki]

There was so much going on, it was easy to miss that post.

[eggbutt]

He also lied under oath.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

Why in the world would @Inigo-montoya post on this thread trying to “out” someone as LO… if he didn’t actually know for a fact that the person is LO?

The whole thing just makes him look slightly unhinged. It also makes him look like a very angry, and very foolish person, who lacks much in the way of impulse control, all while his daughter is in the midst of a very messy lawsuit.

So weird.

Accusing a poster of being an insider (general or specific) is a way of discrediting their opinion as biased.

You hadn’t noticed that? It works even if the attribution is false.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Accusing a poster of being an insider (general or specific) is a way of discrediting their opinion as biased.

You hadn’t noticed that? It works even if the attribution is false.

So that is what @Inigo-montoya Jonathan Kanarek was trying to do to me last night? Discredit me?

[I_dratherbe]

@CurrentlyHorseless

If it’s a simple argument — everything that exists they have already — short and sweet is more effective than 100 pages with salacious texts.

If this was true, the “simple” reply for JK to the subpoena would be to respond on time and simply say I gave everything I had to the police and the prosecutor and they have since given it to you, not ignore the subpoena. That is the way you normally respond to a subpoena when you have nothing new to produce. As far as I know, that would not apply to KK as I have not seen anything saying that she gave the transcripts to the police and prosecutor.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

@arabhorse2

My father fought in WWII, and those disgusting Stolen Valor lies made me sick to my stomach. I have brothers who have served as well [edit].

My spouse served for over 20 years. He lost a very close friend years ago in an aviation training accident. The investigation into the accident revealed that some of the enlisted maintainers had ongoing drug issues, and it was a contributing factor in a fatal incident. It was a very very very sad situation. And an avoidable situation.

Anyway… people who do drugs while serving in the military? Absolute scum. They let down their fellow service members. People die in training exercises and in actual operational situations when someone else fails to perform their role in a responsible and competent manner. Drug users let down their fellow service members.

Stolen valor is bad. But… if my suspicions are correct, and RG was not honorably discharged, and he continued using drugs while he served in the Marines?

He’s a not a hero. His fellow Marines trusted and relied upon him. And if he used while in uniform, that makes him a weak, selfish, unworthy person. And it’s past time for the entire K family to be quiet about RG’s time as a Marine.

Last thing. Maybe I’m wrong, and this is unfair, and RG was clean the entire time he served, and he was discharged honorably. I’m sure @Inigo-montoya knows if that was the case. So what’s the truth? Will I-M come online to defend the honor of his future son in law, and definitively state what type of discharge RG had?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

Accusing a poster of being an insider (general or specific) is a way of discrediting their opinion as biased.

You hadn’t noticed that? It works even if the attribution is false.

So that is what @Inigo-montoya Jonathan Kanarek was trying to do to me last night? Discredit me?

What is it you do constantly to JK, KK, HH and me?

Harass and annoy.

He was turning the tables to harass and annoy you.

But I’ve noticed you’ve kept up the stupid tagging.

Why is it you’ve never answered my question on how you supposedly know the “homeless” text is from him?

You continue to harass and misrepresent.

[eggbutt]

And prove their thoughts that Michael Barisone is guiding these threads based on you, being Lara Osborne, telling everyone what to post. Gosh Trubandloki, you’ve lost all your power and you’ve helped prove no outsiders or Barisone direct these posts.

[Knights_Mom]

@hut-ho78

@Knights_Mom

I’m still mulling over the using of 9/11 in this to validate RG as a hero with falsified claims.

A new low.

You would think someone from the tri state area would know better than to do that.

A whole lot of veterans signed up again or tried to after 9/11. If they couldn’t get on active duty, they worked as contractors. One of my old army buddies was killed by an IED doing that.

I get that you’re trying to backpeddle but that’s not how IM represented it. He said on 9/11 RG “the hero” called his CO to see what he could do. I imagine by CO IM meant commanding officers and not correctional officer (due to all his arrests). IM then stated that this heroic phone call was more than anyone else did and that made RG better than me/us.

You don’t see a problem with that? You don’t see a problem with making up a story or misrepresenting facts to elevate RG while denigrating us? How would IM know if among us there weren’t heroic military personnel? Heroic police or firemen or anyone else who answered the call that day?

What do you say to THAT?

[MorganSercu]

That’s not how it works; AND you implied that he was active military at the time.

Veterans don’t call CO’s either so another failure of logic.

[MHM]

@3PonyFarm

I believe 3/8 is the next Krol hearing.

