Michael Barisone/Lauren Kanarek Civil Suit

[Omgitsme]

Holy baloney! She’s just telling on herself now.

[cutter99]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@cutter99

I will say this- my husband usually lets me fight my own battles. But if I were as off the rails as good ole @Seeker1 is, he would make the executive decision that it was time for some sort of intervention

I hear you.

But if JK was actually wise enough to intercede when his immediate family members engaged in reckless and self destructive behavior…

Wouldn’t he have done more long ago to shut down Lollypop?

Instead… we have a whole bunch of texts showing that he egged her on when she was clearly off the rails. And during the 48 Hours episode? The guy seemed to be literally preening for the camera, and the whole thing was a train wreck for Lollypop. But he didn’t seem to get it or really care, IMHO. He wanted his 15 minutes.

You would think he would have gotten sweet lil Lollypop to stop posting early on, you know, to help the criminal case itself, but there is a big BUT.

Most of us function quite successfully in society with its moral and social constraints because we assume, very correctly I might add, that the rules apply to us as well as all others.

The Kanareks seem to very confidently feel the rules never apply to them. EVER.

This is a classic example of what not to do or how to behave when functioning as a human.

[Ambitious_Kate]

Seems like our friends skedaddled. Regroup! Regroup!

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

Totally.

I wonder what is brewing for next week, other than the Krol hearing? Hopefully we get to see a response to the GAS motion.

[Ambitious_Kate]

@cutter99

This is a classic example of what not to do or how to behave when functioning as a human.

Functioning? The K’s and their - ehr - familiars - are a far cry from functioning well has humans.

[cutter99]

[Knights_Mom]

@Sdel

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

And then Maybe SafeSport got nervous about all these communications and allegations coming from the Kanareks… and they reached out to CPS to check on MHGs kids.

This amused the H.E.Double hockey stick out of me LOL

Clerk 1 Lawyer 0

[Jenerationx]

An attorney that doesn’t understand that in a one party consent state, they actually need consent of one party IN THE CONVERSATION to record, not the consent of a party that is not having the conversation. What state bar did he pass? The tapes have been excluded from everything because they’re ILLEGALLY recorded.

[Sdel]

@Fiesta01

@Salty

What is “assist principle education?”

Volunteer Sunday School teacher? As in helps children learn Christian principles?

Scary idea considering……

[Knights_Mom]

@Jenerationx

An attorney that doesn’t understand that in a one party consent state, they actually need consent of one party IN THE CONVERSATION to record, not the consent of a party that is not having the conversation. What state bar did he pass? The tapes have been excluded from everything because they’re ILLEGALLY recorded.

I have no doubt he knows what the law is and instead was trying to Slick Willy a bull**** answer hoping he could get over and fool people.

[Ambitious_Kate]

Or maybe he’s just really not all that bright. Its not like smart thinkers have shown themselves in that family. I’m still a little stunned by the “assist principle” thing. I can imagine the typos in the audio transcript. And the daughter Lauren isn’t a real big thinker if her plans to make money off of MBarisone show anything.

[hut-ho78]

@Jenerationx

Deleting a post that has been replied to in a conversation is bad internet etiquette.

Oh no. How horrible. We mustn’t have anything in the Barisone threads that would fall outside of good etiquette. /s

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@Sdel

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

And then Maybe SafeSport got nervous about all these communications and allegations coming from the Kanareks… and they reached out to CPS to check on MHGs kids.

This amused the H.E.Double hockey stick out of me LOL

Clerk 1 Lawyer 0

He’s talking about getting criminal charges dismissed if LK were ever criminally charged for the recordings, KM. LK was never criminally charged.

Criminal charges are different from a civil suit.

Clerk 0 Lawyer 1

[Ambitious_Kate]

@CurrentlyHorseless

He’s talking about getting criminal charges dismissed if LK were ever criminally charged for the recordings, KM. LK was never criminally charged.Criminal charges are different from a civil suit.

You’re so clever, where do you come up with these ideas? Thank goodness you are here to explain it all.

And you’re both back! And Together!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

Did you call Seeker a liar over the issue of exactly how much damaged breast tissue had to be removed?

I did not “subtly” or overtly “posit that there is a legitimate reason for two adults to cyberstalk and harass two minors.”

Just read what I wrote.

@seeker1 clearly stated during the discussion on this thread that LK’s entire breast was removed.

There is testimony at trial that casts doubt on this claim. Also, LK herself hasn’t ever made this claim. She has talked about her IMPLANT being removed.

A day after Seeker’s initial claim about an ENTIRE breast being removed, she seemed to walk it back in other comments.

@Seeker1 was questioned by many people on this topic. She stopped responding to questions at a certain point, however.

Given all that… at this point… I will go on the record and state I do think @Seeker1 lied when she stated LKs entire breast was removed.

