TB kills the jump?

As said before, Holstein, way back, lamented the loss of TB outcross candidates with the advent of Northern Dancer. TB’s are used for refinement and speed and a generational weaving in the pedigrees. If lucky, you get one that won’t negate the jump. There are mentions of the following TB horses previously but please note, these models came before the advent of baby talent and speed, speed, speed. I’d like to know the thoughts of the WB breeders on these horses, why they succeeded to the extent they did, and would they welcome these few if still around today?

Since these TB’s have been successful in sport and approved by some WB registries, I thought it would be of interest to study the pedigrees. First, these are 1970’s and 80’s models. No Northern Dancer or Mr. Prospector here. You will find the cast of usual suspects in the background, Ksar, Fair Play, Hyperion (To Bay Ronald), Rock Sand, Man O’ War, My Babu, etc. Lines that in the past, used to cross for the production of sport horses and perhaps, close enough to the English lines and Dark Ronald lines that they still clicked with the WB base. Even so, we’re talking three horses.

http://www.pedigreequery.com/coconut+grove2

http://www.pedigreequery.com/mytens

http://www.pedigreequery.com/hand+in+glove

Omare posted a study on jumpers done using Selle Francais. The long croups would imply a correct SI placement and I think, placement of the stifle under the point-of-hip, that “triangle” in the hind end.

Of these three horses, did they have the correct hind end that I often don’t see in the TB anymore? I often see TB’s with goose rumps, a short pelvic bone, more upright femurs, and an SI placement quite behind the ideal. (And the very straight hind leg that can go with that) The overall impression of that is a “short” hind end, not in appropriate balance with the rest of the horse.

Does the steep, short croup matter when the emphasis is breeding for speed instead of sport?

And when I read an article about how this TB and that TB lowers their shoulder and runs close to the ground, is that the antithesis of what you’d want in a classic stayer or sport horse?

It appears that the late Coconut Grove was approved AHHA. I’m wondering if he could have been used in the Verband via frozen, of if he would have had to be approved by the Verband first?

Thanks in advance for any useful insight.

[QUOTE=Fourbeats;7623902]
Excuse me? As someone who has indeed been conversing privately with Reece on this topic, not to mention having 30 plus years in horses ( including breeding F1 crosses), I can promise you what I had to say sure as heck was worth reading. Who are you to determine the quality of my messages to him?

But, feel free to keep yacking and calling things you know nothing about as nothing more than nonsense.[/QUOTE]

Fourbeats…you are dealing with someone who has admitted to having little to no experience in anything equine. She obviously is about to come unglued as well. Don’t sweat it…

And thank you .

[QUOTE=Bayhawk;7624051]
I haven’t lambasted anyone for knowing less than me. Have you heard me tell someone that I know more than them ?

I don’t criticize those less fortunate than me because I don’t know who is less fortunate than me.

I haven’t disparaged anyone who has dis-agreed with me. They have a right to their opinion.

I will tell you this…If you don’t like my delivery. If my words are not sugary enough for you. If you don’t like my general opinions about things then by all means…NEVER read one of my posts again please !

You may be right about one thing though…I can be an acrimonious ass from time to time so how about you consider this to be one of those times and understand that I don’t give a rats ass what you think of me. Is that acrimonious enough for you ?

Hey…you’re entitled to your opinion , you stated it…and I just stated mine.[/QUOTE]

If you didn’t care - you wouldn’t have responded. Your disparaging comments are useless and derail the quality of every thread you participate in. Your delivery shows you lack tact and the care to structure your responses in a thoughtful and educational manner.

Instead of insulting someone for not knowing anything about your preferred breed (which you have done many times on this thread - I don’t even have to quote you) and instead of insulting anyone with an opinion not your own, you could state your piece calmly and maybe, just maybe, your ‘opponents’ in this thread would see your line of thought.

Just something to consider.

