Thank you!
1 Like
Iāve lost track by now. When is that supposed to happen?
I know it was already supposed to happen and got postponed due to the ineptitude with records of the place where heās staying now, correct?
3 Likes
April 25th is supposed to be the next hearing. This is the one to is to decide if he can move up a level I believe.
3 Likes
Thanks.
So by that time, it will be more than a year since he was found not guilty. And that will be his first Krol hearing, correct?
Or was that the one last fall?
2 Likes
Second. The first one moved him to Greystone with the second hearing set 6 months later.
This has been a slow process for him. In the guide (for CA) they also said that it was the courtās reponsibility to place the defendant in a situation that they could receive the required treatment they needed. They couldnāt just put them in a facility that didnāt provide it. I wish I could have found a similar guide for NJ.
5 Likes
Sadly there is not a lot of information about this in the NJ case law. That does mean that MBās case may well create case law for this. Itās a rare situation to begin with that there just isnāt a lot of opportunity for a constitutional challenge. However it sounds like they are mounting such a challenge and for a constitutional/civil rights specialist it would be an interesting case.
25 Likes
How long might the appeal take that they are making regarding the first Krol hearing?
1 Like
4 Likes
Honestly it can take years. Appellate is very slow and if the state appeals the lower court decision then the clock starts again with a higher court.
Take Roe v. Wade - the original pregnancy that started that suit was in 1969 and the child was born in June 1970. The Supreme Court didnāt hear it until 1972, it was argued twice and decided on in early 1973. The end of the appellate line is when a case is denied certiorari so it may not truly conclude until that time.
12 Likes
Thank you. It also seems that the enforcement of the lawsuit against Greystone may take time too.
1 Like
Thanks @trubandloki, I thought one of our legal experts weighed in once before but I couldnāt remember.
1 Like
I want to see what you are replying to Eggbutt but for my sanity this ignored content is just so much better. The thread moves along without the clutter!
14 Likes
It was simply the same rhetoric implying she knows more than anyone else, in particular regarding SS.
11 Likes
If the cash is not enough incentive, maybe add some sort of mantra like, āI refuse to let this person get a rise out of me.ā
10 Likes
If this case takes as long to go to trial as the G. Paltrow trial did, hopefully we will all have better self control after 2000 or so threads started and closed and started again on this case. If nothing else, MBās legal expenses will gradually be paid down in $10 increments.
9 Likes
I have not been paying any attention to the Gwyneth Paltrow case, although I just saw that it was settled in her favor today. How long did it take to get to trial?
7 years
6 Likes
WOW!
I had no idea. If she gets her attorney fees back, that should be a big pile of cash to keep her one dollar bill company.
5 Likes
But if she paid them and gets the money back, itās a wash, right?
