Staying safe around a "Parelli" .. update post 147

My instructor had me lead with horse’s throatlatch at my shoulder. My mare will also lead while farther behind me, but she’s a little goofy at times and I wouldn’t know what she is doing back there. She gets led that way if we are going somewhere where we both can’t get through at the same time, like yesterday when we were trying to find a way around a washed out trail.

There is a Smokie Brannaman video on his FB page where he works a horse named Purdy. Actually, there’s a series of him with her. He swears she is a Parelli horse because of how she reacts, and he spends quite a bit of time just getting her to walk around him in a circle. She acts like she is used to being chased. Whether you blame it on Parelli tactics or just crappy horsemanship, its obvious the mare is not relaxed with basic handling.

[QUOTE=RugBug;8640860]
I lead with the horse’s head at my shoulder…but the lead rope is quite slack. At least enough room that my hand can be down by my side and there is no tension in the rope. I expect my horses to stay that way no matter how fast or slow I’m walking. It is their responsibility to keep up and to keep slack in the rope. I will not drag them around. Leading for me is less about the rope and more about where I am going and how fast I’m going there. If you train them, they will come. :smiley: I also make them lead from both sides so I have the option…and expectations remain the same. I’m not saying they are good enough that I can remove the lead rope and they will follow me around, but I don’t need a “short rope” to keep them where I want them.[/QUOTE]

And wear is your other hand?

Since I have this duplicate post because the forum was being unresponsive, I will expand. I suspect your left hand is eitther further down the rope or youbstill have significant bite after your right hand.
I see so many who lead with the right hand at the end of the long lead. The very end.
And another question I have about the Parelli method -how does he instru

I’m riding him now, at a walk, to rehab an injury, but when the injury was new, I had to handwalk him, and aftier a few weeks, his energy level was off the charts and his behavior deteriorated. I’ve taught n myy horse to lead from the shoulder, as did the cowgirl who started him. I’d be dead or injured now if I let him lag behind me on a long lead. When I’m at his shoulder a) I have a clue if he’s going to “blow” and b) if he goes up or whirls, I’m close enough to not be kicked, not be struck, and can pull his head around and move into his shoulder to force him away from me. He is nor ordinarily ill-mAnnered, but after a couple of months of hand-walking, he was often close to losing it. (Oddly, he’s been quiet and well behaved under saddle, even tho we’re still just walking.)

Reading this entire thread, and watching the PP video clip,
NOW makes me wonder if my current gelding had ‘Parelli’ training :confused:
That would certainly explain the BAD manners on the lead, and on the ground,
and his apparent lack of understanding, when asked
to do things the ‘common sense’ way.
I was never a Parelli fan, altho, I also never really watched
much of his methods/videos, etc.
I remember when the Parelli’s first came ‘on scene’ and
so much of their training methods/rhetoric did not blend
with ANY of my 4-h training,
or formal pony club type horse handling, that I eventually dismissed it.
The ‘games’ never made any common sense to me,
and seemed dangerous.
The one friend who got involved in the Parelli system,
eventually lost total interest in horses altogether
bc her horses remained
(and actually, became exponentially) worse behaved :frowning:
When I would watch her handle them, with her Parelli certified instructor,
I had to bite my tongue - HARD! :no:

I guess, ideally, I should watch it, in order to see what NOT to do,
and how NOT TO GET HURT, handling horses on the ground.
Very enlightening :yes:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MudT3viHABA

How many catch phrases and slogans can you put in a two minute clip?
He drums in things like, “horses are natural born skeptics and claustrophobic” and people except that as fact with no thinking or discussion.
“Horses are natural born followers, so there looking for a leader, through Love, Language and Leadership”. Can we hear a collective, awwwwwe.
I want to puke.

And as for the halter; “thin to win”. As far as I am concerned, his “thin to win” halter is the halter world version of a twisted wire snaffle. That’s think to win too.
I thought it wasn’t about winning, but about love and language.

This is a carnival barker style, trade show demonstration technique and presentation he is so good at.
. And you keep talking, and talk fast, and repeat the same lines over and over and over. The product takes second place tot he spiel. This is what gives his followers have the deer in the headlight look.
It’s very effective.

This is what makes mind numb robots out of his followers. Like I said earlier, we used to call him Preacher Pat.

