[QUOTE=Shammy Davis;8633530]
I would guess that crap cakes have a similar texture and smell to cow pies. Most likely a spell (or smell) check was omitted but who knows, there are some people who enjoy things I would never touch.
I agree that a 1f sorching the earth is probably of less value than watching a 2 yr old walk on. I am sure Ivor Herbert would agree. In Australia it is the punters who keep these types of records. It is ashame horsemen the world over don’t track their horses in a central data base. I was looking over their punter site the other other day and was amazed at all the information. Sadly, it is not worth a plug nickel in the states.[/QUOTE]
While I don’t entirely disagree with this fundamental way of looking at the process of selecting a 2 year old in training. After all there are no 1 furlong races nor 2 or 3 for TBs. The “time” is only one part of the process/equation. A lot of horses can run a quick 1 or 2 furlongs but in addition to the time, more important than the time is “how” they did it. This is what buyers look for, at. Does the horse do it with ease, quicken with only a subtle urging from the jock. Does the horse gallop out (keeps running past the “finish” pole) strongly, willingly little to no urging from the rider.
Most 2 year old sales the horses arrive on the sales grounds around 2 weeks before the sale. This give them time to settle into their new surrounds and get used to galloping on the track. Buyer, most of which use agents will usually start showing up in force a few days to a week latter. All of the horses go out with a saddle cloth that has their hip number on it. I like to and I am sure most do the same watch and record hip number of horses I like day in a day out. Each day I write down the numbers but do not look up their pedigrees. Don’t want to be influenced by a “sexy” pedigree. After 5 day or so I take the each days “short list” and see what hip numbers have been noted more than once. From this list I start going around to the barns inspecting the horses. I still try not to see who they are by and or out of. Just hip numbers and my comments.
One the breeze day I sit in the stand with my binoculars and watch each horse closely their gallop up to the pole and how they “break”, move into their work. I always been big fan of how they gallop out. To most of us this is the most important part. Video replay was been a part of the sales for a long time now. But it does not “capture” the gallop out. I have an assistant who writes down hip numbers that I have comments for. We can review the video of the timed work later. In the days before video there would be a member of the team who job was to count strides from pole to pole. This has been made much easier and more accurate by those who offer “stride analysis”. Video/computer stride analysis is a great tool but IMO and experience any really good horsemen can “see” a “good” horse with or with out.
After all of this is done and we have our “short list” which is not always very short the hard work begins. We take the hip numbers and review the pedigrees. For those who are working with a large budget and or are given the permission to buy/spend what ever it takes to buy the best horse/s in the sale have it MUCH easier. Those of us who are given limited resources its much harder. Horses with good to top pedigrees that tick all the boxes we can pretty much throw out. We’d be lucky to get a bid or two in. This year OBS instituted the pre-sale vet/x-ray repository that is standard for yearling sales. So buyers can save a lot money by checking that first. Horses that remain on the short list are almost always vetted by the buyer after the breeze show. Because it is pretty much the first time the horses are really being asked to run. Sh*t can and does happen under the skin after the fact.
After all this work we take our seats at the sale and hope we have enough money to buy a horse/s that we like. This is a bit more to it than the above but I don’t have the time to “write the book”.
“I agree that a 1f sorching the earth is probably of less value than watching a 2 yr old walk on.”
At the yearling sales a “big walk” is very important because it is pretty much all with have to “work with”.
For 2 year olds in training we get to see a second “card”. How they look under saddle as a racehorse. The “time” is very important, but just if not more important is how they did it. Plenty of horses can “scorch the earth” but if they look like “egg beaters” doing it they are dismissed as “cheap speed”. Especially if they have no gallop out.
Most of the best judges of racehorses on the planet work these sales. If the time had less value then a big walk. They would just buy them as yearlings most likely for a lot less money. The majority of horses that put it all together bring the most money by and large. Does not guarantee any of them will be worth the money spent a year later but statically a buyer has a much higher chance.
This is a link to the results of this sale. It can be sorted for a number of different things. Click on “under tack” and you can change from hip number to get fastest to slowest times for the distance and the horse’s price. Or by sire, consignor etc.
http://www.obssales.com/aprresults/2016/