Interesting that you’ve come back to resurrect this post and have seen fit to make personal mention and reference to me.
Interesting also that you’ve decided what I have and haven’t done and without actually knowing or discussing or seeing me write anything about what I’ve seen or not.
Might I suggest if you’ve just come here to make personal insults and accusations that it’s neither appropriate nor the purpose of this Bulletin board.
Interesting also that you’ve seen fit to draw attention to your somewhat peculiar web discussion and the fact that the World Horse Welfare (ex International League for the Protection of Horses) have decided that you’re not offering anything they wish to endorse or make use of.
Might I suggest that if you’re eagre to ensure your product is marketed and sold as an innovative invention that is empathetic and good for horses that it might not have been prudent or appropriate to draw attention to this decision by World Horse Welfare.
However in truth, I actually don’t believe a single thing you’ve posted on the link you’ve provided.
You posted that you’d received the following…
Dear Simon
I am so upset! World Horse Welfare has forbidden me to use the saddlechariot on my ponies. Fullstop. I tried to phone you a few minutes ago but there was only an answermachine (I left a message). I have to cancel you and Obama for next week-end. I want to talk to you and I will try to phone you again tomorrow, or maybe you could phone me on XXXXX-XXXXXX or my mobile (which I do not always carry with me (XXXXX-XXXXXX). I am adding to your list of being mistreated by a horse organisation! I am so sad.
Speak to you soon.
.
You honestly want us to believe that a customer was thinking of just having a look at your vehicle and decided that before she did that she’d best speak to World Horse Welfare! Yeh right! You also want us to believe that whoever it was that phoned also has to cancel a date with President Obama!? What are you on!!!
You also said in your link posting:
It isn’t just losing the demonstration fee, and a customer that is the problem. I have to deal on the phone with a very scared lady, convinced that if I expose what World Horse welfare are doing, they will take away her much loved pet.
If World Horse Welfare are so vindictive to someone who has looked after a couple of animals for years, I am sure that public opinion will ensure the ponies are restored to their rightful keeper. But an organisation that can ban a product, the Saddlechariot, that they have never looked at, and for no reason, is probably stupid and vicious enough to do anything, so I am forced to make this issue public, and hope that World Horse welfare supporters will ensure the organisation continue to take out their anger on me, not on those who have looked after rescue ponies for years.
So here is World Horse Welfare, who ban use of the Saddlechariot and mak e brutal threats to those in their power, with Princess Anne as number one Trustee
Trust me World Horse Welfare have a lot more important things to deal with than be concerned about a single pony whose owner might be barking mad and going to look at something cheap and chatty in Cumbria as well as slotting in a meeting with President Obama!!!
I also note you mention that Driving for the Disabled have also suggested that your erm what is it? chariot, vehicle, thing on wheels… whatever is not suitable or appropriate for their use and that you’re disgruntled. Well get over it!
I note your dissatisfaction with Princess Anne and your suggestion that she’s personally got it in for you. So it seems to me that in your head, I’m in good company!
Still, they are the establishment and believe in whips and bits and spurs, so they must be right, and I am just an ignorant peasant who believes in safety and kindness to the ponies and opportunities for the disabled. My wheelchair version being tested in Exeter in the picture at the top is blocked from any use with the disabled by, guess who, Riding for the Disabled.
Well they have managed to stuff me royally.
I feel that maybe those who lend their names to these organisations, should look to see what is being done in their names. Maybe I deserve to be treated like a pariah by the equestrian establishment, and maybe banning a legal safe product is reasonable given what I have done, but with the exception of modern terror laws, those who are punished are told what their crime is. If I have done something so evil that I deserve 9 years of being sent to Coventry and vilified, maybe someone would like to tell me what I have done wrong.
I note that you’re disappointed that Princess Anne as Patron of both these organisations hasn’t persuaded either of them that they absolutely must endorse them and buy them. Seems you’re annoyed she’s not even been able to get her own father to buy one and that’s irritating the heck out of you.
It’s not doing you any favours telling us all that here! But I wouldn’t suggest you get all silly and cry baby over that. Aside from the fact you seem to have her falsely labelled as some sort of whip using horse beater, you need to know that to my certain knowledge she’s not open to offers for advertising and promotions. You also need to know that both she and her father are well known for being independent of mind and opinionated and knowing what they want and don’t want.
So folks don’t want your wonderful product and don’t recognise it as the marvel you thought it was. Live and learn! Could be that either your product isn’t what was wanted or your marketing was crap or both.
Get over it !!!