in my neck if the woods…
1 Like
That is not how this works, that is not how any of this works.
19 Likes
I don’t even get the point of the barring then if she wants to “tell her story” because that is a part of the story, is it not? Perhaps not her story, because it is, naturally, skewed.
I actually don’t see the point of the barring in general after this latest filing from GAS and it just seems like a huge waste of time. If LK is embarrassed by her own actions, then so be it. Sometimes that happens in life. It’s also not harassment. I get that to some people, anything unwanted, inconvenient, or unflattering is considered harassment, but that’s not the case.
If LK didn’t provoke MB there should or would be nothing to talk about. If she did, then there will be. SGF is entitled to ask her whatever they wish to and objections can occur as necessary. This isn’t the criminal trial. They weren’t party to that. She may have to answer some of the same questions or revisit matters. I don’t think that’s unreasonable.
27 Likes
but, but, but, doesn’t she get to write the law they way she wants it??
but, but, but what about the opportunity to tell 48 hours all about it.
but, but, but, what about the opportunity to show all the videos/tapes etc at the trial, you know bombshells.
but, but, but, but.
Buck Fart.
28 Likes
Gosh. So much going on. I can not imagine what Michael’s legal bills are.
Thank goodness that people realize how expensive this is and are willing to donate to the GFM.
11 Likes
Discovery is not harassment
For our tshirts?
18 Likes
While riding bareback without a helmet, or even shoes. Just a dress and lots of makeup.
This is NOT the example I want my 12 year old to see when it comes to adult horsewomen. Absolutely not.
19 Likes
Looks like she got the very best legal representation her “unlimited means” could afford, and it shows.
/s in case it wasn’t clear to the general readership. Sometimes words can’t do what a raised eyebrow can accomplish.
16 Likes
I assumed typo, meant to read “feed”
2 Likes
While her previous lawyer wipes his brow and exhales, “phew!”
4 Likes
Then why are JK and KK withholding the transcripts and recordings?
GAS’s new filing is wild. Where is that fruitbat hiding?
22 Likes
Disarmed
17 Likes
I do!!
5 Likes
23 Likes
< raises hand and waves it around like a kindergartener wanting to use the toilet room >
Me.
Pick me.
I have an answer.
Because those recordings and transcripts do not tell the right version of her story.
23 Likes
But…
Krol hearings do not have victim impact statements.
That is not the point of a Krol hearing.
11 Likes
Remember the scene in “The Hunt for Red October” where the Russian captain fires a torpedo at Red October and Sean Connery’s character turns toward the Russian sub, causing the torpedo to do a 180 to follow the Red October right back to the Russian sub and blows it up? Well, that’s what’s going on with all the Kanarek bombshells!
Honestly, I think the Kanareks are really, really worried about the illegal surveillance and the Finish the Bastard plan. I guess she has never really sued someone who called her bluff and said, “bring it on!” only to find herself in very deep water.
25 Likes
Exactly, they need to depose her again to get her on record picking one!
7 Likes
I read that whole thing. It essentially just reiterates the previous filing, not to mention, it asks for EXACTLY what Silver’s filing says it can’t legally ask for. It also doubles down on the whole “asked in the criminal case so shouldn’t have to repeat herself,” BS when Silver clearly states that SGF was NOT a party to the criminal case and therefore is well within its rights to depose the Plaintiff on any subject relevant to her claims.
Ya know, 50 years ago or so, my Dad used to encourage me to be a lawyer. My fascination with true crime and this case in particular, has me wondering if he was right. Sigh. We’ll never know.
22 Likes
I’m not that far but it’s vaccination day at the barn. 
2 Likes
