"Sloping croup"

[QUOTE=LaurieB;8049058]
So then the vast majority of Olympic/Grand Prix/4 Star horses that competed in the 1950s, 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s were not top sport horses? :confused:[/QUOTE]

Exactly, LaurieB.
There are a few pages on FB where fabulous pictures of great hunters and jumpers are posted - most of those horses were Thoroughbreds.
Whenever I see those pictures I just shake my heads at the ignorance of those who say things like “TBs kill the jump”.
Those horses - and by that I don’t mean those actual individuals - but those Thoroughbred horses are still out there.

Fred, people who do not share your nostalgia of good old days are not necessarly ignorant. Many breeders of great horses of the past and of the present times says that TB kill the jump, not that they are useless. Good TB are still used to add some caracteristics, but in fact, they consider that the cross with TB are generally best at producing broodmares, as they are generally less powerfull. And people who think that breeders and trainers are just not looking for TB anymore are just plain wrong. The holsteiner verband as well as many top stallion owners everywhere in Europe are looking everywhere, from New Zealand to Argentina, From US to Ireland, for the next Ladykiller or Furioso but do not seem to be able to find them.

[QUOTE=Fred;8050062]
Exactly, LaurieB.
There are a few pages on FB where fabulous pictures of great hunters and jumpers are posted - most of those horses were Thoroughbreds.
Whenever I see those pictures I just shake my heads at the ignorance of those who say things like “TBs kill the jump”.
Those horses - and by that I don’t mean those actual individuals - but those Thoroughbred horses are still out there.[/QUOTE]

Seeing is believing, however.

It would be immensely helpful, if we could refer to TB horses currently in those big rings as examples, rather than recite the same old names. Trainers and riders won’t find what they aren’t looking for, and it seems that most who are looking at TB’s are on small budgets, there to ‘rescue’ and ‘re-home,’ and even if they find the athletic and capable ones, don’t put them on a career track that will see them reach the big rings.

Joe Fargis has a student, Grant Chungo, in Virginia, whose OTTB, Ballinore, has started doing the smaller Grand Prixs. My daughter Anna (a couple years younger than Grant) was just starting to ride our TB mare Camille, when Ballinore was started. Ballinore, a gelding, kept going, but we chose to breed Camille, who has since had an ‘every other year’ carreer.

To keep on topic, Camille has a pretty long croup, and is a a nice, classic hunter -type, while Ballinore is much more lanky and angular. Camille is expecting her 3rd foal by As Di Villagana within the next few weeks…As Di Villagana is a compact and rather square horse at 16 h.

Conformation-wise, the first, As Di Ani Z (2008 m), is pretty much a feminine version of her sire, and the second, As Di Valentia, is a masculine version of his dam. Both are very attractive, and croup-wise, I’d say all 4 horses (sire, dam, and offspring) are fairly similar in angulation.

Both offspring jump beautifully, plenty of scope. We kept the mare, bred her once, and have begun to compete her in the jumpers; As Di Valentia (sold to Diane Halpin, and now belongs to Bill Schaub) made his made his WEF debut in the hunter ring two weeks ago, with winning rounds and a Res. Ch.

The stallion we chose for As Di Ani Z was Jaguar Mail (SF, 3/4 TB, Haras Brullmail, via Hilltop) and we have gotten a very different type from the others out of that cross. Now 3, he is tall (closing in on 17h), lanky, and very much the athletic jumper type. So far his croup is rather sloping; whatever the angles, he has a very powerful (and careful) hind end, and shows phenomenal scope in his free-jump.

His nicely line-bred pedigree drew quite a lot of attention, but not a lot of interest in him as a stallion prospect. Swimming in mares that are related to him (and with the chance to produce another stallion with the same cross), I had him gelded last month, and he will begin to work under saddle shortly (he was backed late last year).

My point here is that we have used our (Han approved, high-score outside mare at MAHB, 2010) TB mare as the basis of our program, with great results, have gotten very nice horses, and maybe one phenomenal one–TB has not killed anything at all, and the croups are not just one type.

[QUOTE=Elles;8049397]
The funny thing is that in the past often the F1 cross turned out all right but that the problems started in the following generations… At least that is what people always said.[/QUOTE]

http://www.bokt.nl/forums/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=158662
F1 = de eerste kruising tussen twee rassen, bijvoorbeeldpuur gelders x puur Volbloed. F2 is dan de volgende generatie, F3 de daaropvolgende.

