Michael Barisone/Lauren Kanarek Civil Suit

[Sdel]

@ekat

@Joanne

In the Attorney Deininger page listed above, any idea what “Facebook fee” should actually be

Probably Facebook page.

Feed. 20,000 page Facebook feed.

[Sdel]

@Davignport

I wonder what GAS is thinking after reading these? You would think at some point, if he is any kind of attorney, he must be thinking “what the Hell did I get myself into here?”.

I think he is doing what he is doing in order to protect himself from a malpractice lawsuit once the K’s lose. Even if it isn’t conventional, he can at least point back and say, I did what they asked, even if it wasn’t correct or advised.

[Mondo]

@Omgitsme

Does that mean JK’s letter (email, whatever) that he sent to Sceusi was also sent to Taylor?
Why would a letter pertaining to the civil case be given to a judge who is involved in the criminal case?

I’m 100 posts behind, so maybe someone else pointed this out already, but I am certain that long ago, in maybe one or two previous threads, LK posted herself about writing a “victim statement” to the judge. Does no one else recall that?

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

I THINK I recollect Lollypop posting about this in one of her YouTube commenting sprees last June.

ETA- I think she was banned from COTH by then.

[StB.YM]

@MHM

I can only admire his editing ability if he managed to weed out just 50 or so exhibits from LK’s voluminous Facebook posts.

I suspect that these 50 exhibits are pages and pages of posts - not 1 exhibit per post (purely going off how evidence was entered at exhibits in the JD/AH trial).

[KurPlexed]

Silver:

[eggbutt]

Wouldn’t Michael have been involved in selecting those posts indicating those that worried him the most? For sure The Manifest must be included!

[catzndogz22]

She’s busy touting her book.

[trubandloki]

@Joanne

That is an unfair statement about the defense team “not asking questions and/or fully explore issues” . . . They would have if not been shut down by Judge Taylor many times.

It is a truthful statement.
They were unable to ask them, true. But they did not ask and fully explore.
I doubt anyone on Michael’s team finds that line upsetting.

@Knights_Mom

This was so my system for naming motions. But I suggest numbering the motions because soon you’ll be getting Opps and Replies on the same papers.

I think the dates at the end of the name are what keeps them clear which is which.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

I wonder if she used the same photographer for that picture as was used for the LK photos involving the ugly floral blouse that ran in the NYT puff piece.

And put on a helmet and a pair of boots, ffs.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@trubandloki

I agree!

I wonder how our posters here who have been insisting on collateral estoppel all along will respond to this.

I wonder if all those posters have ESPN.

I know I have ESPN. That’s how I knew:

1. To create that fake LinkedIn profile for JK all the way back in 2011.
2. That Mr. Silver would be filing a response to GAS’s motion today.

Now… do we think my ESPN skills will be enough for me to score a hat trick? If so, I’m going to guess that during her deposition… Lollypop will be asked questions about:

1)What is her annual reported income to the IRS?
2) Who pays for the board, vet and farrier expenses every month for her horses? Essentially… who’s checking account does the money come from for those luxury hobby expenses each and every time a bill is paid for one of Lollypop’s horses?
3) What type of primary health insurance coverage does she use?

Those are really boring and basic questions. I know. I’m sorry if other readers are bored with my continuing fixation on simple bean counting issues when it comes to this entire case. But… I am really curious about the answers to those 3 questions. I think someone should ask Lollypop those three questions under oath during a deposition. If there is nothing to hide… then it should be REALLY EASY for her to answer those three questions during a deposition, when she is under oath. If there IS something slippery going on, however, I think those three questions might be the equivalent of pulling that little thread on the top of the feed bag… it seems like such a small thing, and the feed bag seems like it’s totally secured shut… but if you just tug on the end of that one little thread… the whole bag opens right up and grain spills EVERYWHERE.

Well, I don’t have ESPN, but I do have HBO.

[MorganSercu]

Filed by GAS today.

[Einhorn]

@Jealoushe

It’s a very strange stance for a judge to make I would think? Or is it common they are outspoken after trial?

In my experience, which is not in NJ, when judges get to having feelings about attorneys, it does lead to the judge very much scrutinizing that attorneys work.
I have also witnessed first hand- as in i was opposing counsel on the case- a judge do a one-eighty on two cases with essentially identical facts because the defense attorney and the judge didn’t like each other.

It was shocking to me, even though it meant the judge granted my motion.

[Angela_Freda]

@Knights_Mom

That’s a wee bit over 6 months of $5,000 monthly horse board payments being at HH.

Which I imagine was cheap compared to wherever she boards now, unless strongarm Daddio brokered a better deal.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

WTF.

This is weird from GAS. It says the same thing as the other motion says. Except not as well.

Did LK or JK write this?

It doesn’t seem like an attorney wrote this.

[Angela_Freda]

@MHM

Wasn’t it Taylor who got that comment section shut down at the time?

If so, whose privacy was he trying to protect, since now he seems so unconcerned about MB’s right to privacy regarding his mental health?

[Jealoushe]

Thank you for sharing first hand experience.

[SoCoPony]

“Only wants to tell her story”

Which one would that be??

Goodness so many laughs today, but I am only a horse of course.

[BrownDerby]

Hawking it to preteens. Nice.

[Angela_Freda]

@eggbutt

I would pay to watch him depose Miss Kanarek

Funds payable to Barisone legal fund.