Michael Barisone

[gailbyrd]

@YankeeDuchess

From listening to the 911 calls, it looked to me that he was using the 911 service to harass and intimidate LK. Remember the one in which he makes a 911 can because his clients refuse to sign a document? Declining to sign a document is neither a crime nor an emergency.

On another, he says he feels threatened because she had posted something on Facebook the previous day. The dispatcher is confused, and asks, well, is anything happening now?

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, 911 wasn’t called because she refused to sign the paperwork. 911 was called because they refused to leave the barn area and were making threats. THAT’S what the 911 call was about. The threats. The paperwork was mentioned because that’s what lead to the threats made by LK and RG

[Graymaresrule]

@YankeeDuchess

Even if he didn’t drive over there intending to shoot her, having a gun with you yo try to intimidate someone is unlawful use of a firearm, and one of the charges against him.

Only an irresponsible, irrational person sleeps outside her horse’s stall with a loaded gun under her pillow. Only one side was armed in this tragedy, and it wasn’t LK.

How do you know she was unarmed? Hasn’t she been known to use a firearm in anger?

[tryintogethere]

@ladyj79

Please demonstrate from factual legal sources ie not opinion where Michael Barisone believed he had exhausted all legal remedies.

Please show from factual legal sources how Lauren is demonstrably, not subjectively, a “horrible person”.

Stating things as fact does not make your opinions fact.

The same thing can be said to you!
You have very clearly stated you opinion, for which you believe is fact, and because others don’t take what you say as gospel, you just keep trying to cram it down everyone’s throat!
The “factual legal sources” that you so desperately crave are not public yet, that will come with the trial, so you will just have to patiently wait, or not, who cares, your opinion means nothing!!

[Sdel]

@ladyj79

Ah, so is it putting words in someone’s mouth to say that now the fan girls maintain he doesn’t know how to use 911, but has exhausted all legal measures to gain redress from unspecified and unproven but repeatedly claimed “crimes”???

:lol::lol::lol:

Case in point of you putting words in other peoples mouths. You’ve just conflated two separate posters arguments. My thoughts, opinions, and arguments do not automatically transfer to anyone else’s thoughts, opinions and arguments.

[ladyj79]

@Sdel

Case in point of you putting words in other peoples mouths. You’ve just conflated two separate posters arguments. My thoughts, opinions, and arguments do not automatically transfer to anyone else’s thoughts, opinions and arguments.

But have I? :lol::lol::lol:

[trubandloki]

@ladyj79

But have I? :lol::lol::lol:

My honest opinion is actually yes. But…

Both sides do it.
You are not exempt even if you want to say you are.

[soloudinhere]

@Sdel

That was a thought about the whole case…not letters.

But the question I was answering was about harassment specifically via legal means/ threatening of legal action. You are responding to a different question entirely. Whether letters are a part of a pattern of behavior is also another issue.

Harassment is more than simply being annoyed by someone’s actions, words, signs, home decor, etc. In my state, harassment is “a knowing pattern of conduct or series of acts over a period of time directed at a specific person, which seriously alarms that person and would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress.”

The correct response to a harassing action is to obtain a civil order of protection against the harasser.

[ladyj79]

@trubandloki

My honest opinion is actually yes. But…

Both sides do it.
You are not exempt even if you want to say you are.

Sorry. I was making a joke about the new rush of posters who only really comment on these threads not being different people at all.

I mean, kind of a joke.

Honestly, I find these people below contempt. I’m ok with anything they want to say to or about me, since we are talking about people who stalk a rando chick and defend the man who shot her. Beneath contempt.

[ladyj79]

@soloudinhere

But the question I was answering was about harassment specifically via legal means/ threatening of legal action. You are responding to a different question entirely. Whether letters are a part of a pattern of behavior is also another issue.

Harassment is more than simply being annoyed by someone’s actions, words, signs, home decor, etc. In my state, harassment is “a knowing pattern of conduct or series of acts over a period of time directed at a specific person, which seriously alarms that person and would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress.”

The correct response to a harassing action is to obtain a civil order of protection against the harasser.

And harassment has a legal definition, and is classified as such by law enforcement and the courts, it isnt just how you feel about someone’s treatment of you or others.

As I said, these people keep throwing around criminal accusations, anonymously, which is against coth’s current posting policies.

They still remain beneath contempt though.

[eggbutt]

@ladyj79

Sorry. I was making a joke about the new rush of posters who only really comment on these threads not being different people at all.

