But yes, it is. I, too, wonder about the ātapes.ā How many times have I said, āIām going to kill her/himā in a moment of frustration or anger? Language is complex, and we often say things in a metaphorical sense to express our emotions. The quote about how MB would ābash LKās head inā - was said to a child. How was it prompted? What was the context? Was she attempting to placate a childās fear? Was the child expressing fear that MHG or MB was going to get hurt? What was the tone in which it was said? It strikes me that (if it was even what she said) it was not meant as threat to LK, but as a clumsy attempt to tell the child that he/she was going to be protected by MB, as a way to soothe fear or anger.
Laugh. Maybe that was why he was being so needy all evening. If he was out, he wanted in, if he was in he wanted out.
Probably making me prove my endless love for him because I hurt his feelings.
I used my happy voice as I said how annoyed I wasā¦
This came from Inigo_Montoya, who may be referencing some or the ātapesā. It could also be complete fol-de-rol, based solely in rumor, hearsay, and paranoia. Nothing was offered to substantiate this allegation.
The same questions about tone and context would apply to the comments about the officers responses and thought about the ādocumentsā MB wanted signed. She leads into relating that exchange with her having asked if a release from liability to allow him to kill herā¦ā¦and it seems to me that was a question designed to suggest to the officer something nefarious about a standard liability release we have all routinely signed in order to ride on someone elseās property. She even refers to the fact that much of the document was posted on a sign by the barn, but throw in a few adjectives and describe the paper as horrifying the police and suggesting MB was mad because he was ācaughtā in some horrid plan and to some it can easily paint a different picture.
That same kind of speech pattern/leading/innuendo works for threats as well. It might not look like a threat to an outsider, written down, or without seeing the accompanying nonverbal behavior, but I can assure you, it can make a person very uncomfortable and feel in danger if they are constantly subjected to it.
It is likely the same story for the idea that the BI & FM said she could stay. Remember she also said she wasnāt home at the time because RC tried to ābreak inā. RC was supposedly only supposed to leave a list of the āviolationsā. Based on the smoke and mirrors on all the other situations, it is possible that they didnāt get an actual sign off about staying but decided based on the wording of the document left that if they āfixed itā that meant they could stay when the BI & FM meant it had to be fixed and inspected by properly licensed individuals before it could be re-inhabited.
As I recall, the gun charge is āunlawful use of a firearmā. Iām guessing that pointing a gun at someone and ordering them off your property at gun point would be an unlawful use of a firearm.
Possibly the DA charged him with that so that if the attempted murder charge fails, because he successfully argues your scenario, they can still get him on āunlawful use of a firearm.ā
How was the second gun charge worded?
Even he didnāt go over there planning to kill her, and just lost his temper in the moment, by shooting her Iād think he was still demonstrating intent, so still attempted murder.
I agree my scenario still probably qualifies as attempted murder. Iām just saying what I think could have happened, not arguing for a particular verdict.