I prefer to lead with the horse’s head at my shoulder. I feel like if I am walking shoulder-to-shoulder with a horse, they are already way too far out in front of me and not within easy control.

I do not like the newer Linda-fied version of PP. I don’t buy into the whole Horsinality thing. Many years ago I did a bit of PP with Sonny. I still use some of the concepts for loading and leading.
For many situations I prefer the rope halter instead of a chain shank. However there are times a lip chain can work wonders especially to clip ears on a piggy horse, doctor a wound. Very rarely would I resort to that for leading.

I clicked through the PP video about leading since I am at work. I think many are viewing it in a vacuum. We don’t know where in the program progression this was selected from. If it is after the period when the horse should be well schooled in the 7 games it is far different than doing this with a horse fresh off the track yesterday.
If the 7 games have been done as he originally designed them then you can safely lead a horse with a long line. That horse would no sooner crowd you or bump you than he would crowd or bump the alpha horse NO MATTER WHAT. The handler in effect is truly alpha horse.

Sonny could be lead that way since he was proficient in the 7 games. He actually was being lead down a narrow hallway behind a handler and a horse along the corridor reached over and bit Sonny. Sonny jumped forward, then slammed on the brakes and never touched the person leading him. He took that second bite rather than run over that person.

PP basically advocates (or used to) a quick flight check every time you handle the horse. You don’t necessarily go through the whole 7 games but you ask them to lower their head to put on the halter (Game 1 yield to pressure), ask them to turn in a circle with you and away from you, you keep them out of your space, you stop unexpectedly and they should stop. Think showmanship type drill. You just make sure that they are paying attention to you and that you have go and stop still installed. It is a 30 second reminder session. He likened it to the pilot doesn’t just hop in the plane and fly away.
Do I necessarily think this is reasonable for a large boarding or training barn situation? Not really. But that isn’t really his target market. His target market is the back yard person that has no support and are trying to get their horse so they are enjoyable and safe to work around. In some ways the flight check can be viewed as the reminder that we train our horses EVERY time we handle them, good or bad they learn something even if we don’t intend to teach them anything.

I also tend to think that his methods and many NH methods when the handler is inexperienced and not working directly with the trainer are better suited for the quiet stock breeds. I think if you don’t have good natural timing or somebody working with you to get that timing then it can be easy to fry a very reactive horse. The inexperienced handler is more likely to wait too long before they make the correction and then the correction is made at much too high of a volume. The horse over-reacts, rinse, repeat and now you have a wired horse.

OP- It sounds like these particular horses are just badly trained and the owners think the do PP/NH. With one exception, all of the PP/NH horses I have dealt with I would be perfectly happy handing to my non-horse mother to lead, hand graze, load on a trailer. They are quiet and respectful.

The exception went to a local NH guy and came back absolutely phenominal but that quickly disappeared.

The owner is the type that basically doesn’t enforce the rules and asks, asks, asks, asks, asks, giggles, asks and lets the horse walk all over her. She has worked with a number of trainers that tell her she needs to be consistent and firm but it just is not her personality to do that.
She will tell you that she does PP or now it is CA but in reality she doesn’t use any discipline method, NH or otherwise. She just lets the horse do what he wants, when he wants and does not discipline him consistently until he finally annoys her enough. Then she is gets after him for a day or two. Her dogs are that way too.
Her horse is the type to take advantage of that void as he is a bit dominate. It isn’t the methods that have failed him. It is the application of those methods by his primary handler. She does not want to be the bad guy and just wants to have fun. Until he pushes her around enough to not be fun so she enforces the rules, then goes back to not enforcing the rules- rinse, repeat the cycle.

OP- If you do decide to horse sit this group again and can’t use the chain shank you are comfortable with then use the rope halter. Make sure it is put on properly and fairly tightly. Carry a carrot stick. Swing it back and forth in front of you. Stop walking. If that horse keeps walking he better run into that stick. Don’t turn to look at him during this. It is OOP look what you did you ran into that swinging stick. Turn towards him. He better move his feet and turn away from you. If not bring the stick up between you and him just behind his head. Do NOT swing it at him but use it to remind him to move away from you just by it being there. If he still does not move then tap him.
Basically for these horses you may need to establish the rules and boundaries the first time you handle them and keep it very narrow. Establish that you can move their feet. Don’t choke up on the lead too much but don’t give them too much either. (I would never hook a finger in a halter of any horse no matter how well behaved they are. All it takes is the horse raising and turning his head for a better look at something and you risk breaking that finger.)
FYI- generally you use a rope halter and lead similar to a chain shank. It is not constant pressure. Use little bumps that progress to bigger bumps if they ignore you.