I mean, kind of a joke.

Honestly, I find these people below contempt. I’m ok with anything they want to say to or about me, since we are talking about people who stalk a rando chick and defend the man who shot her. Beneath contempt.

And yet, here you are.

[ladyj79]

@eggbutt

And yet, here you are.

I told you, I’m just here to tell people stalking and slagging a rando nobody online while excusing the man who shot her twice in the chest that they are beneath contempt, and that I will try to limit myself to six iterations per day, per thread :lol:

[merrygoround]

@ladyj79

I told you, I’m just here to tell people stalking and slagging a rando nobody online while excusing the man who shot her twice in the chest that they are beneath contempt, and that I will try to limit myself to six iterations per day, per thread :lol:

My dear! Stay off teeter-totters, you are sounding terribly unbalanced.

I think it is time for me to depart! and the mods to join the party.

[Sdel]

@soloudinhere

Harassment is more than simply being annoyed by someone’s actions, words, signs, home decor, etc. In my state, harassment is “a knowing pattern of conduct or series of acts over a period of time directed at a specific person, which seriously alarms that person and would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress.”

The correct response to a harassing action is to obtain a civil order of protection against the harasser.

Well, the behaviors attributed to LK certainly meet that definition. And since MB was apparently talking to an attorney about the situation…he was attempting to work through the process of protection/eviction as well.

[YankeeDuchess]

@Sdel

A lot of people don’t know how to use 911 appropriately. They just think they need the police so they call 911 instead of the non-emergency number. Heck, you’ve even maintained that LK’s father didn’t know how to use 911 appropriately when he called 911 looking for information on the shooting.

Misrepresentation of what I said. I said he knowingly called 911 and explained that it was not an emergency but that he was seeking information and had already tried the non emergency number but just gotten a phone tree about stray dogs, etc., so was asking for 911 to give him the correct number for information, which they gave him. It’s obvious if you listen to the call.

I never said he did not know how to use 911 appropriately.

[YankeeDuchess]

@Sdel

A lot of people don’t know how to use 911 appropriately. They just think they need the police so they call 911 instead of the non-emergency number. Heck, you’ve even maintained that LK’s father didn’t know how to use 911 appropriately when he called 911 looking for information on the shooting.

It is not appropriate to call the police, emergency or non emergency, in response to your clients declining to sign a document.

[YankeeDuchess]

@gailbyrd

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, 911 wasn’t called because she refused to sign the paperwork. 911 was called because they refused to leave the barn area and were making threats. THAT’S what the 911 call was about. The threats. The paperwork was mentioned because that’s what lead to the threats made by LK and RG

You can say it as many times as you like. I’m going by the recording of that 911 call. Barisone states that the reason for the call is that his clients refuse to sign documents. He never says that he asked them to leave and they refused.

[YankeeDuchess]

@Graymaresrule

How do you know she was unarmed? Hasn’t she been known to use a firearm in anger?

She has said that she owns guns but left them
in NC. The news reports and information from court hearings indicated that there was only one gun on the scene - Barisone’s.

[JustTheTicket]

@trubandloki

Sorry to say the obvious, but you can always not read the thread if you do not like it.
Kind of like I do not like all the name calling and bickering in the political threads so I do not go read those - instead of insisting the mods shut them down.

I personally have learned all kinds of things in these threads.

Wow. So helpful, thank you. I came here because I’m interested in the case and I (wrongly) assumed that the thread had been left open because there were new developments. I didn’t realize this was going to be more of the other threads, which is a bunch of people arguing like they were there or something. I’ll leave y’all to your fighting, then.

[YankeeDuchess]

@JustTheTicket

Wow. So helpful, thank you. I came here because I’m interested in the case and I (wrongly) assumed that the thread had been left open because there were new developments. I didn’t realize this was going to be more of the other threads, which is a bunch of people arguing like they were there or something. I’ll leave y’all to your fighting, then.

Threads are left open unless the moderator closes them.

Someone made the typical accusation that LK would routinely chime in to “make it about her” and keep the thread going.

She has not made a single post in this thread; there are no new developments in either case, but the thread dribbles on with all the tired criticisms of LK.

[eggbutt]

@YankeeDuchess

Threads are left open unless the moderator closes them.

Someone made the typical accusation that LK would routinely chime in to “make it about her” and keep the thread going.

She has not made a single post in this thread; there are no new developments in either case, but the thread dribbles on with all the tired criticisms of LK.

Yet, YOU continue to post. Why is that?