I agree with you that the TB was useful for a time, and that not all TBs are sport(jump) horses. I agree that the racing TB is not where many registries will find fresh infusion of blood. I agree there are many TBs out there not appropriate for UL candidacy. What I do not agree with is your #s - to fairly compare the success of a TB with the success of a WB, you need to exclude racing TBs and include only TBs purpose-bred for sport, like WBs are. Your comparison of all TBs against WBs would be like me comparing the success of WBs in combined driving - instead of including all WBs, a more telling % of success would be to focus on the harness horses bred for driving suitability. Then, when you compare those two numbers, you may find that the percentage of TBs that make it to ULs (that are not track-bred) may be more than the 0.02% that was mentioned earlier in this thread for WBs.

It is inaccurate to compile the #s of racing TBs produced and compare them to the #s of WBs produced - they are two entirely different sports.

[QUOTE=beowulf;7624090]
If you didn’t care - you wouldn’t have responded. Your disparaging comments are useless and derail the quality of every thread you participate in. Your delivery shows you lack tact and the care to structure your responses in a thoughtful and educational manner.

Instead of insulting someone for not knowing anything about your preferred breed (which you have done many times on this thread - I don’t even have to quote you) and instead of insulting anyone with an opinion not your own, you could state your piece calmly and maybe, just maybe, your ‘opponents’ in this thread would see your line of thought.

Just something to consider.

I agree with you that the TB was useful for a time, and that not all TBs are sport(jump) horses. I agree that the racing TB is not where many registries will find fresh infusion of blood. I agree there are many TBs out there not appropriate for UL candidacy. What I do not agree with is your #s - to fairly compare the success of a TB with the success of a WB, you need to exclude racing TBs and include only TBs purpose-bred for sport, like WBs are. Your comparison of all TBs against WBs would be like me comparing the success of WBs in combined driving - instead of including all WBs, a more telling % of success would be to focus on the harness horses bred for driving suitability. Then, when you compare those two numbers, you may find that the percentage of TBs that make it to ULs (that are not track-bred) may be more than the 0.02% that was mentioned earlier in this thread for WBs.

It is inaccurate to compile the #s of racing TBs produced and compare them to the #s of WBs produced - they are two entirely different sports.[/QUOTE]

You see this is where you are confused. I have never compared TB’s to WB’s in this thread and have made sure I didn’t. This is a TB kills jump thread. I have done it before to make a point…but not here.

I don’t have “opponents” nor any competition from the TB contingent. TB’s are no competition.

I adamently agree with the title of the thread…TB’s kill jump. I have seen it time and again. Most breeders in Europe have seen it time and again ,hence why TB Stallions currently get less than 1% of all warmblood mares in Europe.

I have stated over and over that their only use today in sporthorse breeding globally is in the generational production of the warmblood. This constantly proves true.

The only reason I even participate in this thread is to combat those that say they are so great. It is of my opinion that they are not great and about every stat proves it.

I didn’t compile the numbers to compare to WB’s. I compiled the numbers to discredit the TB jihadists here. 1.3 million foals born since 1978…average of 36,111 born each and every year for the last 36 years and there are only a few exceptions in top sport to show for it. TB enthusiasts can’t continue to tout how great they are with these astronomical numbers. These numbers have nothing to do with warmbloods…only the TB’s that continually are touted here.

You say it’s unfair to use these undisputed stats because the majority are bred for racing. I dis-agree because out of this ENORMOUS amount of foals being produced and with all this purported and supposed SPORTHOSE BLOOD lying behind them…there is basically nothing to show for it.

[QUOTE=Bayhawk;7624123]
You see this is where you are confused. I have never compared TB’s to WB’s in this thread and have made sure I didn’t. This is a TB kills jump thread. I have done it before to make a point…but not here.

I don’t have “opponents” nor any competition from the TB contingent. TB’s are no competition.

I adamently agree with the title of the thread…TB’s kill jump. I have seen it time and again. Most breeders in Europe have seen it time and again ,hence why TB Stallions currently get less than 1% of all warmblood mares in Europe.

I have stated over and over that their only use today in sporthorse breeding globally is in the generational production of the warmblood. This constantly proves true.

The only reason I even participate in this thread is to combat those that say they are so great. It is of my opinion that they are not great and about every stat proves it.

