You posted 2 times on the ‘Classical Master’ thread. Post #223 on page 12, and post #319 on page 16.
I’ll check other threads as my time permits.
You posted 2 times on the ‘Classical Master’ thread. Post #223 on page 12, and post #319 on page 16.
I’ll check other threads as my time permits.
[quote=“Pocket Pony,post:655,topic:430322”]
Same here.[/QUOTE]
Same here.
ETA: I try to stay far away from NP whenever possible. Occassional he is forced into my world and I find myself mesmerized briefly by the train wreck.
This obsession with what other posters say about NP is getting really creepy. If you are so desperate for proof, why haven’t you just gone online to see his post yourself?
You are welcome to be sceptical but that doesn’t give you grounds to demand to see proof yourself Well actually that is exactly what being skeptical is
Nope.
skep·ti·cal
ˈskeptək(ə)l/
adjective
1.
not easily convinced; having doubts or reservations.
“the public were deeply skeptical about some of the proposals”
synonyms: dubious, doubtful, taking something with a pinch of salt, doubting
It’s entirely possible to be skeptical and silent.
Is this thread gonna devolve into another 12 pages of arguing with csaper?
I’ll bet yes. Who wants popcorn? Wine is in the fridge…
Only if people take the bait… I don’t understand arguing with certain folk. Just smile, say bless your heart, and scroll down.
I think we make the mistake of thinking a logical conversation can be had. But clearly that is not the case.
I like the just ignore theory now!
For the record, I saw the video that NP posted (both of them, edited and not edited).
I feel horrible for the poor person who was called in the middle of the night by him.
when Manni01 and Csaper say “oh…its not a big deal” I will remind them that this person had to call the police on NP and SW is trying to get people fired.
Anyways, this isn’t about them, that was the only reason I posted that. Wake up call. this is some serious stuff. No joke.
I have not read everything- sorry I actually have a life-
but please note: just because someone thinks the [edit] get too much attention
does not mean they DEFEND said [edit]. nope.
You are sometimes missing the point if you think so.
For some [edit]- any attention is better than no attention- so take that into consideration- maybe
Manni has specifically and emphatically defended NP, his riding, and his behavior on other threads, go look up the info. Its all there.
However, I think it’s just a game to her, these are not real people getting harassed, or in danger of loosing her job. I can’t say anything else, that is her choice.
I am so glad this thread has the new info about IRL police activity. That is why this thread should stay open. NP and SW are causing real harm to real people. I guess that is ok with some here. Not me. As I said 6 months ago, and over and over…NP creeps me out. This is why. I knew it was likely he would cross the line (again)
I did not not attack anyone by name
It was a general comment
Unfotunately the edit looks like I must have named people.
I did not name anyone.
yet all the threads attacking named individuals are untouched,
fascinating
We have removed some recent personal commentary and are posting a reminder to avoid the name calling, regardless of how fitting you may believe it to be. It’s generally fine to share your positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, professionals, products, articles re: the industry, but please do so without the personal commentary.
This thread has also recently gone off on a tangent regarding another largely unrelated situation/individual, so let’s please rein in that line of discussion.
Thanks,
Mod 1
The only point I was trying to make- without ever naming any names btw-
is that just because some of us may chime in on the questionable value of these threads which btw actually name people
it does not mean we are DEFENDING these people.
This should be obvious from the posts
I say WE but I am just guessing that I am not alone in this.
Free speech etc- just another opinion- we are all allowed to have one-
but sure- press that alert button .
We know who you are. lol
Point is that some of these targeted people- if am I allowed to say people- thrive on any publicity- even bad publicity.
Some of them are also apparently mentally disturbed. It is not always helpful to harass the mentally disturbed.
You- the alert button pusher- are obviously entitled to express a different opinion and , as always, I wont be reporting you to the mods for that
signed- in case not obvious- NOT a fan of NP, DH, SW. CK ,etc etc. -since people insist on misinterpreting the posts.
Just ignore posters you do not wish to engage. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions – they are not necessarily entitled to responses. It will frustrate them to be ignored. Some people, regardless of their viewpoint, will not be pursuaded.
Yes, and I consider that to be a rare occurrence, since there are many who go on and on about him on every thread that comes up. And you may also see that I suggested that COTH not try to become the “dressage police” and report him to whatever PTB for showing as an amateur. And I think I also said that I like his horse and I hope she finds a nice home (though I do feel badly for her).
Hahahaha, I took the bait and fell for it! :lol::lol:
Sometimes it is hard to just nod and smile and step over, around and through the jeers and sneers and attempts to light fires and point fingers… and occasionally I fail. I am only human, after all.
Some love to post to police others and tell them what to do - I would just suggest that that is the moderators’ job.
@BigMama1 You seem very determined to twist the truth until it is unrecognizable.
If someone wanting to be believed as a corroborating witness to off site misdeeds… offers up their past posting history as a reference… I will look into it.
In this case a quick look at the past history showed it was not what it was touted to be and now that makes me skeptical that anything this poster ‘testifies’ about is like-wise suspect.
Well bless your heart…