Michael Barisone

[ladyj79]

@carman_liz

Does “The North” remember though?? Lolol points for anyone that gets the reference!!

It’s only been a year :lol:

[merrygoround]

@ladyj79

You dont know Michael, but because of things you read on the internets you feel bad for him that he shot a woman twice in the chest?

Man, I hope you don’t ever sit on a jury.

You don’t know the circumstances, I don’t know the circumstances…

Yes.she got shot but neither you, nor I, nor it would appear any one on this BB, knows how it happened.

[ladyj79]

@merrygoround

You don’t know the circumstances, I don’t know the circumstances…

Yes.she got shot but neither you, nor I, nor it would appear any one on this BB, knows how it happened.

But if you admittedly don’t know the circumstances, why did you say you felt bad for michael barisone—who shot a woman—when as you just stated, you dont know what happened?

Do you understand how ignorant and callous that sounds?

[YankeeDuchess]

@merrygoround

You don’t know the circumstances, I don’t know the circumstances…

Yes.she got shot but neither you, nor I, nor it would appear any one on this BB, knows how it happened.

There’s a lot we don’t know, but we know she got shot and nearly died, and as a result the criminal justice system has kept MB in jail ever since.

[merrygoround]

@ladyj79

But if you admittedly don’t know the circumstances, why did you say you felt bad for michael barisone—who shot a woman—when as you just stated, you dont know what happened?

Do you understand how ignorant and callous that sounds?

Perhaps because of her past history, and continuing actions.

[ladyj79]

@merrygoround

Perhaps because of her past history, and continuing actions.

your personal knowledge of which is based on what?

And again, you feel badly for michael --whom you also dont know–that he shot a woman twice in the chest, nearly killing her?

[ladyj79]

I dont want to go back and pour through these threads but I have 100% already had this conversation with another new low count poster by yet another name.

[Denali6298]

Wow! I get judging LK from her posts, but to put one’s sympathy with a person one doesn’t know is just…

[Mardi]

@ladyj79

You dont know Michael, but because of things you read on the internets you feel bad for him that he shot a woman twice in the chest?

Man, I hope you don’t ever sit on a jury.

It’s entirely possible to sit on a jury, listen to all the evidence, feel empathy for the defendant, and still vote to convict him/her.

[Mardi]

@ladyj79

I dont want to go back and pour through these threads but I have 100% already had this conversation with another new low count poster by yet another name.

So funny how you slam people, then say you don’t want to have the conversation again.

[ladyj79]

@Mardi

So funny how you slam people, then say you don’t want to have the conversation again.

Yes, it is funny.

[TheMoo]

@Mardi

So funny how you slam people, then say you don’t want to have the conversation again.

No one likes being redundant.

[NotGrandPrixYet]

This is a genuine question: Can someone who has free attorney services that threatens to tie up your business in lawsuits be considered as having a position of power? Could frivolous lawsuits be considered a form of extortion or bullying? Not saying she did it, and not sure if it is relevant. But I am curious.

[ladyj79]

@NotGrandPrixYet

This is a genuine question: Can someone who has free attorney services that threatens to tie up your business in lawsuits be considered as having a position of power? Could frivolous lawsuits be considered a form of extortion or bullying? Not saying she did it, and not sure if it is relevant. But I am curious.

No, I do not believe that pursuing legal claims would comprise bullying by any institutional measure.

As lawsuits, frivolous or otherwise, are under the auspices of the courts, that would be where one would seek redress. Courts dismiss lawsuits all the time.

[soloudinhere]

@NotGrandPrixYet

This is a genuine question: Can someone who has free attorney services that threatens to tie up your business in lawsuits be considered as having a position of power? Could frivolous lawsuits be considered a form of extortion or bullying? Not saying she did it, and not sure if it is relevant. But I am curious.

That person’s attorney would be unwise to act on their behalf in frivolous litigation. To bring a frivolous action would be a violation of Rule 3.1, and lawyers have been disbarred for doing so. There’s a rule against it in the rules of civil procedure as well, and an attorney can be fined for doing so.

This is why truly frivolous litigation is almost always pro se.

Now, does that prevent someone from firing off a bunch of letters threatening litigation? no. But for someone to actually file actions that require a response, that would be a no-no.

Additionally, in several states, barratry is in and of itself a misdemeanor crime.

California Penal Code Section 159: “No person can be convicted of common barratry except upon proof that he has excited suits or proceedings at law in at least three instances, and with a corrupt or malicious intent to vex and annoy.”

[NotGrandPrixYet]

Thanks. Makes sense.

[eggbutt]

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: Just checking in after days away and find it hilarious that I was chastised for not keeping on topic, yet those same chastisers have veered off.

So much to say and so little time or care to say it. :yes::yes:

[Sdel]

@ladyj79

Remember when I suggested that a particular poster stop posting unfounded allegations anonymously and they did, and were immediately replaced by another low post member doing the same thing?

:rolleyes:

I assume you are referring to me? If you want to call me a “troll” at least have the balls to do it to my face. I may not have a huge post count because I mostly read…but my account is indeed several years old.

And if you are indeed done with the conversation, then I’ll feel free to ignore your continued whining since you can’t seem to figure out how to leave the conversations you claim that you are tired of.

[Sdel]

@soloudinhere

That person’s attorney would be unwise to act on their behalf in frivolous litigation. To bring a frivolous action would be a violation of Rule 3.1, and lawyers have been disbarred for doing so. There’s a rule against it in the rules of civil procedure as well, and an attorney can be fined for doing so.

This is why truly frivolous litigation is almost always pro se.

Now, does that prevent someone from firing off a bunch of letters threatening litigation? no. But for someone to actually file actions that require a response, that would be a no-no.

Additionally, in several states, barratry is in and of itself a misdemeanor crime.

California Penal Code Section 159: “No person can be convicted of common barratry except upon proof that he has excited suits or proceedings at law in at least three instances, and with a corrupt or malicious intent to vex and annoy.”

So, would it be any different, if it was just letters threatening legal action? At some point, shouldn’t that be considered bullying and harassment, especially when the person doing it has a history of such tactics?

[ladyj79]

@Sdel

I assume you are referring to me? If you want to call me a “troll” at least have the balls to do it to my face. I may not have a huge post count because I mostly read…but my account is indeed several years old.

And if you are indeed done with the conversation, then I’ll feel free to ignore your continued whining since you can’t seem to figure out how to leave the conversations you claim that you are tired of.

:lol:

I feel so put in my place