New filing on ecourts re MB

[ekat]

@CurrentlyHorseless

That SGF and RC settled, accepting liability for her injuries

Also, have you seen the settlements? How do you have any idea that they accepted liability for her injuries?

[Maria]

ei yi yi yi

I am a pretty shades of gray person, I am pretty good at interpretation and reading between the lines. There are certain things that are pretty black and white.

LK being all bragidousious about well, everything, to me she thought she was the bestest, bestest technical and mostest dedicated rider at MB’s, behind MB.

I am “guessing” perhaps, JH and MHG may have been riding baby horsies. And baby horsies being baby horsies may only have been training or first level whereas LK was riding at what 3rd, PSG? So I can see her not taking all relevant information and formulating her self absorbed opinion of her greatness.

OH, I forgot, wasn’t MHG knocking on GP’s door with Dee Dee? hmmmmmmmm

[trubandloki]

@ekat

@CurrentlyHorseless

That SGF and RC settled, accepting liability for her injuries

Also, have you seen the settlements? How do you have any idea that they accepted liability for her injuries?

Oh, I am sure this is like the proclamation about the police report contents. They are assuming things and stating them as facts instead of saying that they are once again making things up. It is hard for this poster to not pretend they know things while being a nobody.

[Sdel]

@trubandloki

@ekat

@CurrentlyHorseless

That SGF and RC settled, accepting liability for her injuries

Also, have you seen the settlements? How do you have any idea that they accepted liability for her injuries?

Oh, I am sure this is like the proclamation about the police report contents. They are assuming things and stating them as facts instead of saying that they are once again making things up. It is hard for this poster to not pretend they know things while being a nobody.

Like how they also “know” MB wouldn’t dare to release the recordings.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

After shooting his own student while delusional, he filed civil suits against

@CurrentlyHorseless

LK for secretly recording him (this is the one suit I think is justified).

You are once again WRONG!

He did not file a lawsuit against LK.

He did file a counter claim when LK sued him. Which is very different than filing a lawsuit.

[Sdel]

@trubandloki

He did file a counter claim when LK sued him. Which is very different than filing a lawsuit.

How dare he not roll over and just give in to LK?

Again, someone is just mad LK didn’t get her way and that MB didn’t just play the role they wanted him to play in LK’s made up story line in her head.

[SpicyPRE]

And her response to those who don’t see her brilliance is a sign, to me, of misplaced ego that will prevent her from progressing.

[smoofox]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Yes, you are missing something. If there is nothing to be accomplished by releasing them other than embarrassing MB and MHG, releasing them would be malicious.

It seems you have finally understood how things have worked in LK’s bubble for a very long time. Malicious is enjoyable to her - sadly, she has made that clear many times - and long before the shooting.

@CurrentlyHorseless

@erinmeri

@CurrentlyHorseless

No, I was saying it would be malicious for LK to release them. At this point there’s no legitimate reason to release them, and releasing them just to make Barisone and MHG look bad would be malicious.

Please explain how it would be malicious of LK to post the recordings if they contain what she says they contain? Wouldn’t that be a PSA? How would it be solely to make them look bad if they are, in fact, demonstrating malicious behavior on the part of MB or MHG??? You aren’t making sense.

It is unkind and nasty (malicious) to publicly post material for the sole purpose of embarrassing someone and making them look bad.

It is - it is also something LK has claimed to aspire to… and if those tapes contained the bombshells or evidence she has always brayed that they do (as did IM and KK), she would have had zero hesitation in publicly posting everything. She would have done it with glee.

@CurrentlyHorseless

I’ve thought all along that for some posters, the “Barisone threads” were just a pretext to maliciously trash LK and indulge in the pleasure of hate.

If these threads were really about the Barisone case, posters like Sdel and Eggbutt would not be continuing to make the discussion about LK. All the remaining issues revolve around Barisone— the insurance suit, the Krol hearing, the issue of due process, the SS case.

Lather-rinse-repeat… we are now back to the tiresome and ridiculous “pleasure of hate” nonsense.
Sorry, these threads are about “the Barisone case” and all the characters involved.
It seems to me that LK is a main player here (unless I misinterpreted something?) … and thus part of “the Barisone case” - and continues to flog her whiny nonsense and hints of bombshells publicly on YT. Thus she is continuing the “case”… with her usual tactics.

Your constant need to paint LK as a wide-eyed innocent ingenue who has never said or done anything naughty is almost as bizarre as the constant assertions you have made that IM/JK is always credible and a bastion of truth.

Or maybe it is just the pleasure of hate for you… see how that works and how accurate it is?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@ekat

@CurrentlyHorseless

I also think his suing the Lundbergs claiming he was the sole or majority owner of SGF was a travesty— he ran down the value of the farm by committing a violent act and exposed SGF to liability.

He didn’t sue the Lundbergs, FYI. They sued him. No travesty involved there. But, go on with your theories.

The Lundbergs sued him and he filed a cross complaint against them.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

The Lundbergs sued him and he filed a cross complaint against them.

So you are saying that you do not understand the difference between suing someone and filing a counter claim? Got it.