Bij een pure F1 kan je in theorie kiezen uit drie opties:

  1. een andere F1
  2. een van de twee rassen waaruit de F1 bestaat
  3. Een derde ras

Volgens de theorie krijg je de meest spreiding als je naar F1 gaat. Met een ander ras heb je de grote kans dat het derde ras gaat overheersen. Als je teruggaat op een van de twee rassen waaruit de F1 bestaat krijg je iets wat meer op dat ras lijkt.

Het meest voorspelbare resultaat krijg je dus als je naar optie 2) gaat. Helaas zijn er maar erg weinig stamboeken die echt zuiver zijn. KWPN is niet bepaald een ras, en zelfs de oude Gelderse paarden hadden vrij veel vreemde invloeden.

Translation
F1 = first cross between two breeds, for example pure Gelder x pure Thoroughbred. F2 than is the next generation, F3 the next.

With a pure F1 you in theory have three options to cross with:

  1. another F1
  2. one of the two races that make up the F1 exists
  3. a third breed

According to the theory you get most spread / scattering (?) of genes if you go to an F1. With a different breed you have the high probability that the third breed is going to dominate. If you go back on one of the two breeds that make up the F1 you get something that looks more like that breed.

The most predictable result you get if you go to option 2). Unfortunately, there are very little studbooks that really are pure. KWPN is not exactly a breed, and even the old Gelders horses had rather a lot of foreign / different influences.

PLEASE don’t turn this into another TB vs. WB thing. this is about sloping croups.

it’d be interesting to see more insight in that regard - re: sloping croups. if you want more TB vs WB fodder all you need to do is review any of bayhawk’s frothy posts.

Unfortunately, due to the onslaught of WBs in our world, you will not see many TBs in the show ring anymore. Kudos to those promoting TB classes and retraining contests.
The TB has been deemed not “amateur” friendly. Back in the “glory” days, we learned to ride on these horses and they taught us to stay in the tack and become a quiet effective rider. And boy could they jump!
And they still can!

[QUOTE=Cumano;8050089]
Fred, people who do not share your nostalgia of good old days are not necessarly ignorant. Many breeders of great horses of the past and of the present times says that TB kill the jump, not that they are useless. Good TB are still used to add some caracteristics, but in fact, they consider that the cross with TB are generally best at producing broodmares, as they are generally less powerfull. And people who think that breeders and trainers are just not looking for TB anymore are just plain wrong. The holsteiner verband as well as many top stallion owners everywhere in Europe are looking everywhere, from New Zealand to Argentina, From US to Ireland, for the next Ladykiller or Furioso but do not seem to be able to find them.[/QUOTE]

You do realize that her stallion sired a GP jumper, right?

I agree with the OP that it can be difficult to assess angles on the hindquarters. The stifle may not be very prominent and all of the muscling can make pinpointing the location of joints difficult.

[QUOTE=grayarabpony;8050266]
I agree with the OP that it can be difficult to assess angles on the hindquarters. The stifle may not be very prominent and all of the muscling can make pinpointing the location of joints difficult.[/QUOTE]

i find what helps is finding the actual bone, especially when assessing young stock or race horses. instead of measuring the delineating line of their bodies, i’ll feel around and locate the actual joint (IE, in most cases the actual HIP is not where it may look in a young horse) and look at the hip to stifle, femur slope, etc.

I’m no expert in jumpers, but I’ve personally seen several sloping croups that were GP jumpers. Several people posted links to horses with sloping croups that are GP (and in most cases, international GP) jumpers. And in the dressage world, it isn’t uncommon to see a more sloping croup.

The ultimate flat croup is seen in the Arabian - and they often have non-functional hindquarters (sorry Arab people - I know there are a lot of great Arabs out there, but they usually aren’t the “halter ideal”).

I guess I don’t see a sloping croup as an issue in itself - now, when you combine it w/ a weak back, a poor loin, upright hind leg, whatever - then you have an issue. Or, like any conformational trait - if it is extreme (and that is what I think of a gooserump as - and extreme slope), then you may have a less functioning hind leg. In general, extreme ANYTHING ends up being a problem, doesn’t it? And I think that is why the halter horses (in any breed) end up being non-functional horses - they take “desirable” traits and take them to an extreme.

If someone is evaluating a prospect, they are going to be more critical in assessing conformation.

There are exceptions to rule in performance horses. That doesn’t mean that breeders should not strive to breed the best of the best, to eliminate any potential limitation in ability. There are many aspects that go into if a horse will be successful or not with or without obvious comformation flaws. Overall sustainability and soundness is what every breeder should strive to obtain.