I didn’t compile the numbers to compare to WB’s. I compiled the numbers to discredit the TB jihadists here. 1.3 million foals born since 1978…average of 36,111 born each and every year for the last 36 years and there are only a few exceptions in top sport to show for it. TB enthusiasts can’t continue to tout how great they are with these astronomical numbers. These numbers have nothing to do with warmbloods…only the TB’s that continually are touted here.

You say it’s unfair to use these undisputed stats because the majority are bred for racing. I dis-agree because out of this ENORMOUS amount of foals being produced and with all this purported and supposed SPORTHOSE BLOOD lying behind them…there is basically nothing to show for it.[/QUOTE]
I think this is where our disagreement is. There is almost nothing to show for jumping TBs because you are focussing on the racing TB stats and not the jump/sportbred stats. The number of TBs for sport is a fraction of racehorses and wbs produced, which means statistically a much smaller percentage. I respect your opinion and agree with most of what you have said professionally about TBs- but disagree with the why.

IMHO/E, TBs kill the price tag, not the jump. No one is looking to TBs because they are hard to market. Which means that statistically, you will see less of them. It doesn’t mean they aren’t there – it just means currently, in this market and economy, they are under the radar.

We have been lamenting on this board for years the loss of the sporthorse lines in TB breeding and Viney, amongst others, has done years of research on the likely lines, now fast fading into the nether regions of the pedigrees.

If such lines HAD been procured and selectively bred, we would have a very different animal, capable of competing in the Olympic disciplines - one that might not be so speedy, but would have the feet and legs and mind. Race horse breeders do not put a priority on such things, preferring precocity
and speed.

I said before that perhaps the train has left the station - I hope not. Nobody wants to put the few generations in now that we have WB’s so far ahead in breeding.

Somebody should have thought to add Saddlebred to the mix too, years ago,
when those old style horses were the foundation, with their camped out stance. (partly joking, there).

Aah, heck, this has gone on too long…is there anything else to say?

[QUOTE=beowulf;7624130]
I think this is where our disagreement is. There is almost nothing to show for jumping TBs because you are focussing on the racing TB stats and not the jump/sportbred stats. The number of TBs for sport is a fraction of racehorses and wbs produced, which means statistically a much smaller percentage. I respect your opinion and agree with most of what you have said professionally about TBs- but disagree with the why.

IMHO/E, TBs kill the price tag, not the jump. No one is looking to TBs because they are hard to market. Which means that statistically, you will see less of them. It doesn’t mean they aren’t there – it just means currently, in this market and economy, they are under the radar.[/QUOTE]

Now see here is where I can relay some of my first hand experience to you.

The TB Stallions selected over the last many , many years do kill the jump. When you see them tested ,they can’t jump with the rest of the stallions and are asked to jump much lower jumps.

When you go around to the breeders and you jump the F-1 mares by these TB Stallions ,they don’t jump or move anywhere near like their mothers. The F-1 colt is bought back by the Verband for 2500 euro because the breeder only wants the filly for generational breeding. What happens to the 2500 euro colt ? Who knows. We usually don’t see them again because there is no market for them.

Now , to the stats. The ones I stated are not just racing stats. There is no separation. Jockey Club papers go to TB foals whether they were bred for racing or both parents jumped , did dressage or evented. They are all part of the 1.3 million since 1978 and they are all part of the 36,111 foals born each and every year for the last 36 years.

We agree that most don’t seek them out. We agree that they are hard to market because of it.

What we dis-agree on is your statement that TB’s “kill the pricetag and not the jump”. I would submit the reverse…the lack of jump has killed the price tag.

If the TB kills the jump so much, would there not be more generations needed between the TB sire or dam and a very good performing grandchild (earlier I gave quite a number of examples of those)? Only one generation between the TB and the very well performing 1.60 m jumper is next to nothing. With an ancestor with subpar ability one would think it would not be overcome so quickly.
http://www.horsetelex.nl/horses/pedigree/299180

There is still one question I would like to ask… Bayhawk, are you only a breeder, or do you also ride your horses?? I apologize for the question but I really don’t know you personally.

