He absolutely would have the right to raise his rates, but would need to give her the stipulated notice, usually 30 days.
But it still seems bizarre and way out of line for MB to call 911 and say “I want them [officers] here NOW” to the dispatcher because a client would not sign a document. Seems she had every right to decline to agree, in writing, to higher rates.
If she refused to agree to higher rates on July 31, he could tell her to leave by Sept 1, but not by Aug 1.
We all agree that it is not OK to shoot someone if they don’t agree to higher rates. But what I am asking about is the bizarreness of calling 911 if your client refuses to sign a document. That sounds like it’s almost in the same category of calling 911 if McDonalds gets your takeout order wrong.
Just not an appropriate reason to call 911. Unless you resort to calling the cops to intimidate someone into signing.
I am well off financially (no, no trust fund or inherited money). In dealing with trainers, who generally are not as financially secure as I am, for years I tried to be the perfect client who didn’t quibble about possible “gray areas” on the invoice, but pretty soon the gray areas become moderate but obvious padding. If, in an attempt to be generous, and not be accused of “nickel and diming” someone, you keep paying, with a pleasant expression on your face, it ends with the trainer just looking at you as a walking checking account to be exploited.
Since LK apparently had plenty of money, and it was family money as opposed to self earned money, I find it extremely plausible that MOST trainers would be very sorely tempted to drain as much money from her as possible, and not feel any qualms about it.
So, aside from LK posting here saying MB was attempting to force agreement to higher fees, I find it extremely plausible that he would attempt to do so. It’s pretty much what trainers fo.