One is the person taking an action against someone. The other is a person responding to that action.

[ekat]

@CurrentlyHorseless

The Lundbergs sued him and he filed a cross complaint against them

He never sued them. They sued him in the above captioned suit.

They all filed cross-claims in the Lauren Kanarek suit, which, as I tried to explain to you ad nauseum, was not him suing the Lundbergs or SGF and had everything to do with defending the lawsuit LAUREN KANAREK filed.

You can pretend he sued the Lundbergs all you want. But there is no evidence of that happening in NJ court. Sorry if that disrupts your movie.

Also, your bold statement that he sued them regarding ownership of SGF being a travesty is patently false since that lawsuit never happened.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@smoofox

It is - it is also something LK has claimed to aspire to… and if those tapes contained the bombshells or evidence she has always brayed that they do (as did IM and KK), she would have had zero hesitation in publicly posting everything. She would have done it with glee.

All we know is that she has not posted them.

You have no basis for claiming to know that she would have posted them “with glee” if they contained what she asserts.

There is no reason to post the recordings given that the court cases are over. Further, by posting them she could expose herself to fresh claims if it turns out there’s were illegally made.

It would be dumb for her to release the recordings, whether they say what she claims, or not.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

The Lundbergs sued him and he filed a cross complaint against them.

So you are saying that you do not understand the difference between suing someone and filing a counter claim? Got it.

One is the person taking an action against someone. The other is a person responding to that action.

No. Defending against the first persons suit is responding to the action.

One can defend against a suit without filing your own suit against them.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@ekat

@CurrentlyHorseless

The Lundbergs sued him and he filed a cross complaint against them

He never sued them. They sued him in the above captioned suit.

They all filed cross-claims in the Lauren Kanarek suit, which, as I tried to explain to you ad nauseum, was not him suing the Lundbergs or SGF and had everything to do with defending the lawsuit LAUREN KANAREK filed.

You can pretend he sued the Lundbergs all you want. But there is no evidence of that happening in NJ court. Sorry if that disrupts your movie.

Also, your bold statement that he sued them regarding ownership of SGF being a travesty is patently false since that lawsuit never happened.

The court docket has filings of MBs cross complaint against the Lundbergs. He is described as “defendant snd cross complaint plaintiff”.

There was an equity lawsuit over the equity ownership of SGF. It was settled in early 2022.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

The Lundbergs sued him and he filed a cross complaint against them.

So you are saying that you do not understand the difference between suing someone and filing a counter claim? Got it.

One is the person taking an action against someone. The other is a person responding to that action.

No. Defending against the first persons suit is responding to the action.

One can defend against a suit without filing your own suit against them.

If Lauren Kanarek had never filed a lawsuit do you think any of the counter claims would exist?

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@ekat

@CurrentlyHorseless

The Lundbergs sued him and he filed a cross complaint against them

He never sued them. They sued him in the above captioned suit.

They all filed cross-claims in the Lauren Kanarek suit, which, as I tried to explain to you ad nauseum, was not him suing the Lundbergs or SGF and had everything to do with defending the lawsuit LAUREN KANAREK filed.

You can pretend he sued the Lundbergs all you want. But there is no evidence of that happening in NJ court. Sorry if that disrupts your movie.

Also, your bold statement that he sued them regarding ownership of SGF being a travesty is patently false since that lawsuit never happened.

The court docket has filings of MBs cross complaint against the Lundbergs. He is described as “defendant snd cross complaint plaintiff”.

There was an equity lawsuit over the equity ownership of SGF. It was settled in early 2022.

This has been explained to you so many times. So very many times.

The movie in your head has fallen off the sprockets again. I can hear the familiar clicking noise.

[ekat]

@CurrentlyHorseless

The court docket has filings of MBs cross complaint against the Lundbergs. He is described as “defendant snd cross complaint plaintiff”.

Where is there a lawsuit where MICHAEL BARISONE sued The Lundbergs as you asserted here:

@CurrentlyHorseless

I also think his suing the Lundbergs claiming he was the sole or majority owner of SGF was a travesty—

Can you give me a link? A filing? Anything that proves what you claim?

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@ekat

@CurrentlyHorseless

I also think his suing the Lundbergs claiming he was the sole or majority owner of SGF was a travesty— he ran down the value of the farm by committing a violent act and exposed SGF to liability.

He didn’t sue the Lundbergs, FYI. They sued him. No travesty involved there. But, go on with your theories.

The Lundbergs sued him and he filed a cross complaint against them.

So you’re saying then that MB shouldn’t defend himself lest he be called out by YOU?

That’s hilarious!!

[ekat]

@CurrentlyHorseless

There was an equity lawsuit over the equity ownership of SGF. It was settled in early 2022.

Yep. Who sued whom?

I’ll give you a hint. Michael Barisone was THE DEFENDANT.

[Sdel]

@CurrentlyHorseless

It would be dumb for her to release the recordings, whether they say what she claims, or not.

Which is why I expect Barisone will, eventually. Because she obviously isn’t going to stop making claims until he does.