I feel like this may have been discussed before, but I don’t remember the answer. Are the Krol hearings open to the public?

Or are they closed to just the person in question and the lawyers/judge?

Or somewhere in between, such that the Ks could show up?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

@BigMama1

Maybe someone else is having a turn using the @Inigo-montoya login tonight. The posts don’t sound very lawyerly…more like aggressive drunk / drug user to me.

But think about it, lots of things that Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) has done so far are not very lawyerly. He has ignored his subpoena twice. Ignored a court order. Sent Ex Parte communication to the judge. And then we have those texts. I mean, how lawyer like is it to wish for people to be homeless? IT kind of seems like that Jonathan Kanarek is better at not acting like a lawyer than he is at acting like a lawyer.

How do you know who sent the text about people being homeless, @trubandloki?

Why didn’t you ask @Inigo-montoya (Jonathan Kanarek) last evening when he was posting?
I think it is quite obvious if you just look at the documents, but if you are not willing to do that, then that is fine, I guess. You can keep wondering.
Jonathan did answer last night with his intent to explain to me why he thinks it is funny to make people homeless when he sees me on the 8th, so maybe I can ask him to explain to you the rest after that?

I have looked at the texts. I can see “incoming” or “outgoing” and the “homeless” text is incoming.

The name is redacted.

You have no way of knowing who it is from, unless you are an insider, like Lara Osborne.

Your continued attributing it to JK is dishonest and harassing.

[MorganSercu]

@MHM

Are the Krol hearings open to the public?

No, they discuss medical issues. None of the Kanarek’s are legally entitled to be there.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

Accusing a poster of being an insider (general or specific) is a way of discrediting their opinion as biased.

You hadn’t noticed that? It works even if the attribution is false.

So that is what @Inigo-montoya Jonathan Kanarek was trying to do to me last night? Discredit me?

What is it you do constantly to JK, KK, HH and me?

Harass and annoy.

He was turning the tables to harass and annoy you.

But I’ve noticed you’ve kept up the stupid tagging.

Why is it you’ve never answered my question on how you supposedly know the “homeless” text is from him?

You continue to harass and misrepresent.

Wow. You are doing that twisting thing again. I responded to a specific comment by you. You said “accusing a poster of being an insider (general or specific) is a way of discrediting their opinion as biased.”

I was commenting on that.

To answer your question, No, that is not what I do to Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya), Kirby Kanarek (@Seeker1), @hut-ho78, or you. Jonathan Kanarek and Kirby Kanarek are who they are. I am not accusing them of anything. Kirby has said all along she is who she says she is, and there is a court document that says that Jonathan Kanarek is @Inigo-montoya.
I know others call you and Hut various people. That is not me. But fun time blaming me. Did you learn this fun blame thing from Jonathan Kanarek?

Is tagging stupid when you do it? Because we both know you have a long history of tagging.

I gave you answer about the text being Jonathan Kanarek. I am sorry you do not like it. Though again, I am not sure why you are asking me, ask @Inigo-montoya. He said we will talk on March 8th. So exciting isn’t it?

Reminder, I am the person who was called someone else all night by @Inigo-montoya, that person who you idolize (which is different than saying he is your idol) . So it is funny that you say I am the person harassing and misrepresenting. But, that is what we all expect from you, over and over and over and over again.

Happy Tuesday!

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

@hut-ho78

@Knights_Mom

I’m still mulling over the using of 9/11 in this to validate RG as a hero with falsified claims.

A new low.

You would think someone from the tri state area would know better than to do that.

A whole lot of veterans signed up again or tried to after 9/11. If they couldn’t get on active duty, they worked as contractors. One of my old army buddies was killed by an IED doing that.

1. @Inigo-montoya claimed in his post yesterday that RG called his CO on 9/11 and asked “where do you need me?” The implication is obviously that RG was still on active duty on 09/11/2001.

2. Yes… many veterans do go on to work as contractors in a variety of roles. However, in order to get these jobs, they invariably must have received an honorable discharge from the military.

So… again… what sort of discharge did RG receive?

This isn’t a hard question. It’s really basic. And… if RG had received an honorable discharge, I think that it would have been mentioned a long time ago. In fact, I strongly suspect that Judge Taylor shut down Bilinkas’ line of questioning about RGs time in the Marine Corps during the criminal trial… in part because RG did not receive an honorable discharge, and Taylor didn’t want that to prejudice the jury when it came to a key witness. So he shut Bilinkas down FAST.