The "NO REINSTATEMENT" thread.

I’ll give Harry a HALLELJUIA!!! PAISE IT BE!!
HARRY ROCKS … Proud memeber of the Motley Crew

THESE ARE NOT SNIDE COMMEMNTS I WANT FACTS AND CORRECT ONES AT THAT! I JUST POSTED ON THE OTHER “LITTLE PEOPLE” THE INFOR LIKE SNOWBIRD SUGGESTED I GET AND HOW IS IT THAT IT DOESN’T MATCH WHAT YOUR ACCUSATIONS ARE! LEGATO, ARISTICRAT AND WHO ACTUALLY OWNS ACRES WILD FARM. YOU ALL ARE MAKING FOOLS OUT OF ALL OF US BY GETTING US HIPED UP ABOUT POOR AND INCORRECT JOURNALISM
GIVE STRAIGHT FACTS OR DON’T GIVE THEM AT ALL AND THE PEOPLE AND INNOCENT JUNIORS THAT HAVE TO READ YOUR FALSE ACCUSATIONS ABOUT THEM MIGHT GET PRETTY UPSET ABOUT ALL OF THIS. YOUR PUTTING FEAR IN THEM YES AS I HAVE STATED BEFORE. THERE IS FREEDOM OF SPEECH BUT WHEN IT IS FALSE AND CAUSES HARM TO PEOPLE. IT COULD GET QUITE LEGAL,
ONCE AGAIN I AM ASKING FOR THE FACTS TO HELP BUT YOU ALL SEEM TO BE ON A WITCH HUNT AGAINST ONE A GUY WHO HAS BEEN ELIGILBE FOR ALMOST 2 YEARS TO RE APPLY AND HAS NOT. COME APRIL YOU ALL JUST MIGHT BE LOOKING BAD.
I AM USING MY CAPS BECAUSE THE REGULAR TYPE DOESN’T SEEM TO SINK INTO YOUR HEADS
BY THE WAY I DO HAVE A JOB AND I LIKE TO PUT MY MONEY WHERE MY MOUTH IS!!!

ONCE AGAIN GIVE ME FACTS!

Originally posted by Ghazzu:

Once more, since many of you supporters of PV seem to keep missing this point:

Some of us feel that the action of ordering a horse electrocuted for money is a wee bit more serious than a “mistake”.

A “mistake” is something like entering a second year horse in the first year greens.

Killing a horse for reasons of misplaced pride is more on the order of “heinous act”.

Amen.
And it should never be forgotten, swept under the rug or dismissively labeled “a mistake.”

When these discussions pop up I am always horrified at the supporters of these people who lobby for them to go about their business in the horse world as if nothing had ever happened.
I am relieved to hear the outrage of many who NEVER want to see ANY of these people within rock throwing distance of a horse again.

When that outrage goes away…I think I will go to NASCAR…for a classier crowd.

Originally posted by sarabeck:
Tis a question for Snowbird or war Admiral you both seem well informed about the facts

alos please don’t beat up on me when i ask very logical questions i am here to help you.

what is the name of valliere’s business and who are the people he is and has employed who would be in possible violation of the rules. shouldn’t we write a letter to the usef and give them these names. I would be willing to write the letter.

there was a long thread recently about the rider who was going to work for PV - 'twas here on H/J forum - I would assume that said rider was banking on PV applying for and being granted reinstatement as otherwise said rider would violate the newly passed rules if he tried to enter shows on horses owned by, trained by,…PV

I also have the US Attorney’s office press release announcing Heinsohn’s indictment, and it deals only with the killing of his horse Pet Of The Year. So, it appears that he wasn’t indicted for Jatomic Streaker, and thus the more vague wording about it.

He did plead guilty to one count of making false statements.

You cannot compare the no reinstatement movement to a jumper rider crashing… I understand the movement, you guys have great motives and I think your persistance is admirable. But this series isn’t the place for negativity. Let it go…

By all means Sheila then go weave a basket; we don’t want you to be stressed.

she did loose her vet license, and evidently has been trying to get it back. I did hear a few years ago that there was a group of people who either felt she deserved help or where trying to help her in petitioning for it back. The fact they felt sorry for her as if she were an innocent wronged, was revolting.

If a Doctor turned a blind eye to murder and made a profit out of it, people would be horrifed without question. She did the same, a Vet takes an oath to protect animals in need not murder them for profit.