[QUOTE=SonnysMom;8641381]

That horse would no sooner crowd you or bump you than he would crowd or bump the alpha horse NO MATTER WHAT. The handler in effect is truly alpha horse. .[/QUOTE]

Most of what you describe is true in most handling and I could let it go as different strokes for different folks.

It’s the Need to pronounce NO MATTER WHAT that sets my bullshit meter off along with the zen packaging.

I would never trust anyone who says No Matter What with horses or most anything with animals.

My extremely well-mannered and very professional acting OTTB (old war horse)went literally bonkers when boarded at a barn where the owner insisted in ‘training’ all her boarders in Parelli.

I didn’t know this when we had our interview. She never mentioned it was a requirement of boarding there and when she said she ‘trained’ horses in Parelli I told her not to touch my horse and that he was just fine for handling.

Well, she ‘trained’ him anyway and within days of being there he was completely unglued, unhappy, not eating well, not leading well and rearing and leaping backwards when even I went to get him in the pasture.

I moved him. He settled within hours and never exhibited that behavior again - unless he saw a long, thick white lead rope. Horrible experience for him. What irks me about a lot of Parelli followers is that they just will not accept that their way may NOT be the best way. The few I have met have been arrogant, insistent and plain rude about things. Puts a very bad light on any people that might follow the Parelli way and be good people.

right hand is about 3’ down the rope…left hand holds the excess. I never lead from the very end. :slight_smile:

FWIW: I put my horse on the longe this morning for a quick check (farrier was out and barn staff said she looked short). When I stopped her, I had her yield her haunches to me and then I backed her up from about 15’ away with no wiggling of the longe line or anything. Just a finger point. She backed and then stood. I brought her in a few steps and then asked her to go back again, which she politely did.

As I mentioned, I started down the NH path because of my first horse. He was a reactive sort, but his ground manners were amazing. He would spook, but he would never enter your space when doing so. I did have a period of having to hand walk him and he did some lovely airs above the ground…but it was all outside of my space and I was never in harms way. Now, he did run into someone else, but it was her fault for the situation she put him in.

[QUOTE=sascha;8639980]
Of course, it’s much, much safer to have them spook out of your field of vision so that you can get run over before you see it coming rather than see it coming and give a reminder that they are not to get in your space no matter how scary the object of spookiness seems to be. Silly me.

Reads an awful lot like you’ve drunk the Koolaid and flushed the common sense. lol[/QUOTE]

What a rude comment.

I doubt seriously a human can react quickly enough to head off a horse spooking into the human. Most of the time, IME, the human is dealing with the aftermath of the spook before s/he knows it’s started.

[QUOTE=Beck;8640229]Not at all true, unfortunately. As you go on to say: they do need to be taught to respect your space.

If you have the horse up beside you at arm’s length, you have a chance of dealing with any spook. If the horse is behind you, out of sight on a long lead, you have a good chance of being landed upon or knocked down. And by the time you have the lead gathered up the horse has the advantage of its weight in motion at the end of the rope. Physics.[/QUOTE]

That’s just not been my experience. I have seen people knocked down by walking beside the horse. One of my friend’s horses specializes in throwing a shoulder into her handler and sending them flying - not because she’s afraid, just because she wants to go somewhere the handler doesn’t. And I have seen people frightened when a horse blew past them from behind but missed them. Certainly if the human is silly enough to lock down on the rope as the horse blows past, that human is about to defy gravity. :slight_smile:

But I’m not saying NO MATTER WHAT:) . I imagine if I were leading a three year old TB to the post at Churchill Downs my method would not work so well. But I spend a lot of time teaching my horses to chill out and trust me and most importantly keep their big selves out of my space.:yes: So my method works fine for me.

