New decision in Holstein

[QUOTE=NoDQhere;8082749]
I don’t want to be disrespectful to any breed as there are good and bad in all of them. But I am one US breeder who did try to make Sport Horses using TBs, 30 years ago. My thing was Eventing and I was sure the TBs were the way to go. My experiences were not good. That is how my family came to buy the stallion Meisterwind. And once I sat on that horse there was no going back for me. My family was never independently wealthy so we had to breed horses that people would buy.[/QUOTE]

Smart , very smart of you to recognize what was not working for you and to make a change.

You kind of said more calmly what I have been trying to relay the entire time. Why breed horses the vast majority of customers don’t want ? This is a bad business model.

[QUOTE=andy.smaga;8082803]
Hyperion gave a good analysis of the horses able to clear 1.60 courses with consistency (you can understand why some people really like a certain type of horse while others really do not like that type of horse) here is part of his post :
“The sport of show jumping for example requires horses of speed, tenacity and scope. The horses who are winning, win for several reasons. They win because they have have the scope for 1.60m over courses that demand stamina and power i.e… World Championship level. They win because they are quick in technique, don’t over jump and turn fast while hanging onto the momentum… These horses win the indoors and classes built for this type of technique. Overall we need horses who fit in to three categories in show jumping; Fast and furious, powerful and methodical and a combination of both.”[/QUOTE]

Hi Andy ! Long time no hear.

I also agree with Hyperion Stud. She knows what she is talking about as she had the 12th placed Imothep at the WEG and Chin Quidam , the most successful 8 yr old in the world last year.

Here ya go:

[QUOTE=zipperfoot;8082999]
Here ya go:[/QUOTE]

Oh , so me referring to a certain sect as TB Jihadists… is to you calling someone names ? I would never consider the same if you referred to me as a WB Jihadists. I would absolutely laugh at it’s intended comedy.

Wow ! we are truely living in the land of the offended.

I also don’t want to be disrespectful of any breed, but I am very interested in what the breeders and the riders of top horses say. I’ve also been in this sport for MANY years. I bred my first in ~1978, a good TB mare to one of those “new” (to the US) warmbloods - recognizing what I felt was their superiority for dressage and jumping. I have only bred 7 so I do NOT consider myself a breeder; but as a now dressage rider but former jumper rider, I am really not interested in TB any closer than 2-3 generations. I also have a Ph.D in genetics which does not make me an expert in equine genetics, but it makes me very interested in the question of whether warmbloods need the infusion of more “blood” or not. And, if so, WHY?
The modern warmblood is a very different creature then it was 30 years ago, (and the TB may be as well), so what is the reason we need to continue to add blood? I personally don’t see what it adds to the modern warmblood. If we are losing the TB traits, it really can only be because of selection against those traits. Without human selection, we aren’t going to lose those TB genes.

[QUOTE=Bayhawk;8083016]
Oh , so me referring to a certain sect as TB Jihadists… is to you calling someone names ? I would never consider the same if you referred to me as a WB Jihadists. I would absolutely laugh at it’s intended comedy.

Wow ! we are truely living in the land of the offended.[/QUOTE]

It’s not just the jihadist comment. There are quite a few folks who’ve posted some very lengthy and informative posts which discuss the pros and cons of TB’s. All this without resorting to rudeness such as you’ve directed at several people in this thread when they’ve posted something you disagree with.

This isn’t about living in the land of the offended. This is about having productive discussions in a civil manner. Supershort and PNW seem to get it.


[QUOTE=Bayhawk;8083016]
Oh , so me referring to a certain sect as TB Jihadists… is to you calling someone names ? I would never consider the same if you referred to me as a WB Jihadists. I would absolutely laugh at it’s intended comedy.

Wow ! we are truely living in the land of the offended.[/QUOTE]

It’s not just the jihadist comment. There are quite a few folks who’ve posted some very lengthy and informative posts which discuss the pros and cons of TB’s. All this without resorting to rudeness such as you’ve directed at several people in this thread when they’ve posted something you disagree with.

This isn’t about living in the land of the offended. This is about having productive discussions in a civil manner. Supershort and PNW seem to get it.


[QUOTE=SnicklefritzG;8083284]
It’s not just the jihadist comment. There are quite a few folks who’ve posted some very lengthy and informative posts which discuss the pros and cons of TB’s. All this without resorting to rudeness such as you’ve directed at several people in this thread when they’ve posted something you disagree with.

