What is your source for this statistic?
I would replace these words with âbeat up/beat to death.â I think small women with a guns/poison/knives can easily murder or inflict serious damage on larger men. Size, I think, wouldnât be that much of an issue.
Just my thoughts.
What gender murders what gender is not what Iâm talking about, although you seem determined to steer it that way.
I simply said that being what one poster calls ânormalâ (and there really is no such thing â I would use the term ârationalâ) will not insulate a person from other peopleâs irrationality/drama. You insist on turning it into a black and white picture of LK and MB. In your view, one is completely innocent of irrational behavior and the otherâs irrational behavior is 100% inexcusable. Some of us donât see it that way.
Definitely several posters have made it very clear that they pity Michael Barisone, for shooting a woman twice in the chest and nearly killing her. People have been very upfront about this belief.
And then there are those of us that think shooting a woman twice in the chest is beyond the pale, unless she is actively trying to kill you.
I am going to say again, I personally believe it is wrong to shoot someone who is not actively trying to kill you.
It is 100% wrong to drive to anyoneâs house with a gun, particularly someone with whom you are having an ongoing dispute. There are legal venues to pursue. You donât just get to supersede those and shoot people, regardless of how annoying they are.
I know lots of people who pretty much always have a gun. So I personally do not find it weird that someone would drive to a house, any house, with a gun.
Disclaimer - I in no way think that shooting LK was the right answer here. That was totally wrong.
I have no problem with people who lawfully carry. We know that was not the case here, because there are additional weapons charges.
Either you just canât read for comprehension or you purposely have misread what others have said. Putting words in others mouths (i.e., lying about what someone else said) doesnât make your point valid.
No one has said that they âpity Michael Barisone, for shooting a woman twice in the chest and nearly killing her.âÂ
What they have said, is that they feel for him, because he was treated so horribly that he felt he had exhausted normal remedies (repeated calling cops who do nothing, for example) to the point that he believed no one was going to help him against LK, who is demonstrably a horrible person.
Please demonstrate from factual legal sources ie not opinion where Michael Barisone believed he had exhausted all legal remedies.
Please show from factual legal sources how Lauren is demonstrably, not subjectively, a âhorrible personâ.
Stating things as fact does not make your opinions fact.
Please tell me how this post is relevant regarding whether there is new information from the courts. Youâve repeated your opinion an nauseam. We get it. You and other love to lecture others for doing exactly what you are doing. You and Yankee Duchess seem obsessed as though you are involved or know the people involved. I donât get your fascination and obsession.
Your posts are completely off topic and should be reported.
See, I can throw your diatribe right back at you.
I am definitely obsessed with suggesting people not stalk women they dont like on the internets, spread wild accusations, and support men who shoot women in the womenâs front yard. Or anywhere.
I am super obsessed with repeating that shooting people who arenât actively trying to kill you is very wrong, and that those who blindly support men shooting women who they dont like have to listen to me tell them they are awful.
Ad nauseam. Or at least six times per day, per thread.
These threads really are a great example of poor reading comprehension and misinterpreting posts to fit your agenda.
#whack
Is there any new info or is this thread just for people to rehash what all of the other threads have been -i.e. âIâm not saying she deserved to get shotâŠâ If thatâs all it is, the mods need to shut this down again. The bickering is obnoxious.
Sorry to say the obvious, but you can always not read the thread if you do not like it.
Kind of like I do not like all the name calling and bickering in the political threads so I do not go read those - instead of insisting the mods shut them down.
I personally have learned all kinds of things in these threads.
See, the bolded right there. Most of us arenât saying it was okay to shoot her. We are saying that considering the outrageously out of control and extreme behavior coming from LK (I mean, if MB and the whole barn were bullying herâŠwhy were they the ones in the barn?) we are keeping the possibility that MB did believe he was shooting LK in self defense, or that there was some sort of accidental shooting because of a physical altercation over the gun, open in our minds until the trial.
MB driving over to her house with the gun doesnât necessarily mean he meant to shoot her. It doesnât prevent LK from approaching him (which she said she did) and being extremely threatening while doing it. You are not required to allow someone to physically reach you and start attacking you before you are allowed to shoot in self defense. No state requires that.
And again, as someone who has lived itâŠif LKâs behavior was truly reportedâŠit was not merely âannoyingâ. Obviously you donât sleep in front of your horses stall with a loaded weapon unless there was a credible threat of harm to come to the horse.
From listening to the 911 calls, it looked to me that he was using the 911 service to harass and intimidate LK. Remember the one in which he makes a 911 can because his clients refuse to sign a document? Declining to sign a document is neither a crime nor an emergency.
On another, he says he feels threatened because she had posted something on Facebook the previous day. The dispatcher is confused, and asks, well, is anything happening now?
Even if he didnât drive over there intending to shoot her, having a gun with you to try to intimidate someone is unlawful use of a firearm, and one of the charges against him.
Only an irresponsible, irrational person sleeps outside her horseâs stall with a loaded gun under her pillow. Only one side was armed in this tragedy, and it wasnât LK.
A lot of people donât know how to use 911 appropriately. They just think they need the police so they call 911 instead of the non-emergency number. Heck, youâve even maintained that LKâs father didnât know how to use 911 appropriately when he called 911 looking for information on the shooting.
Ah, so is it putting words in someoneâs mouth to say that now the fan girls maintain he doesnât know how to use 911, but has exhausted all legal measures to gain redress from unspecified and unproven but repeatedly claimed âcrimesâ???
:lol::lol::lol:
To respond to your post and stay on topic, there is no relevant new news on either case. There was a short process hearing last week that resulted in nothing to report.
Iâm positive there is much to be said, but I can guarantee it wonât be said here.
Does the goalpost ever not move for those intent on defending violent men??