I am not one of the skeptics who let others belittle them into silence acquiescence.
Thanks forgiving me the opportunity to establish that.
I am not one of the skeptics who let others belittle them into silence acquiescence.
Thanks forgiving me the opportunity to establish that.
Originally posted by BigMama1 View Post
You are welcome to be sceptical but that doesn’t give you grounds to demand to see proof yourself Well actually that is exactly what being skeptical is
or dictate to people how they should be posting. Reminding another of the rules and trying to keep a valuable thread open is not dictating.
If you choose to give NP the benefit of the doubt then you are free to do so. being suspicious of posters with a history of rabid antipathy on a subject is not the same as giving someone the benefit of the doubt.
Speaking of twisting peoples words… can I suggest that the correct way for you to add your own words to someone elses’ comments in their own post that you quote would be to do so, in bold as you have done or in another color or maybe italics, and then add a note ‘My comments in bold/color/italics’ to distinguish what you’ve added from what the poster you quote actually wrote themselves?
Otherwise it looks like you are just… well… twisting someones’ words
Can’t believe I’m actually having to parse this out, but here goes. First you claimed that it was okay to demand someone post something to prove something to you, that it was part of the definition of being “skeptical.”
I then posted a dictionary definition of skeptical.
You then said you would not be “belittled into silence (sic) acquiescence”
FYI, it is possible to be skeptical, and express your skepticism; without sealioning, without badgering and without being a jerk. That would make for a refreshing change and a more civil conversation.
The bold added to the text is mine.
Let’s keep this on subject please so we can help out ThistleDew…ok? thanks. My mention of Manni and Csaper was not an invitation to go off the deep end, sheesh who let the cats out?
Please let me know if I can help, at any rate sending you massive jingles…again so sorry you had this experience. Wishing you the best of luck, hope it blows over soon.
At least this is about dressage, maybe, and not about feminine hygiene products like over on off topic. :eek::eek::eek: I don’t think NP needs defending.
I think the information on this thread from those who have gotten the phone calls from the self styled expert are helpful to those who do not know him. I learned about NP from some of the old threads on Coth.
The Thompson guy from SC who had Old Orchard Farm is mentioned on the missing horses forum. I was warmed about him on Coth years ago. Posters on Coth are great to warn the uninformed about dangers out there in the horse world.
Thank you Sendenhorse. I’m just keeping on keeping on. I have too much going on to worry about things that I cannot change. I will follow what avenues I can while keeping my integrity. I think most reasonable people will see the reality of the situation. I appreciate eveeyone’s concern.
Good luck ThistleDew. I don’t think your reputation will suffer because of NP’a actions. Just like with SW, anybody with any knowledge of the industry wont take him
seriously, only complete newbies and morons believe anything either of them post.
REALLY? That ship sailed 5 pages ago Senden and you were instrumental in pushing it out into the deep end. Now you want to put on your moderator hat and tow it back to the dock? :rolleyes:
Several of us have asked repeatedly for the NP groupies to take their fan club to a thread of their own… but y’all have been intent on getting this valuable thread closed.
You should name your ship the C.O.T.H. Hypocrazy
Just curious why the SW thread is so “valuable” yet people get jumped on every time they post about NP anywhere?
This thread consolidates all the info into one area.
I never saw a thread about SW until this one was started (there was one other specifically about SW that was started at the same time as this one). Prior to this, everything I found was scattered bits across the net. For someone casually researching SW, those scattered bits probably wouldn’t be found. This thread ties it all together AND adds to them.
Whereas NP has several other threads focused solely on his training, info on his actions, and replies from him, that allow someone to get an overall idea of who NP is and what kind of trainer he is.
However, now that SW and NP are working together to promote each others version of the truth, then maybe they need to be discussed as one unit. Two sides of the same coin?
Thistle dew, how are you doing now? Is there anything we/I can do to help?
I think it is best to take it to PM’s. I think we need to step back. I am sure she is confident and professional enough to go it alone. It is a police matter now. JMHO
Be cautious sharing personal stuff with anyone who pretends to be your friend here
but talks out of both sides of mouth and loves to stir the pot.
just sayin… be careful
For example- there is someone on this thread who may send you supportive messages but will also press the alert button against you when she wants to stir the pot.
Two faced and not trustworthy
Trust no one except your real life friends and legal counsel
I think this goes with out saying.
I am genuinely concerned about her, and no I don’t expect or need to be her friend. I just feel bad this happened to her. Really.
Sure, that sounds good. I just want to keep this thread focused on the task at hand, and not these tangents and digs at my supposed wretched character
Ok, so good to hear from you. As someone who had my own run-ins with Nick, I totally get it and support you 200%.
Best of luck and still sending massive jingles!
yup- be careful :eek:
I cannot believe I missed the inevitable banning of csaper :lol::lol::lol:
BLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEP
Better now??? lol