Michael Barisone/Lauren Kanarek Civil Suit

[jvanrens]

@Ambitious_Kate

@arktos19

Well, no…. Not really.

dis·in·gen·u·ous

/ˌdisənˈjenyəwəs/

adjective

1. not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does.

“he was being somewhat disingenuous as well as cynical”

Or, pretending to care or be sincere about something when one actually doesn’t and has an ulterior motive. Such as, pretending to care about participating in the topics of these threads when actually wanting to insert disinformation into the conversational stream. That too is disingenuous.

Like KK wanting us to PM her our real names so she could pray for us or some such drivel?

[Maria]

I’m serious, they keep using words above my pay grade.

Goes to show ya never stop learning.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@cheval_convert

Now I have to get out my google dictionary.

If you find out how “babble” can be “fetid”, please inform the class.

I know what those two words mean, but don’t understand how “fetid” can describe “babble”.

[trubandloki]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

On the Kanareks talking to Tarshis at a horse show, I’ve already said that they were probably conveying what they’d already conveyed here, that the Kanareks consider MB a victim of his own mental breakdown, which resulted in the shooting and tragically affected many lives, including the friends and family of the principals.

It doesn’t matter if the Ks approached Tarsis to discuss world peace. It is highly irregular, improper and extremely questionable to approach a witness on an upcoming trial in which your family member is the alleged victim.

This act cannot be made proper. It cannot be defended. It is simply wrong and I find it annoying there were no repercussions from it. There should have been.

Add that the first person doing the approaching was Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya), who is a lawyer and should know better. Period.
He does so many things that anyone who made it thru law school should know is just plain wrong.

[Knights_Mom]

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@cheval_convert

Now I have to get out my google dictionary.

If you find out how “babble” can be “fetid”, please inform the class.

I know what those two words mean, but don’t understand how “fetid” can describe “babble”.

Thank you for this statement as it serves as a perfect example.

[eggbutt]

@CurrentlyHorseless

You will find that the frequency with which I post that position is strictly less than the frequency with which you or someone else posts that there is no evidence that MB shot her.

Yeppo!!! Do you know why? Because there is no evidence he shot anyone! Nada, nil, zip, zero, nothing, not one iota, smidgen, etc. No forensic evidence to support your mantra. Get used to this point of no evidence, because there is a really good chance you will hear it a lot in the coming months. And guess what @CurrentlyHorseless, it is a fact that there is no evidence. We understand you have issues with some facts but that is your problem alone.

[smoofox]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

On the Kanareks talking to Tarshis at a horse show, I’ve already said that they were probably conveying what they’d already conveyed here, that the Kanareks consider MB a victim of his own mental breakdown, which resulted in the shooting and tragically affected many lives, including the friends and family of the principals.

It doesn’t matter if the Ks approached Tarsis to discuss world peace. It is highly irregular, improper and extremely questionable to approach a witness on an upcoming trial in which your family member is the alleged victim.

This act cannot be made proper. It cannot be defended. It is simply wrong and I find it annoying there were no repercussions from it. There should have been.

The Kanareks do not see MB as a victim - that has been made very clear. Oh, they can put on an act of earnest handwringing about it and fuss about MHG - but that is all it is. LK had repeatedly torpedoed any such notion with her rants and rages. This rather feeble - and yes, disingenuous - attempt by them to interfere with Tarshis is obvious to everyone except those who seem to want to bend over backwards to make excuses for everyone and everything LK is associated with.

@hut-ho78

@Maria

Then how could LK be quoting and posting on social media almost exact conversations that she was not part of?

Because I think they were almost exactly repeated back to LK and RG whether in sympathy or in spite. Barn gossip. Say something at one end of the barn and hear it again from someone else by the time you get to the far end of the barn.

Barn gossip - is never verbatim. Not even from the original “reporter”. The idea that it is is rather amusing. I have managed two farms over the years and worked on another big one… and there is a reason that barn gossip is called gossip. Right now a friend and I are being personally affected by some barn gossip from last summer that is not factual and not even remotely close to any conversation that was ever had. And the original gossiper was standing right there in the middle of the conversation - and still got it wrong. She has embellished that to everyone else she has blathered to and it has continued to get changed along the way. When her gossip made the circle and got back to me - I was also confuzzled… and noted that not one item in the gossip was in any way accurate…

So yeah - barn gossip should never be mistaken for 100% truth.