[QUOTE=beowulf;7624090]

It is inaccurate to compile the #s of racing TBs produced and compare them to the #s of WBs produced - they are two entirely different sports.[/QUOTE]

Wouldn’t a better comparison be AQHAs? An actual breed purpose-bred for something other than high-level FEI disciplines. There were some odd 60,000 of those registered in 2013 if I’m reading their stats right. How many of those will make it into the GP ring? I’d wager a statistically smaller percentage than TBs, who are also not being purpose bred for FEI disciplines. But if you started breeding them generationally for sport? That would change, just the way WBs are no longer big luggy brontosauruses of a carthorse; they were purpose bred for sport, and thus became sporty.

A better question than “Does TB kill the jump” is “Why aren’t we breeding TBs for sport?” But I suppose then American riders would have to learn to ride green horses and bring them along, rather than buying European castoffs.

Chiara 222; http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/467752 second in the WBFSH ranking for jumping.
Casall Ask http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/49609 24th in the WBFSH ranking for jumping.
Catwalk IV http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/1494268 34th in the WBFSH ranking for jumping.
Cristallo A LM http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/679816 63th in the WBFSH ranking for jumping.

These horses are having Sable Skinflint xx in their motherline, nobody talks about this TB. His direct offspring were not easy according to several breeders but the good quality’s of this TB are coming after some generations. This is the case with the most TB’s you use them to think in generations and not all colts are disasters; http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/139250

Except for Casal Ask who has Korenbleem xx in the motherline.

The same can be said from Clinton (by Corrado I) his direct offspring are not easy to work with, his son Cornet Obolensky was better but still not easy and his offspring are at the moment unbelieveble in jumping.

Yesterday evening I have visited friends who are breeders too. Their family bred pretty impressive horses and they said too we must always have the courage to use TB’s. In Holstein they really do believe they still need direct TB blood.

For the people who understand German and who wish to translate; http://www.holsteiner-jungzüchter.de/?id=306 Last year we had even a seminar about using TB’s in the Holsteiner breeding program!

I was joking a bit with that picture of Gambo because of course he was an Oldenburger and not a Holsteiner.
But let’s for example have a look at Heidelberg: http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=605461
He had 16.6% of Ethelbert: http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=85052
15.6% of Elegant http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=736992
12.5% of Wildfang: http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=566755
9.2% of Adjudant: http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=276161
9.2 % of Hannibal: http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=69404
8.6 % of Falb:http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=705080
8.6 % of Amurat: http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=510453
7.8 % of Cicero: http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=230237
7.4 % of Achill: http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=526526
6.6 % of Fregatte: http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=582120
6.3 % of Zauberer: http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=333779
6.1 % of Dampfschiff: http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=213914
6.1 % of Midas: http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=72943
Etc.
At this point it got to the Cleveland Bay “point”: http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=677982 and http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=366527 http://www.clevelandbay.com/about-cb-horses

Heidelberg is among others the grandsire of these horses (all with pictures):
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=337035
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=545130
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=718444
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=516536
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?d=faehnrich&x=18&y=14
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?d=falmo&x=38&y=12
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?d=albrant&x=36&y=9
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=258822
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=392162
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=114070
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=230634
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?d=fokus+I&x=16&y=6
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?d=fokus+II&x=22&y=7
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=361909
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=104367
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=337100
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=173551

Now we look for him again after having moved two generations further back in pedigrees (again with pictures):
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=259211
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=10512825
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=665397
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=233681
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=232953
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=259265
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=10216137
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=378275
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=10206466

What can be seen is that the heavy, old type of Holsteiner needed quite a bit of “blood” to get a lighter type of horse. They already had some light blood in their ancestry.

http://www.holsteiner-jungzüchter.de/?id=306

Die Holsteiner Zucht braucht wieder mehr Vollbluteinsatz.

Translation:
Holsteiner breeding again needs more use of TB.

