I’ve really tried to hold off commenting on this thread because I’ve commented on similar ones before, but, sorry, Chandra, I was a pro and on the circuit at the time all of this was going on and I heard firsthand these guys talk and joke about what they were doing. It was horrifying standing at the in-gate or being at a bar and hearing them talk about setting up deals to kill horses. PV might have been “sorry” but it was the sorry of a thief who wasn’t sorry that he stole, but was very, very sorry he got caught.
None of these guys had the least bit of remorse for killing the horses. They only were upset they got caught for it. For them, it was just business. A horse was a problem, a client was thinking about leaving. The horse dies, no more problem. You find the client a new horse, make another commission, take the new horse in on full training. Bada bing, bada boom.
Once the tax laws changed in 1987, these guys had to find an alternative to the donate scam. And, killing the horses was more efficient and easier. It was a business move. That cold-blooded.
PV may seem to some to be very sincere, but ask yourself if you would trust one of your horses in his hands, particularly if that horse turned out to be less than stellar. Would you trust a man with a history of killing problem horses with your horse? Paul got caught for one, so maybe. But what about Barney? Where should the line on the number of horses killed be drawn where you would say, oops, maybe I shouldn’t send my horse to that trainer? Maybe it’s kind of like saying, gee, do I want my child taught by someone convicted of being a sexual predator, after all, he was only caught for one offense.
Someone said earlier that reinstatement is not about these people as individuals, it’s about what is best for the industry and that’s true. it’s time to just say no.