@BigMama1

How is it “trash talk” when the Kanareks themselves are discussing the recordings via text message? Why would you just choose to ignore the fact they have testified to the existence of recordings and are on record discussing them? It’s bizarre.

It is obvious that hut-ho believes that the Kanareks are simply liars and thus part of the EIM. That seems to be the only possible explanation for this extremely bizarre assertion.

[trubandloki]

Stop it CC. There is no place in this discussion for something that logical.

[trubandloki]

@hut-ho78

Recordings? All trash talk except for the ones added to the house that LE saw and testified recorded to the cloud and that RG said were not working at the time as he had turned them off.

Are you not aware that even the lawyer for Lauren Kanarek says there are recordings. Is he lying too? Actually both lawyers (Bruce and GAS) have admitted there are recordings. The prosecution from the criminal trial is who provided all of the recordings that are in evidence now.

Are all of them lying? Only you know the truth?

[roseymare]

Well this is an um interesting new twist. The recordings are all bluff. Things that make you go MMMM.

[trubandloki]

@BigMama1

@hut-ho78

Recordings? All trash talk except for the ones added to the house that LE saw and testified recorded to the cloud and that RG said were not working at the time as he had turned them off.

How is it “trash talk” when the Kanareks themselves are discussing the recordings via text message? Why would you just choose to ignore the fact they have testified to the existence of recordings and are on record discussing them? It’s bizarre.

Weren’t the illegal recordings, including discussion of their locations, and how to make the usable in court one of the topics in the recording of the meeting with the Eye Witness?
So weird that the Kanarek family would be talking about that with a lawyer when no recordings actually existed.

[eggbutt]

Hmmm, if there are no illegal recordings per @hut-ho78, what did Kirby transcribe and send to USEF before the shooting? Where is the recording she transcribed because apparently what was sent to USEF doesn’t match any recordings turned over to the defense. How can that be explained?

Mental telepathy?

[smoofox]

@trubandloki

@hut-ho78

Recordings? All trash talk except for the ones added to the house that LE saw and testified recorded to the cloud and that RG said were not working at the time as he had turned them off.

Are you not aware that even the lawyer for Lauren Kanarek says there are recordings. Is he lying too? Actually both lawyers (Bruce and GAS) have admitted there are recordings. The prosecution from the criminal trial is who provided all of the recordings that are in evidence now.

Are all of them lying? Only you know the truth?

All of them are obviously lying - including all the talk about transcripts as you cannot get a transcript from a recording that was never ever made.

Hut-ho - I am beginning to think that lately you are just trolling for gits and shiggles … otherwise you would’ve made this bizarre declaration a very long time ago.

ETA: I do think that some of LK’s howling about recordings was a bluff… but recordings obviously do exist.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

@CurrentlyHorseless

You will find that the frequency with which I post that position is strictly less than the frequency with which you or someone else posts that there is no evidence that MB shot her.

Yeppo!!! Do you know why? Because there is no evidence he shot anyone! Nada, nil, zip, zero, nothing, not one iota, smidgen, etc. No forensic evidence to support your mantra. Get used to this point of no evidence, because there is a really good chance you will hear it a lot in the coming months. And guess what @CurrentlyHorseless, it is a fact that there is no evidence. We understand you have issues with some facts but that is your problem alone.

OK, @eggbutt. I was explaining that I sometimes but not always bring up the NGRI verdict, which indicates that the jury found sufficient evidence that he shot her to reject the NG verdict, in response to people like you asserting that “there is no evidence he shot anyone”.

Hence the frequency you will hear my refrain is strictly less than the frequency you and others assert your claim.

Since we are supposed to have moved on to discussing the civil trial, do you think that the issue of whether he shot her will be relitigated or do you think collateral estoppel will be invoked?

[Unfforgettable]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I know what those two words mean, but don’t understand how “fetid” can describe “babble”.

Stinky word salad?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Unfforgettable

@CurrentlyHorseless

I know what those two words mean, but don’t understand how “fetid” can describe “babble”.

Stinky word salad?

Well, it’s clear it was an insult. A rather nonsensical insult, but perhaps all that matters to @Knights_Mom is the insult.

[3PonyFarm]

https://morristowngreen.com/2023/02/16/morristown-realtor-loses-license-over-state-conviction-in-pay-to-play-sting/

What do you think about Judge T’s comments at this woman’s sentencing? Apparently the Real Estate Commision did not share his views and reacted harsher than he did.

[roseymare]

Licensing commissions often have stricter requirements than the actual law.

[3PonyFarm]

Very interesting to know!