The gossip, about her in court was that she was pregnant and Chuck married her in a ploy to avoid jail time. I think Radio might be right in assuming she never went to jail and never was suspended. Like I said if she was suspended it was only for a few years.

Originally posted by Linus:
I think it’s a good point that PV didn’t kill other people’s horses, without their consent, so I find Renn/aissance’s post (however well-written) completely off base.

Let me put my twist, as a breeder, on Renn’s post then…

But imagine that this horse was your horse. <span class=“ev_code_BLUE”>insert: a horse that I bred</span> Maybe he wasn’t ever going to be what you and your trainer had hoped he would be- maybe he never would have succeeded over the bigger fences. But this was a good horse, and a horse that you love. <span class=“ev_code_BLUE”>and maybe a horse that I waited for 11 months for, delivered in the wee hours of the morning, and nurtured. Raised to be a good citizen, and then sold him to what I thought was a SUPER home with a TOP professional believing he would have a great life.</span>You arrive at the show one day to find that he’s dead, and you’re heartbroken. Your horse, the one that you love, your baby, is dead. Maybe you watch him being dragged away- or maybe you couldn’t bear to watch. But then you find out that your trainer, whom you admire, killed him.

This is a person that should not only just barely be squeaking by on any rules with some VERY good grease, but as an icon, he should be at a very high standard.

The best??? Not in my opinion. I consider him one of the worst. Someone with less talent is a much better trainer than anyone that at ANYTIME in their life, would be willing to consider killing a horse for financial gain, or status.

What if a family member took over? I saw wording for a companion or spouse, would that include children?

Great idea please make it red with white trim so I can use it at the shows to sell the red and white bracelets.

Originally posted by xegeba:
<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><div class=“ip-ubbcode-quote-title”>quote:</div><div class=“ip-ubbcode-quote-content”>And I’m against what PV et al did to their horses. This thread, however, is about No Reinstatement for horse killers" (who defrauded insurance companies)

and I believe that whether you defauded your insurance company or decided that you no longer WANTED to feed your lame , useless horse( and then send it off to the SH)… Both scenarios make you a horsekiller. You probably A) shouldn’t own a horse B)Should not be able to apply for membership in any Association having to do with horses. </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

Therefore, by your own logic, PV should NOT be reinstated to USEF.

I knew you’d come around xegeba…

Seb

Considering how much work I’m having to do WITHOUT Paul participating here, I think I can safely say that it wouldn’t work and would never happen. Unfortunately there are a group of people who participate here who are extremely immature and have been incredibly out of line, both on and off the BB.

Not gonna happen.

Originally posted by Erin:
there are a million and one ways for it to “belong” to Paul and still legally show. ?

How many ways can a horse “belong” to someone and not really belong to them?

I hadn’t responded on any of these crazy threads - but this was surely one of the most ridiculous things I have read all along. Are they different? Hell yes! In case you need a reminder, abortion is legal in this country. Murdering a horse for insurance fraud is not. And that is only the beginning of the differences. Don’t even go there, “big dawg” - think about what you are actually saying. I sincerely think that few anywhere would value a horse’s life above a human’s - but that is not even what we’re talking about.

My response is not about the PV issue at all - your comment just struck me as absolutely insane.

My friend xegeba; I am a people person and I like people and I like to know all kinds of people even you could be interesting. Life is an adventure but that doesn’t mean you close your eyes when you know something is a no-no!

Probably why no one does any of their dirty deeds where I can see them. Can you imagine I’ve never been invited to a party where people were doing drugs. Do you suppose that why? Never been invited to a sex orgy either. I feel as if there’s a whole part of life I missed.

I promised myself i wouldn’t reply to your crap anymore, but this just made me laugh out loud…Big Dawg who are you to criticize someone for getting personal…Wasn’t it you making the “daddy’s money” and “public school” comments???

With the exception of this case I believe most are suspended for a specific term and then automatically reinstated.

Jane Clark to her credit when she was President made sure that these crimes because they were so heinous in terms of horse abuse and affected the industry as a whole so negatively made sure this time the Suspension was serious and not necessarily open to Reinstatement

I would guess the Sidelines article had more influence on any discussion. I have mailed some to Florida and California. About 150 have been sent by me.

BUY NOW! Bracelets Available to support No-Reinstatement

As a member of that committee, an opinion weighs heavily with general membership.

As a member of that committee, I personally concern myself with issues and conditions that currently affect horse welfare.