This isn’t about living in the land of the offended. This is about having productive discussions in a civil manner. Supershort and PNW seem to get it.

----------[/QUOTE]

We are having very productive discussions amongst the folks who know what they are talking about or between those curious to learn.

If I have a rude tone with a couple posters here it’s because they’ve earned it.

Now stop trying to be the tone police and quit attempting to brow beat me.

Again ,for the 3rd time…if you don’t like what I have to say or how I say it…don’t read it or respond to it…it’s that simple.

I wrote that in response to this message:
I don’t want to be disrespectful to any breed as there are good and bad in all of them. But I am one US breeder who did try to make Sport Horses using TBs, 30 years ago. My thing was Eventing and I was sure the TBs were the way to go. My experiences were not good. That is how my family came to buy the stallion Meisterwind. And once I sat on that horse there was no going back for me. My family was never independently wealthy so we had to breed horses that people would buy.

In Holland there are people that say that the good dressage and show jumping ability of many Dutch horses actually come from the Gelderlander horse.

[QUOTE=andy.smaga;8082803]
Hyperion gave a good analysis of the horses able to clear 1.60 courses with consistency (you can understand why some people really like a certain type of horse while others really do not like that type of horse) here is part of his post :
“The sport of show jumping for example requires horses of speed, tenacity and scope. The horses who are winning, win for several reasons. They win because they have have the scope for 1.60m over courses that demand stamina and power i.e… World Championship level. They win because they are quick in technique, don’t over jump and turn fast while hanging onto the momentum… These horses win the indoors and classes built for this type of technique. Overall we need horses who fit in to three categories in show jumping; Fast and furious, powerful and methodical and a combination of both.”[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Elles;8082743]
In Holland quite a lot of people seem to be sad that the past is the past. They are thinking that the Gelderlander horse of the past, before a lot of TB stallions were used in Holland, was the best horse one can think of but now these horses are almost gone. Also a lot of people think it is a good thing that the horses of the past have been modernized.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJ4NzeLaUorXVb-D1Qx0rsQ/feed
Zep had this mare in his pedigree: http://www.horsetelex.nl/horses/pedigree/12193
Still people dream of times gone by when they look at his videos.[/QUOTE]

I think that their might be other motivations behind that. Although I register all my foals with KWPN, and a gret admiror of the whole dutch ways of doing in breeding, I don’t know that much about Gelderlander. But I think in that case, it is more of a cultural or patrimonial thing to protect the traditional Gelderlander. I admire that. Myself I was a student worker at a studfarm in Ireland where they did a lot to breed and preserve the Irish Draught horse. They also bred warmbloods who jumped up to the biggest GP, but they felt it was very important to preserve the traditional Irish Draught horse. I think it is very important that those breed be preserved. If I had more financial mean, I for sure would buy a couple of good ID broodmares. I totaly felt in love with the breed but I wouldn’t expect to breed pure ID for the GP ring. They are no longer suited for the modern sport in my mind. However, their may still be some line outthere that could prouve usefull into a sport horse program.

In my younger years :slight_smile: there were still quite a lot of Gelderlander horses left, also pure ones. And people were breeding most of these mares to Thoroughbreds.
http://www.gelderlanderhorse.nl/english/introduction.htm
I think they have been more important within dressage breeding than show jumping breeding.

I bought this mare when she was a foal: http://www.allbreedpedigree.com/jolijt2
The breeder had a few pure Gelderlander mares and these she bred to blood horses.

[QUOTE=Bayhawk;8083399]
We are having very productive discussions amongst the folks who know what they are talking about or between those curious to learn.

If I have a rude tone with a couple posters here it’s because they’ve earned it.

Now stop trying to be the tone police and quit attempting to brow beat me.

Again ,for the 3rd time…if you don’t like what I have to say or how I say it…don’t read it or respond to it…it’s that simple.[/QUOTE]

I’ve read the posts and the people you’ve attacked haven’t been rude in their posts. They’ve just happened to hold different opinions.

If you don’t like what people have to say you can choose not to respond. I think COTH is a very useful forum for sharing info, more so when people can play nice. That doesn’t mean not expressing different opinions, that means discussing things in a civil manner.

