Two responses to this: first, no, they can’t, but the issue is the only remedy for the disadvantaged party is also the court system. To change the law, you have to work within it, if that makes sense. Someone has to do what they’re doing - challenge it - to prove that a. the law as written is correct and b. what remedies exist for not following it.
What often happens if a higher court finds that a lower court erred is twofold:
The case goes back to the lower court for a do-over or the higher court’s decision gets appealed to the next highest court. If that court affirms, then the original action stands namely it goes back to the first court for a do-over.
In a civil case it’s possible to just vacate or reduce a judgement but in criminal court, much like a sentencing appeal, it gets passed back to the originating court for a new sentencing.
I do hope Lara can eventually share the briefs once they’ve been decided on. I’m very interested in a legal sense as to how they are framing this appeal, but of course only want to see them after a decision has been rendered.