New filing on ecourts re MB

[eggbutt]

@Inigo-montoya

And as I’ve asked this group many times…if Tarshis believed LK was a squatter, grifter, menace why would he be trying to place her with another high profile barn and trainer?

This is the reason and it doesn’t matter what the people here say. They have zero interest in the truth. He told other barns just what he has told me many times. MHG is POISON! The young working students had to leave because of her. She couldn’t stop thinking Barisone might flirt with 20 year old girls. But for MHG, this shooting never happens!

Now that’s what Tarshis told me. And other than the part about the shooting which hadn’t happened yet, that is what he was telling other barn owners.

OMG!!! Who cares what you have to say?? Do you really stop and think about what you are saying before you speak? Do you believe making accusations about Tarshis now makes any difference in the public’s perception of your daughter and your family? That horse left the barn a long, long time ago. Your posts reek of desperation.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@SillyHorse

@Inigo-montoya

The prosecutor didn’t want to use the recordings because his case was airtight

This is about as ridiculous a statement as I’ve ever read. LOLOL!

Even lowly vacuumers knew the case was a bust.

Do I need to explain the NGRI verdict to you? Again?

The prosecutor met his burden of proof with respect to the charges pertaining to LK. Bilinkas met his burden in establishing that MB was insane when he shot LK.

[cutter99]

@Inigo-montoya

Please tell me you’re a law librarian and have never really practiced law. You know where to find the law but nothing about the law. There are some thoughtful attorneys on this page but you’re not one.

What attorney worth her salt takes the pleadings of one side in a lawsuit as gospel and ignores the other?
You insisted RC and SGF had close to nil liability! Truly clueless?
Now you take the certification of MB’s attorney and closest friend as gospel. Do you give a damn about facts??
Steven Tarshis is a liar. He perjured himself over and over at the criminal trial. For along time, I believed he hadn’t committed perjury but merely had forgotten important facts in the 3 years between the shooting and the trial. But I was wrong. He lied. He said he was negotiating for weeks with me about finding LK a new barn. NO! Lie! I was out of the country and spoke to him for the first time ever on Friday, August 2.
He said he was recorded. LIE!
He and I had many many cordial conversations between the shooting and when we met him at Wellington.
We talked golf as well as mutual friends we had in NJ. He spoke about a possible movie about this whole matter. He spoke about who sho play him in the movie.
When we saw him at Adequan he could not have been happier to “finally meet us in person.” Those were his words! Do you think he had to spend 45 minutes talking about the case with JK, LK, and KK if he didn’t want to.
And, the next day he texted me…“nice to meet you, I spoke to Bilinkas about our conversation. How long are you going to be in Florida?” Yeah, I have all our texts to one other.
His certification is a lie. But you, Ekat, now as always, missed that day in law school where lawyers learn there are two sides to a lawsuit. And you also apparently missed the day where lawyers are taught that pleadings are just that…pleadings.

So in answer to your typical wiseass (but always clueless) question…NO…I did not tell him about all of that at this event…because our conversation that evening could not have been more pleasant…does that satisfy your curiosity?

This coming from the brilliant criminal attorney of great reputation Jonathan Kanarek, a.k.a @Inigo-montoya???

Who never actually practiced law, correct???

Uh huh, well there’s that!!!

[Inigo-montoya]

Oh, you know how to answer a subpoena? Lawyers who actually completed law school take a subpoena, or any legal document they receive, to a competent lawyer for advice. That’s what I did and the judge agreed with our position. Were you absent that day too? You must be a helluva advocate for your clients if you ever had any. Well, Mr Client, you got a subpoena so just give them whatever they ask for. Keep giving that kind of advice to these people on Coth. They actually are deserving of your poor counsel.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@SillyHorse

@Inigo-montoya

The prosecutor didn’t want to use the recordings because his case was airtight

This is about as ridiculous a statement as I’ve ever read. LOLOL!

Even lowly vacuumers knew the case was a bust.

Do I need to explain the NGRI verdict to you? Again?

The prosecutor met his burden of proof with respect to the charges pertaining to LK. Bilinkas met his burden in establishing that MB was insane when he shot LK.