I’d be more willing to buy a proven performance horse with conformation flaws than invest in a young horse. All things being equal, I would still buy a horse who is more conformationally correct.

[QUOTE=MysticOakRanch;8050342]
I’m no expert in jumpers, but I’ve personally seen several sloping croups that were GP jumpers. Several people posted links to horses with sloping croups that are GP (and in most cases, international GP) jumpers. And in the dressage world, it isn’t uncommon to see a more sloping croup.

The ultimate flat croup is seen in the Arabian - and they often have non-functional hindquarters (sorry Arab people - I know there are a lot of great Arabs out there, but they usually aren’t the “halter ideal”).

I guess I don’t see a sloping croup as an issue in itself - now, when you combine it w/ a weak back, a poor loin, upright hind leg, whatever - then you have an issue. Or, like any conformational trait - if it is extreme (and that is what I think of a gooserump as - and extreme slope), then you may have a less functioning hind leg. In general, extreme ANYTHING ends up being a problem, doesn’t it? And I think that is why the halter horses (in any breed) end up being non-functional horses - they take “desirable” traits and take them to an extreme.[/QUOTE]

while i think that it’s a dangerous generality to say arabs have the ultimate flat croup (i think more of driving breeds, where it is considered a good conformation trait) check out this guy:
http://www.mirageltd.com/photos/the_greats/Gai-Parada.jpg

considered a very prominent horse (with six crosses to skowronek, the most influential arabian horse worldwide) this horse should not have been a riding candidate (he was shown in pleasure driving because his conformation was limiting) given his weak loin connection, upward sloped croup, short limited pelvic slope (generally speaking, a longer sloped pelvis is concurrent with jump ability) and practically NON-existent femur angle. he would be an example of an extreme, most arabs are NOT built like him.

which brings me to the discussion (not trying to go on an arabian tangent) where it’s easy to see the difference between him and the horses in question. you can look at him and see a short upright femur with poor angles, extremely long back with a high hip and weak loin connection, low stifle, very short (but extremely upright… nearly 2x more upright than his pelvic angle) croup. and then you can look at OP’s horses who look like a godsend in comparision: with a good hip, good length of back, average loin connection, straight hocks with very open femur angles. i can’t say i love all of them equally (the one with very straight hind end in particular) but the croup combined with an open hock (read: straight) would be indicative of a good, long stride and bodes well for a jumper.

damn tangent, but that pic of gai-parada, he is on a slope. I think he’d be butt high if his tail were down and have a downhill build otherwise. But that’s off 1 single picture.

I have learned that the Arabian “conformation” photos are not accurate.

One day I went to an Arabian breeding farm. One of the owners was working on training an Arabian stallion to pose for Arabian halter. This stallion had an “apple” croup, with a very round topline of the croup, definitely NOT flat. Well, after the owner lashed the horse’s front cannons with a springy whip, that horse tensed his back muscles, parked out some, flattened out his “apple” croup and ended up looking like he had a flat, high croup. I would not have believed that this was possible until I saw the training process with my own eyes.

Since then I have never believed that a posed picture of an Arabian show his true conformation, and if I could afford breeding I would never select an Arabian stallion based on a posed photograph.

Cumano, you seem to have misunderstood both the content and the point of my post.
I apologise if my wording was perhaps not clear enough?
I am not “nostalgic for the good old days” as you suggest.
My point was that those exceptional TB horses which existed then did not “kill the jump” and they were not anomalies, and that those incredible TB athletes are still out there - even if people are not using them or don’t recognize them.
I believe this so strongly that the TB has been the foundation of my very small and modest breeding program.
Tilting at windmills and swimming upstream? Maybe.
There are many reasons we are not seeing as many TBs in the jumper ring, as Mary O mentioned. But the reasons are not the lack of athleticism and jumping ability.

I am always surprised and saddened when I see someone who feels the need to denigrate a breed. To me that does show ignorance.
I also wonder if certain stallion owners reject clients with TB mares, telling them they are wasting their time and their money, that a TB mare will kill the jump? - or do they just pocket the money?

Sorry to everyone for returning to the tangent.
Back to the subject of sloping croups.

Baloubet du Rouet is chestnut, you’re right, but the picture was Balou du Rouet

[QUOTE=D_BaldStockings;8049665]
Baloubet du Rouet is listed on Horsetelex as chestnut…
http://www.horsetelex.com/horses/pedigree/2859[/QUOTE]

The photo you posted of the bay horse with sloping croup was misidentified in earlier post as Baloubet du Rouet.