Just a fyi because it came up:

Hirtentanz’s highest show record (FN records) is at S*, which is 1,35m to 1,45m as per FN rules. He has won at that level several times.
And grayarabpony, he is not “generations of dressage horses”. Very far from it. Just because his sire competes at GP Dressage doesn’t mean that is what his athletic ability is. He had the highest jumping score of his approvals and there are a lot of very knowledgeable people out there that would have guaranteed that stallion a high end jumper career if he had been sent down that path. His owners had different plans, and he is doing very well in dressage, but that really just is a testament ot his versatility as a sport horse. Axis’s dam sire is a close relative to TSF Karascada’s dam sire - multiple 4star mare, ran Badminton 3 times during her career with no jump faults xc.
The Hirtentanz - Axis - Sixtus stallion line, tracing back to Habicht and Burnus AAH, is the most versatile of the entire Trak breed and Habicht alone has produced international horses (Championship horses) for show jumping (e.g. Anne Kursinki’s Livius), eventing and dressage.
Hirtentanz’ dam line is known for dressage, but just as much for upper level eventing at the 3star level.
Saying all that though - Hirtentanz is about as far away from a TB as he can be in terms of quickness and if quickness is your goal, he is no substitute. His qualities lie elsewhere.

Carry on.

Bayhawk has been contradicting his own statements so many times just to be able to contradict what others say that what he says is no longer of value to me.

[QUOTE=SnicklefritzG;8083559]
I’ve read the posts and the people you’ve attacked haven’t been rude in their posts. They’ve just happened to hold different opinions.

If you don’t like what people have to say you can choose not to respond. I think COTH is a very useful forum for sharing info, more so when people can play nice. That doesn’t mean not expressing different opinions, that means discussing things in a civil manner.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=SnicklefritzG;8083559]
I’ve read the posts and the people you’ve attacked haven’t been rude in their posts. They’ve just happened to hold different opinions.

If you don’t like what people have to say you can choose not to respond. I think COTH is a very useful forum for sharing info, more so when people can play nice. That doesn’t mean not expressing different opinions, that means discussing things in a civil manner.[/QUOTE]

Do you not get it ? I don’t care what your opinion is on HOW the conversation is carried out. I just simply don’t care. You must care greatly ,as you continue to engage me. Please stop.

[QUOTE=Elles;8083622]
Bayhawk has been contradicting his own statements so many times just to be able to contradict what others say that what he says is no longer of value to me.[/QUOTE]

Elles darling…my posts no longer have value to you because you just can’t bring yourself to believe what myself and others keep telling you.

And there are no contradictions in what I say…it’s the same every time.

[QUOTE=Maren;8083605]
Just a fyi because it came up:

Hirtentanz’s highest show record (FN records) is at S*, which is 1,35m to 1,45m as per FN rules. He has won at that level several times.
And grayarabpony, he is not “generations of dressage horses”. Very far from it. Just because his sire competes at GP Dressage doesn’t mean that is what his athletic ability is. He had the highest jumping score of his approvals and there are a lot of very knowledgeable people out there that would have guaranteed that stallion a high end jumper career if he had been sent down that path. His owners had different plans, and he is doing very well in dressage, but that really just is a testament ot his versatility as a sport horse. Axis’s dam sire is a close relative to TSF Karascada’s dam sire - multiple 4star mare, ran Badminton 3 times during her career with no jump faults xc.
The Hirtentanz - Axis - Sixtus stallion line, tracing back to Habicht and Burnus AAH, is the most versatile of the entire Trak breed and Habicht alone has produced international horses (Championship horses) for show jumping (e.g. Anne Kursinki’s Livius), eventing and dressage.
Hirtentanz’ dam line is known for dressage, but just as much for upper level eventing at the 3star level.
Saying all that though - Hirtentanz is about as far away from a TB as he can be in terms of quickness and if quickness is your goal, he is no substitute. His qualities lie elsewhere.

Carry on.[/QUOTE]

Thank you Maren! I was using him as an example and he is a horse I have long admired. Experience has taught me that you are far better breeding horses from families that have done what you wish to do with the resulting foal.