Buh bye

[MHM]

@Inigo-montoya

He spoke about a possible movie about this whole matter. He spoke about who sho play him in the movie.

Pfft.

I wonder if he agreed with our BB opinions on the casting decisions.

[Maria]

Most people address the subpoena with a Motion to Quash before the deadline of the subpoena

[Inigo-montoya]

You don’t need to have practiced law to outsmart EKAT. A jeopardy contestant knows how to apply the law better than she does. She’s great at finding the law. Kudos! But understanding the law…NOPE!

[Knights_Mom]

@Maria

Most people address the subpoena with a Motion to Quash before the deadline of the subpoena

Especially when they want everyone to know of all the plots. Because bombshells.

[ekat]

@Inigo-montoya

Well, Mr Client, you got a subpoena so just give them whatever they ask for.

Yeah, answering a subpoena doesn’t mean what you just said.

It does mean not waiting until the requesting party has filed a motion for contempt (twice) to handle it though.

[SoCoPony]

Me thinks someone had Daddios on the Patio password again this evening…

These posts just scream “I NEED ATTENTION” “LOOK AT ME, LOOK AT ME”

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@SillyHorse

@Inigo-montoya

The prosecutor didn’t want to use the recordings because his case was airtight

This is about as ridiculous a statement as I’ve ever read. LOLOL!

Even lowly vacuumers knew the case was a bust.

Do I need to explain the NGRI verdict to you? Again?

The prosecutor met his burden of proof with respect to the charges pertaining to LK. Bilinkas met his burden in establishing that MB was insane when he shot LK.

Buh bye

$10. $5 per word.

Expensive.

[SillyHorse]

This is ridiculous. IM deserves as much in the way of responses as do CH and HH. If people stop responding to his (her?) absurd and pathetic posts, maybe he’ll (she’ll?) go away.

[Knights_Mom]

@Inigo-montoya

You don’t need to have practiced law to outsmart EKAT. A jeopardy contestant knows how to apply the law better than she does. She’s great at finding the law. Kudos! But understanding the law…NOPE!

You keep saying stuff about legal professionals who were right when you were repeatedly wrong.

I think that’s funny.

Maybe you’re the ship’s comedian on those cruises?

[Sdel]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I think most people understand that pleadings are just pleadings and not facts, but some choose to pretend that the pleadings of Barisone’s lawyers are facts.

Pleadings are usually based on facts and evidence, silly, because eventually you have prove your claims with facts and evidence. There has been enough evidence released to validate that Silver and Deininger’s pleadings are very fact based……compared to other pleadings in the civil suit based on lies, denial, improper court procedure, and desperate begging not to embarrass the plaintiff.

[jaj]

I actually think that this might be JK. What a pathetic, miserable family. Slime oozes off these posts.

[Virginia_Horse_Mom]

@SoCoPony

Me thinks someone had Daddios on the Patio password again this evening…

These posts just scream “I NEED ATTENTION” “LOOK AT ME, LOOK AT ME”

I wonder.

I think losing in such a spectacular public fashion is very hard for Lollypop and family.

[Inigo-montoya]

And again, the motions for contempt were denied immediately by the judge. So, as usual, you only care that one side made a motion and don’t understand the judge disagreed with the motions. Seriously, this is 1L stuff. What is wrong with you?
Are you really trying to tell me in front of all these people that a party with a contra interest made a motion to hold me in contempt which was denied so therefore I was wrong??
Again 1L stuff!

[Knights_Mom]

@Inigo-montoya

And again, the motions for contempt were denied immediately by the judge. So, as usual, you only care that one side made a motion and don’t understand the judge disagreed with the motions. Seriously, this is 1L stuff. What is wrong with you?
Are you really trying to tell me in front of all these people that a party with a contra interest made a motion to hold me in contempt which was denied so therefore I was wrong??
Again 1L stuff!

[ekat]

@Inigo-montoya

And again, the motions for contempt were denied immediately by the judge. So, as usual, you only care that one side made a motion and don’t understand the judge disagreed with the motions. Seriously, this is 1L stuff. What is wrong with you?
Are you really trying to tell me in front of all these people that a party with a contra interest made a motion to hold me in contempt which was denied so therefore I was wrong??
Again 1L stuff

You do realize we all can read the court docket, right?