Me too! I wanted to attribute it to the EIM but couldn’t figure out how to do it (must be because I am really elderly and technologically challenged).
This ^
I’ve never posted on YouTube. Only started posting on this forum because we boarded around the corner from Barisone’s farm and had mutual professional associations.
I’m curious as to HH and CH’s associations and if they don’t have any, why the devotedness to LK et at…
Y’all have convenient memory lapses. During the trial y’all were posting on both YouTube and here and bragging about and chortling over your posts on YouTube. I doubt that has stopped. I’ve even heard some people here have devoted their Twitter feed to vilifying a shooting victim, LK.
Links?
You seem to have missed the point.
I’m so very glad that I could give your conscience a bit of relief.
Me too! I wanted to attribute it to the EIM but couldn’t figure out how to do it (must be because I am really elderly and technologically challenged).
Same! I wanted to contribute as SillyHorse, but wound up just doing it anonymously a few times.
Would someone explain how to donate using an “alias?”
I did the Elderly Illegal Mob donation
And I’m not even in the mob. Or maybe I am
Haha well done!
Seriously??? Weren’t there posts here saying oh no, no one is negative against the judge on YT? So evidence, which is always demanded, was posted including posts from the female Kanareks. Rather than slide back from the statement that there are no negative posts on YT, you double-down and decide it is all CoTH posters setting up fake accounts. Do you really think before posting?
Several comments posted were KK, without anonymity, discussing MHG.
Didn’t you say there was a court order preventing her from
“discussing” MHG?
I can imagine a court order barring someone from “contacting”
MHG, but I can’t really imagine one that bars “discussing” someone.
[Edit]
Why hasn’t Elon Musk obtained a court order preventing his stalker from posting his flight plans on the internet in real time?
Leaving aside LK and MHG, when has anyone ever obtained a court order barring someone else from “discussing” them?
Y’all have convenient memory lapses. During the trial y’all were posting on both YouTube and here and bragging about and chortling over your posts on YouTube. I doubt that has stopped. I’ve even heard some people here have devoted their Twitter feed to vilifying a shooting victim, LK.
Thanks for posting a couple of my old posts above. Except for the “illegal mob” comment, they state very well where these threads have sunk so low
Yeah, I agree that making totally vauge and unproven accusations is a low point. I’d ask you to back up your claim with proof, but we all know that’s not your style.
Some folks are either too dull-witted to “get it,” or they like being willfully ignorant because it absolves them of the responsibility to use logic that may lead to them changing their mind on a particular point. But what it really does is show how slow-witted and foolish they are.
Now THAT I can agree with.
hut-ho78:Y’all have convenient memory lapses. During the trial y’all were posting on both YouTube and here and bragging about and chortling over your posts on YouTube. I doubt that has stopped. I’ve even heard some people here have devoted their Twitter feed to vilifying a shooting victim, LK.
Thanks for posting a couple of my old posts above. Except for the “illegal mob” comment, they state very well where these threads have sunk so low.
Nope! Never did! Another blatant blanket assumption! Who exactly is “y’all”, Huh? Explain and provide proof or admit you love to exaggerate and provoke!
and how is your Twitter feed doing @eggbutt? You are too funny.
With regards to Elon Musk, flight information is public with the exception of certain government/military sensitive flights.
Someone on these forums told me how but I don’t remember
I’m curious as to HH and CH’s associations and if they don’t have any, why the devotedness to LK et at…
This has been pondered multiple times with no clear answer.
With regards to Elon Musk, flight information is public with the exception of certain government/military sensitive flights.
Yes, I know that. Some college kid is posting on Facebook or Twitter or somewhere the real time flight schedule of Musks private jet. It puts Musk at risk of being assassinated by some nut job.
If Musk cannot get a court order preventing the kid from posting that information, why should I believe Eggbutt’s claim that MHG has a court order preventing LK and “her family” from “discussing” MHG?
There’s another substantial leap.
You might consider taking up steeplechasing.
That is a fantastic response. Another thing to be embroidered on a pillow!
DownYonder:I have no doubt that Mr. D and Mr. Silver are going to absolutely convince the civil jury that LK was more than 51% liable for the incident that led to her injuries.
I think it is very unlikely that the defendants will convince the jury LK was more than 51% responsible.
Both KK and JK have pointed out the stress placed on MB by MHG demanding he “get rid of her” and threatening to leave if he didn’t.
Am I saying MHG “caused” his insanity? No, I’m not. I’m saying if the provocations that “pushed him over the edge” are going to be litigated in the civil case, LK would have have named MHG as a defendant. Not for conspiracy, but for causing the insanity.
She’s not named as a defendant because determining what combination of factors caused MBs insanity is not possible.
Well, I guess that means you think the jury in the criminal trial was made up of Elderly Illegal Mob members.
The service didn’t find the bug by the dumpster because they didn’t look by the dumpster.
(What kind of client does this?)
Per the text that is part of the exhibits in an earlier filing.
To me, the most logical explanation for the search results was that whoever planted the bugs then heard the discussion about the bug sweeper company coming ahead of time, and removed the bugs before the company got there.
You know, while doing “night check” in the middle of the night, or “wrapping the horse” after hours, or doing ninja duty, or what have you.