A good example of a today’s young Holsteiner stallion:
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?d=casalito&x=23&y=10
XX/OX percentage: 57,81%
31.3% Landgraf: http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=680181
5.2% Tobias, most of it coming from this horse: http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=54007
http://holsteiner-verband.de/front_content.php?client=1&lang=1&idart=4740
http://holsteiner-verband.de/front_content.php?idcat=32

Caletto: http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/347 XX/OX percentage: 45,31%
Isidor: http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/486 XX/OX percentage: 42,38%
Lavall I: http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/17914 XX/OX percentage: 63,48%
Maltia: http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/25182 XX/OX percentage: 50,78%
Ladykiller: http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/1637550 XX/OX percentage: 100,00%
Warthburg; http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/267 XX/OX percentage: 27,93%
Viola: http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/550 XX/OX percentage: 51,76%
Mikado: http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/18381 XX/OX percentage: 54,69%
Irwana: http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/177570 XX/OX percentage: 75,39%

[QUOTE=Bachus;7624249]
Chiara 222; http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/467752 second in the WBFSH ranking for jumping.
Casall Ask http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/49609 24th in the WBFSH ranking for jumping.
Catwalk IV http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/1494268 34th in the WBFSH ranking for jumping.
Cristallo A LM http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/679816 63th in the WBFSH ranking for jumping.

These horses are having Sable Skinflint xx in their motherline, nobody talks about this TB. His direct offspring were not easy according to several breeders but the good quality’s of this TB are coming after some generations. This is the case with the most TB’s you use them to think in generations and not all colts are disasters; http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/139250

Except for Casal Ask who has Korenbleem xx in the motherline.

The same can be said from Clinton (by Corrado I) his direct offspring are not easy to work with, his son Cornet Obolensky was better but still not easy and his offspring are at the moment unbelieveble in jumping.

Yesterday evening I have visited friends who are breeders too. Their family bred pretty impressive horses and they said too we must always have the courage to use TB’s. In Holstein they really do believe they still need direct TB blood.

For the people who understand German and who wish to translate; http://www.holsteiner-jungzüchter.de/?id=306 Last year we had even a seminar about using TB’s in the Holsteiner breeding program![/QUOTE]
Very nice article, thank you for quoting:)
Exactly what I think too. I thought that people who ride horses with a lot of Blood are fans of them was an interesting statement. That’s how I feel too:) I love to ride horses with Blood. They are much more fun…
And I agree especially with Dr. Nissens Opinion

No one is arguing about the need for TB blood. The title of the thread is TB kills jump… not does a warmblood need TB blood.

[QUOTE=Bachus;7624249]
Chiara 222; http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/467752 second in the WBFSH ranking for jumping.
Casall Ask http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/49609 24th in the WBFSH ranking for jumping.
Catwalk IV http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/1494268 34th in the WBFSH ranking for jumping.
Cristallo A LM http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/679816 63th in the WBFSH ranking for jumping.

These horses are having Sable Skinflint xx in their motherline, nobody talks about this TB. His direct offspring were not easy according to several breeders but the good quality’s of this TB are coming after some generations. This is the case with the most TB’s you use them to think in generations and not all colts are disasters; http://www.horsetelex.nl//horses/pedigree/139250

Except for Casal Ask who has Korenbleem xx in the motherline.

The same can be said from Clinton (by Corrado I) his direct offspring are not easy to work with, his son Cornet Obolensky was better but still not easy and his offspring are at the moment unbelieveble in jumping.

Yesterday evening I have visited friends who are breeders too. Their family bred pretty impressive horses and they said too we must always have the courage to use TB’s. In Holstein they really do believe they still need direct TB blood.

For the people who understand German and who wish to translate; http://www.holsteiner-jungzüchter.de/?id=306 Last year we had even a seminar about using TB’s in the Holsteiner breeding program![/QUOTE]

I agree with everything you say here.

My best mare here is coming from Sable Skinflint xx also. Lavaletto / Acord II / Sable Skinflint xx from the stamm of Carlo.

Her sons are very easy but some of her daughters can be a little difficult early on but the time they are 3 -4 years old thy are super.

