I don’t think he’s pretending. I think he honestly doesn’t know the difference. He makes a horse shuffle and thinks it’s a piaffe. Presto! That’s now a GP horse.
He clearly doesn’t understand that riding through the pattern of a Third Level test doesn’t automatically make that horse a Third Level horse without the appropriate level of strength, impulsion, balance, suppleness, self-carriage, etc. The poor horse’s upside down muscling speaks volumes about how incorrectly she was being ridden.
He’s far from alone though. Lots of people seem to think capable of a flying change = a Third Level horse. When I was a teenager living in the back of beyond with no access to dressage training or information, none of us even knew what “on the bit” was, let alone how to achieve it. We still went to small local dressage shows and rode our horses exactly the same way in every test, just with smaller circles and harder movements as we moved up the levels (albeit not very far up lol). Anyone who cracked 60 was considered amazing. 40’s weren’t unusual.
When I look back now at the judges we brought in back then, I realize what absolute saints they were to be encouraging while still scoring us fairly. Several of them are now senior and FEI level judges.
The difference is that for most people at least, when they know better, they do better. Nick should know better. He has certainly been told how and why he needs to improve, and has had ample opportunity to check his ego at the door and take lessons with someone who could actually turn him into a half decent rider. But his mantra (and I quote verbatim) is: “I don’t take lessons, I teach them.”