Do TBs have the right type of quickness? My experience tells me no. Their quickness tends to be “across the ground” quickness which translates to loss of rhythm, running themselves over their shoulders and onto the forehand, not much help for jumping. Hence my thoughts that if you felt you needed “blood” a horse like Hirtentanz was a better bet. He is very good in the front end and (again, my opinion from my experiences) his steady rhythm and adjustability looks like it is very easy for him to get to the right distance for a beautiful jump.

If we do use him on our Meisterwind X Hansel (female line of Abiza) it would be with the hope of an Eventer. But if we got a horse capable of jumping the big jumps, we wouldn’t be disappointed. The fact that the foal would have dressage movement is almost guaranteed.

I think we can conclude one thing from what a lot of people are saying here:
the people of the Holsteiner Verband must be completely out of their minds because there is already enough TB blood in the horse population and TB blood would be detrimental to show jumping ability anyway. As there is already enough blood in the Holsteiner population, TB is also not useful in the F2 or F3 generations. So TB is also not to be used now for the breed two or three generations further from now.

[QUOTE=Elles;8083756]
I think we can conclude one thing from what a lot of people are saying here:
the people of the Holsteiner Verband must be completely out of their minds because there is already enough TB blood in the horse population and TB blood would be detrimental to show jumping ability anyway. As there is already enough blood in the Holsteiner population, TB is also not useful in the F2 or F3 generations. So TB is also not to be used now for the breed two or three generations further from now.[/QUOTE]

No…once gain ,you just can’t seem to comprehend the intent.

The breeding director of the Holsteiner Verband WANTS the breeders to use more Tb’s as he is trying to look in to the future. That’s why they just relaxed the rules and told the breeders that they can use any TB stallion as long as another major registry has approved it. Problem is…the breeding director of the Holsteiner Verband doesn’t pay the bills of the breeders and it is the breeders who are aware of what the market wants today.

The problem is that most breeders don’t want to use a TB Stallion as they feel they don’t need him at this time.

What they do want , is to take advantage of the new rule that they can use stallions that have 3 placings at 1.60 meter and approved by another major registry.

This should tell you that the breeders want performance right now and they don’t feel they need a TB stallion for anything right now.

[QUOTE=Elles;8083756]
I think we can conclude one thing from what a lot of people are saying here:
the people of the Holsteiner Verband must be completely out of their minds because there is already enough TB blood in the horse population and TB blood would be detrimental to show jumping ability anyway. As there is already enough blood in the Holsteiner population, TB is also not useful in the F2 or F3 generations. So TB is also not to be used now for the breed two or three generations further from now.[/QUOTE]

You clearly have not understood the argument. Some are of that opinion, some other are not. But the whole discussion was far wider than that single point. I, and many other, have repeated it at least 10 times over that post but I will try to do it again. The question is a complex one, and not simply one of pro TB or TB haters.

Everyone agrees on the impact the TB had over the years on sport horses breeding in general.

Another question is as to what TB brought to sport horse breeding. This is where the whole “TB kills the jump” comes into play. I, as many other, am of the opinion that TB have brought stamina, blood and everything generaly associated with blood in a horse. These attributes were good and needed. on the other side, I am of the opinion that although TB improved some aspects, their first products have some parts missing, including generaly the jump, hence “They kill the jump”. Does that mean they are not good for breeding? NO, they are not just not good for one aspect. But mares from TB sires, although not necessarly great sport horses in themselves, can bring other attributes to the equation, if bred back to stallions that can bring back the jump.

This being said, another aspect of the discussion was as to wether, with the actual state of the sporthorse, we still need influx of new TB blood or if all the attributes generally attributed to a TB in breeding can be found within the sporthorse population, without the downturns associated with breeding to a TB. On that point, people diverge in opinions.

Finally, another question which, in my mind has nothing to do with breeding, is does the TB or TB F1 crosses are well suited to todays sport, or if they can no longer compete with today’s purpously bred WB. It is in connection with that point that people discussed about the evolution of the TB and the WB as well as the evolution of the sport and the SJ courses. Keep in mind that a good sport horse and a good stallion is not necessarly the same. A good TB stallion that could jump bigger classes is not necessarly a stallion that have attributes required for WB breeding to transfer to its progeny. On the other side, a TB stallion that is not a great performer could have some attribute, other than jump, that could be beneficial to the WB in general.

This is a very short summary as hundred of pages would be necessary to argue on all these topics.