Are you being obtuse? Six years is nothing, and in fact, his offspring are competing now. http://www.horsetelex.com/horses/pedigree/393299 and http://www.horsetelex.com/horses/progeny/98115 How can you expect TBs to be at the top when the people breeding for the top don’t have very many TBs in their countries? (And probably eat them when they’re done racing.) You’re confusing correlation with causation. Many of my earlier examples were not decades old either. I get really tired of people who take what I write out of context and twist and falsify it.
I hate to break it to you but you have only a small chance of breeding a top show jumper with your warmblood mare. Can she jump 1.6m courses? Even if she COULD, even horses like that only throw a small percentage of top jumpers themselves. There are so many strong jumping lines in TBs that if you have a TB mare that can jump very well, your chances of getting a good jumper from her are probably as good as getting one from a warmblood mare.
MY POINT is that if American breeders used the talent that is available to them (although the catch is they’d have to look for it) and actually bred very many jumpers in a systematic fashion, there would be a lot of TBs and F1s at the top. But frankly, it doesn’t appear Americans aren’t going to breed many top jumpers no matter what they use. Not that many people are breeding for the jumper market, and if this board is any indication those that do swallow the warmblood marketing to the point that they are brainwashed. There is no doubting the talent and success of warmbloods, but the dissing of TBs… I don’t get it.
Ugh. Posts like yours always ruin the tone of threads like these. You think you are being logical but you are not.
I’m not a breeder but as a rider and spectator I love the sensitivity of TBs and I think horses with a lot of blood are just a lot more fun to watch.