As for you, you specifically said of LK and RG’s attempts to contact and engage with MHG’s minor children on social media, “ Sending friend requests and liking posts is not necessarily cyberstalking. It would depend on the circumstances .”

So… please explain the possible circumstances you alluded to, circumstances which would amount to a benign reason for LK and RGs behavior on social media with respect to MHG’s children.

Thanks, VHM, for dropping the claim that I ever said or implied that it was acceptable to cyberstalk or harass minor children.

Re: your calling Seeker a liar. It seems unavoidable that the surgeons had to remove a significant amount of damaged tissue and sew up what was left. IMHO for someone to call
a mother a liar over a discrepancy as to whether all or much of the breast tissue was removed is … callous.

I have seen many, many statements written here that I strongly suspect are lies. I don’t go around labeling the poster a liar unless I’m in a position to know for certain the statement is untrue.

Several posters have thrown the label liar at me in instances in which I have not lied. Calling someone a liar in instances in which they’re clearly not, or in instances in which things are uncertain, is smear tactic #5 on these threads.

But it shows us who you are.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Ambitious_Kate

@CurrentlyHorseless

He’s talking about getting criminal charges dismissed if LK were ever criminally charged for the recordings, KM. LK was never criminally charged.Criminal charges are different from a civil suit.

You’re so clever, where do you come up with these ideas? Thank goodness you are here to explain it all.

And you’re both back! And Together!

I’m not a lawyer, but neither am I an idiot. Oh, were you being sarcastic?

Any non idiot would understand that IM was talking about criminal charges, and not a civil suit.

[eggbutt]

@Knights_Mom

@Sdel

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

And then Maybe SafeSport got nervous about all these communications and allegations coming from the Kanareks… and they reached out to CPS to check on MHGs kids.

This amused the H.E.Double hockey stick out of me LOL

Clerk 1 Lawyer 0

The part that amused me most was, The tapes will be played.

I didn’t hear them, did you? Apparently the entire prosecution legal team knew it would be very dangerous to play the tapes. If Jonathan Kanarek was so eager and confident of the tapes being made public, why is he still not complying with subpoenas regarding the tapes and transcript the lovely Mrs Kanarek allegedly transcribed?

[cutter99]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

Did you call Seeker a liar over the issue of exactly how much damaged breast tissue had to be removed?

I did not “subtly” or overtly “posit that there is a legitimate reason for two adults to cyberstalk and harass two minors.”

Just read what I wrote.

@seeker1 clearly stated during the discussion on this thread that LK’s entire breast was removed.

There is testimony at trial that casts doubt on this claim. Also, LK herself hasn’t ever made this claim. She has talked about her IMPLANT being removed.

A day after Seeker’s initial claim about an ENTIRE breast being removed, she seemed to walk it back in other comments.

@Seeker1 was questioned by many people on this topic. She stopped responding to questions at a certain point, however.

Given all that… at this point… I will go on the record and state I do think @Seeker1 lied when she stated LKs entire breast was removed.

As for you, you specifically said of LK and RG’s attempts to contact and engage with MHG’s minor children on social media, “ Sending friend requests and liking posts is not necessarily cyberstalking. It would depend on the circumstances .”

So… please explain the possible circumstances you alluded to, circumstances which would amount to a benign reason for LK and RGs behavior on social media with respect to MHG’s children.

Thanks, VHM, for dropping the claim that I ever said or implied that it was acceptable to cyberstalk or harass minor children.

Re: your calling Seeker a liar. It seems unavoidable that the surgeons had to remove a significant amount of damaged tissue and sew up what was left. IMHO for someone to call
a mother a liar over a discrepancy as to whether all or much of the breast tissue was removed is … callous.

I have seen many, many statements written here that I strongly suspect are lies. I don’t go around labeling the poster a liar unless I’m in a position to know for certain the statement is untrue.

Several posters have thrown the label liar at me in instances in which I have not lied. Calling someone a liar in instances in which they’re clearly not, or in instances in which things are uncertain, is smear tactic #5 on these threads.

But it shows us who you are.

Bolded by me.

Oh the irony, and lack of self reflection by this poster is absolutely stunning. And not in a good way!

[cutter99]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Ambitious_Kate

@CurrentlyHorseless

He’s talking about getting criminal charges dismissed if LK were ever criminally charged for the recordings, KM. LK was never criminally charged.Criminal charges are different from a civil suit.

You’re so clever, where do you come up with these ideas? Thank goodness you are here to explain it all.

And you’re both back! And Together!

I’m not a lawyer, but neither am I an idiot. Oh, were you being sarcastic?

Any non idiot would understand that IM was talking about criminal charges, and not a civil suit.

.

[Sdel]

@cutter99

Oh the irony, and lack of self reflection by this poster is absolutely stunning. And not in a good way!

Reminiscent of another poster….