I’m not saying that’s how the OP should handle these horses. My advice to her was to leave them alone if the owners won’t have them trained properly, because she’s liable to get hurt and then be unable to earn money and take care of her other clients.

[QUOTE=pAin’t_Misbehavin’;8641625]
What a rude comment.

I doubt seriously a human can react quickly enough to head off a horse spooking into the human. Most of the time, IME, the human is dealing with the aftermath of the spook before s/he knows it’s started.

That’s just not been my experience. I have seen people knocked down by walking beside the horse. One of my friend’s horses specializes in throwing a shoulder into her handler and sending them flying - not because she’s afraid, just because she wants to go somewhere the handler doesn’t. And I have seen people frightened when a horse blew past them from behind but missed them. Certainly if the human is silly enough to lock down on the rope as the horse blows past, that human is about to defy gravity. :slight_smile:

But I’m not saying NO MATTER WHAT:) . I imagine if I were leading a three year old TB to the post at Churchill Downs my method would not work so well. But I spend a lot of time teaching my horses to chill out and trust me and most importantly keep their big selves out of my space.:yes: So my method works fine for me.

I’m not saying that’s how the OP should handle these horses. My advice to her was to leave them alone if the owners won’t have them trained properly, because she’s liable to get hurt and then be unable to earn money and take care of her other clients.[/QUOTE]

Bolded mine. That is a rude horse that needs to be reeducated. It wouldn’t be safe no matter where you lead it from as it is just as likely to blow through one from behind to “go where it wants”.

[QUOTE=Pennywell Bay;8641690]
Bolded mine. That is a rude horse that needs to be reeducated. It wouldn’t be safe no matter where you lead it from as it is just as likely to blow through one from behind to “go where it wants”.[/QUOTE]

I agree about re-education.:yes: I started working with her a little bit as my friend is having some health problems.

She’s not trying to be rude, though - she’s just doing what she thinks she’s supposed to do. Her previous owners - little girls- allowed this behavior because they didn’t know how to stop it, and she got rewarded for it when she tossed her little handlers and got a mouthful of grass. Also, like many children’s horses, she’s been allowed to enter her handler’s space with impunity. So she also thinks that’s OK.

She’s a quick little study, though, and really does her best to figure out what I’m asking her to do and comply. :slight_smile: An enthusiastic and compliant attitude towards learning - not set in her ways at all, which sort of surprised me.

[QUOTE=roseymare;8639797]
That goes against physics. Leading a horse on the end of a lead is absolutely more dangerous especially for the horse. They have the leverage to get away from the handler more quickly. Have you ever lunged a horse with no give without a round pen?[/QUOTE]

you don’t understand physics very well. a loose lead takes away the horse’s power. a tight lead gives him leverage. same with walking a dog.

[QUOTE=sascha;8639849]
I would like to see any truly knowledgeable horseman who condones leading a horse from up tight under the chin. I’m thinking they’d be rare as hen’s teeth. It’s the lagging behind on a far too long rope that makes the Parelli nonsense dangerous. That horse spooks and bolts forward, you don’t have a chance because you’re not even able to read the dang horse’s body language in time to take action because it is BEHIND you out of your field of vision.[/QUOTE]

parelli’s method is actually to lead the horse right next to you on a loose lead, not out behind.

[QUOTE=aliceo;8654049]
you don’t understand physics very well. a loose lead takes away the horse’s power. a tight lead gives him leverage. same with walking a dog.[/QUOTE]

I disagree. They have more muscle in their neck than you have in your body. If they turn away from you holding the end of the rope it is too late and just because you are holding them shorter does not mean you are holding them tight. It can still be loose.

i don’t know where the “end of the rope” thing came in. parelli doesn’t have people hold the horse from the end of the rope for leading them. he and buck brannaman both have the human divide a 12 foot rope in half–the horse gets half and the human gets half.

you do a lot of groundwork with the horse to get them reliable being led like this. it’s not like you can just do it with a horse that doesn’t respect your space.

Because many many people who claim to use Parelli methods hold on to the very end of the leadrope. And hold with only one hand ad well.

[QUOTE=aliceo;8654049]
you don’t understand physics very well. a loose lead takes away the horse’s power. a tight lead gives him leverage. same with walking a dog.[/QUOTE]
I don’t understand this at all.