The bay horse that was pictured is Baloubet’s son Balou du Rouet (bay, 4 matching white socks, #24 world jumping sires 2014)

Baloubet is chestnut and, imho, does not have sloping croup:

http://lamias.se/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/baloubet.jpg

[QUOTE=halt;8050397]
while i think that it’s a dangerous generality to say arabs have the ultimate flat croup (i think more of driving breeds, where it is considered a good conformation trait) check out this guy:
http://www.mirageltd.com/photos/the_greats/Gai-Parada.jpg

considered a very prominent horse (with six crosses to skowronek, the most influential arabian horse worldwide) this horse should not have been a riding candidate (he was shown in pleasure driving because his conformation was limiting) given his weak loin connection, upward sloped croup, short limited pelvic slope (generally speaking, a longer sloped pelvis is concurrent with jump ability) and practically NON-existent femur angle. he would be an example of an extreme, most arabs are NOT built like him.

which brings me to the discussion (not trying to go on an arabian tangent) where it’s easy to see the difference between him and the horses in question. you can look at him and see a short upright femur with poor angles, extremely long back with a high hip and weak loin connection, low stifle, very short (but extremely upright… nearly 2x more upright than his pelvic angle) croup. and then you can look at OP’s horses who look like a godsend in comparision: with a good hip, good length of back, average loin connection, straight hocks with very open femur angles. i can’t say i love all of them equally (the one with very straight hind end in particular) but the croup combined with an open hock (read: straight) would be indicative of a good, long stride and bodes well for a jumper.[/QUOTE]

Sorry, but one photo isn’t the end of the world… That was a nice stallion being posed to flatten the croup. There are other shots of him here
http://www.animalpages.com/gaiparada/bio.html

And he had a reserve champion in English Pleasure: that would be RIDING.

Do check your anatomy as to where the femur runs; a short croup (reflecting tailset and carriage) may or may not correspond to a short femur.

Of course every horse can be improved upon, but assessing an Arabian by WB standards is ‘interesting’ to say the least.

“Poor” Gai Parada passed away at age 24 after siring 459 foals by live cover, no doubt due to his weak conformation -ha!

-Back to your sloping croup discussion

[QUOTE=mareslave;8050789]
The photo you posted of the bay horse with sloping croup was misidentified in earlier post as Baloubet du Rouet.

The bay horse that was pictured is Baloubet’s son Balou du Rouet (bay, 4 matching white socks, #24 world jumping sires 2014)

Baloubet is chestnut and, imho, does not have sloping croup:

http://lamias.se/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/baloubet.jpg[/QUOTE]

You are absolutely correct, I posted the wrong photo. I do consider Baloubet du rouet to have a sloping croup - in the photo you posted.

Additionally, these 2 photos show the great flixibility of the moving horse: now that is one key component to a great jumper
https://36.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lwtwir8ZM01r8bg0ho1_500.jpg
http://www.baloubetdurouet.com/galeria/images/27.jpg

Additionally, note the muscling atop the croup near the SI, quite telling of this horse’s power.

[QUOTE=halt;8050297]
i find what helps is finding the actual bone, especially when assessing young stock or race horses. instead of measuring the delineating line of their bodies, i’ll feel around and locate the actual joint (IE, in most cases the actual HIP is not where it may look in a young horse) and look at the hip to stifle, femur slope, etc.[/QUOTE]

yes, you have to find the joints and their relations to either. That is key, along with loin coupling, stifle placement, etc as JB already said.

I think using body paint on the horse would be the way to go until one develops an eye for seeing the joints and how they relate to each other!

you’re right – so, these pictures are better:
http://www.animalpages.com/gaiparada/pix/gaiparada1-sm.jpg
http://images47.fotki.com/v1402/photos/5/591471/2290564/Gai_Parada_020-vi.jpg
http://www.blujay.com/1/525/4075851_s1_i1_899.jpg

in every picture, he is extremely flat backed, with a croup that slopes up TWO TIMES MORE than his slope of his femur. i thought i was doing the old man a favor by posting his most flattering picture. if you are confused about something i said, or would like me to elaborate on how i made my assessment, i will. but the point of the matter is that is a stallion with a flat back and sloping croup (upwards, not downwards) with a terribly weak loin connection.

nowhere did i compare him to ‘wb’ standards. he may have been ridden, but he was not a riding horse.