When the insurance company denied him representation the criminal trial had not happened yet. So, it would not be re-litigating that since the decision was made before that happened.
16 Likes
Too easy to cheat and certain posters clearly have honed that skill for decades.
4 Likes
Not true. The insurance company lawsuit involves, yet again, different parties and different questions from either the criminal trial or the lawsuit involving SGF and RC.
I bet they would be eager to rehash the trial. But maybe theyāll just opt to settle.
13 Likes
If, in fact, Tarshis ever actually said anything negative about MHG.
Do we have any evidence of that? Or just IM/JKās word?
16 Likes
Can you claim you missed something if you never looked?
12 Likes
I can totally imagine being on the fence about that one.
On the one hand, I would think it would be very satisfying to take immediate legal action.
On the other hand, it might be such a relief to finally, finally, finally have these people in the rearview mirror legally, without dragging it out for so much as one more single second.
12 Likes
I would never trust IMs word as gospel on anything.
I suspect gross exaggerations are the norm - at the very least.
Imagine being with friends, hanging out, having a few drinks, maybe a cigar at the golf club, just shooting the breeze making small meaningless comments about a few folks in the area. Now imagine years later having to rehash before a court and in public, someoneās gross exaggeration of innocuous comments made years ago at that event, just in furtherance of someoneās stanky grift.
12 Likes
Lies left standing are lies that overtake the truth ($100 - April)
14 Likes
Very often, yes.
2 Likes
I agree. I can understand if ST wants to stay far away from them in order to avoid the associated stink.
Also, heās probably quite confident that no one will believe the claims mentioned in these posts. The Ks have no credibility.
With that saidā¦ I wouldnāt be surprised if he chooses to send them a strongly worded ācease and desist with your BS comments about me on COTHā letter. I would if I were him.
17 Likes
Without any specific knowledge of what happened in this case, but many years of observation of working students in the horse business in general, I can safely say that the possibilities are endless. Lol.
9 Likes
Yes, the working student who did actually testify at the trial looked like she had plenty more to say on the subject of both RG and his dog.
But Judge Taylor stopped her in her tracks.
27 Likes
I wonder how that could ever be proven, though? Which person was on the keyboard at that particular moment?
2 Likes
There is a way.
3 Likes
Two ways.
4 Likes
Where is the evidence that proves intent, though?
Where is the evidence that proves he ever actually touched that gun that day? No fingerprint evidence, no gunshot residue evidence. No one who saw him with a gun in his hand that day, other than the two people who both displayed their lack of credibility on the witness stand.
It will be interesting to see if the ineptitude of the police department that day ends up costing the insurance company money, on top of everything else.
18 Likes
How so?
What is Track 1 with regard to how cases are assigned?
Let me clarify something, which I guess was not as clear as I would have liked it in my post that has been quoted here.
I was simply saying - So what if Mr. Tarshis did say this stuffā¦ I am not saying Mr. Tarshis DID say it, I am saying that Jonathan Kanarek trying to make him bad for saying it is just stupid because even if he did say it, it is not a huge deal.
16 Likes
The case that the prosecutor was trying to make was that MB shot LK. No one was charged with conspiracy. Establishing premeditation is not required for a charge of attempted murder. The prosecutor succeeded in making his case that MB shot LK.
Bilinkas had the burden to prove MB was insane when he shot LK, and succeeded.
An OJ type verdict would have been straight NG on all counts, which didnāt happen here.
1 Like
