<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by War Admiral:
<BLOCKQUOTE class=“ip-ubbcode-quote”><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> I certainly would not expect or want my vet to make a treatment plan based on what is “legal for showing” in the eyes of the USEF.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Hmmmm… Then I fully expect to eventually see somebody’s name on a suspension list at a theatre or drive-in near you. 
Seriously folks - you GOTTA check with your vet if you even think a horse s/he is treating might be ready to show. If I’ve had a vet call for a minor injury (to which my TB is preternaturally prone) and I’m a month out from a rated show, you bet I’m going to ask the vet what s/he is using and how far out that will test. It’s only prudent nowadays.
Thoroughbreds! Everything else is just a horse. :-)<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Wow, War Admiral, good job taking one paragraph out of a whole post, quoting it out of context and then implying that I would end up on the suspension list. At least that is how I read your comment.
I don’t know whether to be outraged, baffled or strangely amused. I guess I will settle for baffled because, really, my mind is boggling right now.
Care to clarify your remark? Was it pointed at me? Because my horses could show under the zero tolerance rules. Okay, the 11 year old gets Nimble as a preventative joint supplement but the other horse gets nothing. If (knocks wood furiously to stave off the horsie injury gods) one of them required treatment the last thought in my mind would be if my vet could figure out a treatment that would not result in a positive test. I would get a list of the medications and then contact the USEF with them. That is the relatively definitive answer. Notice the word relatively.
I really, really doubt that many vets would give you a time frame on drug clearance (talk about the liability if a trace of a prohibited substance would be detected). I would hope that the vet would refer you to the D&M committee (witness the fact that Reserpine went from being detectable two weeks out to, what, 45 days out?). And, you know what, the D&M committee is only going to give you guidelines. The only, definitive way to tell that your horse is clear of a prohibited substance or is within the allowable therapeutic levels is to have the blood tested by the USEF’s lab.
Hmmmm. That might not be a bad idea. Make the screening tests available at a profit to the USEF. If it costs $350 to run the tests then have them charge $500. Might be a good service to offer. I’d love to have access to their labs for a prepurchase examination.
Nina