The one thing here that stands out is what you reported Otto said…“you must have courage” and use a TB Stallion. I agree totally with this but it is so hard for a breeder to do these days because they know what they are going to lose in the first generation and sometimes the 2nd and 3rd.

It is hard for them as well because when they decide to keep this filly…it is a long time commitment and not knowing if it will work or not. It takes courage indeed…

[QUOTE=Manni01;7624243]
There is still one question I would like to ask… Bayhawk, are you only a breeder, or do you also ride your horses?? I apologize for the question but I really don’t know you personally.[/QUOTE]

Your question is irrelevant to sporthorse breeding. Most of the best breeders in the world are not riders and the majority of your most knowledgeable folks on this BB re not riders.

A breeder can learn all they need to know about heir horse from the ground and with input from the rider.

[QUOTE=Fourbeats;7623902]
Excuse me? As someone who has indeed been conversing privately with Reece on this topic, not to mention having 30 plus years in horses ( including breeding F1 crosses), I can promise you what I had to say sure as heck was worth reading. Who are you to determine the quality of my messages to him?

But, feel free to keep yacking and calling things you know nothing about as nothing more than nonsense.[/QUOTE]

I could care a less about what you write to Reece Miller, or anything else you have to say.

[QUOTE=Catsdorule-sigh;7624069]
As said before, Holstein, way back, lamented the loss of TB outcross candidates with the advent of Northern Dancer. TB’s are used for refinement and speed and a generational weaving in the pedigrees. If lucky, you get one that won’t negate the jump. There are mentions of the following TB horses previously but please note, these models came before the advent of baby talent and speed, speed, speed. I’d like to know the thoughts of the WB breeders on these horses, why they succeeded to the extent they did, and would they welcome these few if still around today?

Since these TB’s have been successful in sport and approved by some WB registries, I thought it would be of interest to study the pedigrees. First, these are 1970’s and 80’s models. No Northern Dancer or Mr. Prospector here. You will find the cast of usual suspects in the background, Ksar, Fair Play, Hyperion (To Bay Ronald), Rock Sand, Man O’ War, My Babu, etc. Lines that in the past, used to cross for the production of sport horses and perhaps, close enough to the English lines and Dark Ronald lines that they still clicked with the WB base. Even so, we’re talking three horses.

http://www.pedigreequery.com/coconut+grove2

http://www.pedigreequery.com/mytens

http://www.pedigreequery.com/hand+in+glove

Omare posted a study on jumpers done using Selle Francais. The long croups would imply a correct SI placement and I think, placement of the stifle under the point-of-hip, that “triangle” in the hind end.

Of these three horses, did they have the correct hind end that I often don’t see in the TB anymore? I often see TB’s with goose rumps, a short pelvic bone, more upright femurs, and an SI placement quite behind the ideal. (And the very straight hind leg that can go with that) The overall impression of that is a “short” hind end, not in appropriate balance with the rest of the horse.

Does the steep, short croup matter when the emphasis is breeding for speed instead of sport?

And when I read an article about how this TB and that TB lowers their shoulder and runs close to the ground, is that the antithesis of what you’d want in a classic stayer or sport horse?

It appears that the late Coconut Grove was approved AHHA. I’m wondering if he could have been used in the Verband via frozen, of if he would have had to be approved by the Verband first?

Thanks in advance for any useful insight.[/QUOTE]

Yeats was a champion stayer and his grandsire was Northern Dancer. http://www.pedigreequery.com/yeats2

Thomas Edison is or was until very recently a GP jumper under Charlie Jayne and is a Northern Dancer descendent. http://www.allbreedpedigree.com/thomas+edison
http://www.sporthorse-data.com/d?i=10618810
http://www.pedigreequery.com/raejan+runner

Arkansas is a current GP jumper under Hillary Simpson. http://www.pedigreequery.com/arkansas17

http://www.roodandriddle.com/news/roodriddleannouncesthoroughbredsporthorsedivisionalawardwinners.html

Both TE and Arkansas are ex racehorses.

The sports type isn’t dead, far from it, even “in spite of” Northern Dancer’s influence.