IM said that he has already pled “not guilty by reason of insanity” and that fits with civil suit against the police. He is saying that he was temporarily insane at the time of the shooting, I believe, and that he currently has no memory of an interval of time that particular day. I don’t think that he is claiming to be insane now.
The case that seems similar to me is the George Zimmerman/Trayvon Martin shooting in Florida. Zimmerman thought Martin looked suspicious. Zimmerman approached him, even though 911 dispatcher told him not to. A physical altercation ensued. Zimmerman said he feared for his life and fatally shot Martin.
The outcome was acquittal.
Not saying Barisone will or should be acquitted.
But the cases look similar if the scenario is as suggesed: Barison e went to get them to leave or retract child abuse charges. A verbal and physical confrontation ensued and Barisone felt in danger and fired or the gun fired in some struugle.
I think the “insanity” is that trauma and stress produced a disassociate d stae, not that he was crazy.
The problem with this is the vast ocean between both state’s attitude toward such incidents. FL is stand your ground while NJ is duty to retreat. Legally, MB had the obligation to leave. He has the additional burden of proving that he was unable to flee in order to use self defense where as Zimmerman had no such obligation.
Alright, for those of us who got bogged down following the various threads- can someone give me a link to a good synopsis so I don’t have to spend hours on the various threads? I know that LK is Lauren Kanarek, MB is Michael Barisone, RG is Lauren’s boyfriend Rob Goodwin but who are RC and MHG?
RC is Ruth Cox, the owner of the gun; MHG is Mary Haskins Gray, MBs girlfriend.
The threads are incredibly repetitive, with the same facts and claims and speculations occurring in pretty much each one, so if you pick any one thread and read it, you’ll probably get 97% of the information you’d get from reading all the threads.
Of course it hasn’t been established. The trial is yet to come. His lawyer has not made an opening sta tement outlining the defense s trategy. No one, including Barisone, has testified. n
This is all just friendly, I hope, speculation of an interesting legal case, not anyone trying to prove their take is true and others are false.
The obligation to retreat is an interesting twist. I imagine there are as many differing interpretations of that as of stand your ground, i.e., what circumstances would ma k e that obligation vanish and be replaced by self defense?
I imagine that a key element will be the judge’s charge to the jury. The judge could say, under the NJ law, that he did have an obligation to retreat or say that he did have a right to defense. Or not mention it and let the jury decide.
There’s the question of whether requiring a property owner to leave their own property before self defense can be used is a reasonable expectation. Here of course, there are many acres to retreat to, but the home was apparently no longer available for anyone’s use but the tenant. In a shared space retreat becomes pretty tricky.
I think this is a type of misogyny displayed there.
The police dismissed his claims, the police did not bother taking 2 sides.
and of folks having doubts that ‘a big strong man’ can’t defend himself against the little lady - who has an equally big and strong boyfriend