[QUOTE=Laurierace;7888949]
Not a lawyer so this might be a dumb question but why a supeoba and not a warrant for removing the animals?[/QUOTE]
I don’t have a law degree, so take this with a grain of salt but as far as I was taught and understood…
A subpoena is a document that demands a person must present any and all requested items to authorities that pertain to an ongoing criminal or civil investigation or that they must present themselves in court alongside said items. In this case, the items would be the horses.
A warrant is can be one of three types but generally is issued when a person is charged with a crime. As far as I can tell from the news articles, she was not charged with abuse until after the animals were seized. I would assume that the authorities subpoenaed her to procure the horses as part of an ongoing legal investigation and then once the horses were seized as evidence, the evidence then provided the basis for the warrant.
Again, don’t take my word on it and don’t bust my chops if it’s slightly off in terms of definition.
I’ve been following this case and this post as I’m originally from around that area of NJ and this whole is sickening. The state of the horses, the pictures of her with the horses, and the secondhand stories of her personality and former activities. I hope the horses find peace, whether through rehab or euthanasia, and that she receives any needed psychiatric help and is banned from owning horses or any animals again. But the law rarely institutes that as a sentence… unfortunately…