Michael Barisone/Lauren Kanarek Civil Suit

[Maria]

The attorneys will pick and chose the most important ones to prove their case. They will offer those exhibits up and ask for them to be admitted. If there is no objection from the other side the judge will allow that exhibit to be entered into evidence and then it becomes part of the official record.

Having the depositions done before the hearing will help the attorneys decide which exhibits will be used.

I am sure the attorneys will know those sm posts backwards and forwards, if during the hearing a witness lets slip out, the attorney can dig out another exhibit.

[trubandloki]

@Knights_Mom

An attorney would never use first names. EVER

Could GAS being using Lauren Kanarek’s first name in an attempt to make her seem more… well… um… human? More normal?

[Knights_Mom]

@trubandloki

@Knights_Mom

An attorney would never use first names. EVER

Could GAS being using Lauren Kanarek’s first name in an attempt to make her seem more… well… um… human? More normal?

Besides the fact that nothing will make her look more human IMO, the answer is NO. It’s just not done. They would be addressed as plaintiff, plaintiff Kanarek or Kanarek.

Never by first name.

On the cross it would be role, role + last name or just last name.

[roseymare]

I rode barefoot once. Got a big ole horsefly bite on my toe!

[MHM]

@Maria

I am sure the attorneys will know those sm posts backwards and forwards

Oof. That would be a lot of brain cell storage space to waste on something so hideous.

[trubandloki]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

I don’t mean to be cold… but the judge really shouldn’t be basing rulings on a sense of personal connection, and feelings of sympathy for either the plaintiff or the defendant in this case. Just my opinion.

But… it worked with Taylor so why not try it here?

[Knights_Mom]

I get a sense this judge is vastly different from Taylor.

[ninakl]

You are incapable of producing word salads. You write short, succinct paragraphs and I enjoy reading your posts.

[MHM]

@Knights_Mom

I get a sense this judge is vastly different from Taylor.

Fingers crossed.

[Angela_Freda]

Is that legal for someone to present material as being written by a lawyer when it wasn’t?

[LilRanger]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

So Deininger wants to make oral arguments on 03/17?

Jesus, if I were the judge I’d sign that form of order so dang fast…

The last thing any judge needs is these three arguing about this. Stone will take his lumps and we’ll all get on with depositions, please. If stone is feeling his oats he’ll make lk pay for one of his trusted staff to attend for a contracted Florida based attorney/staff to attend in person so she follows the rules.

[BigMama1]

@DownYonder

And to add to my post above about LexisNexis - it also has a product that links all your social media accounts together via LexID. And if you create an alter for one platform and your alter is proven to be you - either by your own admission or by legal/LE means, then the alter is also linked to you - again making it hard to hide on SM platforms, esp. from legal action.

Fascinating. So if I provided someone who has LN access with a name, email address and Facebook account, it might link to other accounts from the same person under a different name. Hmmmm…

[MHM]

@LilRanger

one of his trusted staff to attend for a contracted Florida based attorney/staff to attend in person so she follows the rules.

Good luck to that person.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

I think Stone also requested opportunity for oral argument on 03/17 -

I might be confused though. IANAL .

Anyway… are you saying the judge should ignore all this noise and just rule on it already and say no to oral arguments?

[LilRanger]

@Angela_Freda

Is that legal for someone to present material as being written by a lawyer when it wasn’t?

If the lawyer has read it and signed it, she is saying it’s OK.

[LilRanger]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

Anyway… are you saying the judge should ignore all this noise and just rule on it already and say no to oral arguments?

Yes, if that’s an option he has. But I’m pissy like that!

[LilRanger]

@BigMama1

Fascinating. So if I provided someone who has LN access with a name, email address and Facebook account, it might link to other accounts from the same person under a different name. Hmmmm…

The way that was formatted, it looks like a lawsuit. Just not one from NJ. I don’t know for sure, but that’s my take, some sort of complaint.

[Jenerationx]

To me it reads as if JK may have written it and is considering the family or himself to be the plaintiff.

[MHM]

@Jenerationx

To me it reads as if JK may have written it and is considering the family or himself to be the plaintiff.

If so, maybe that’s why he figures they can tag team on a single lawyer.

[Christa_P]

With the jury I was on we had access to thousands of text messages that were admitted into evidence, but we’re not directly refered to in the testimony. In our case, a block of messages would be admitted into evidence so the prosecution could use some of them.

(NOTE: I refer to the prosecution only because the defense did very little)