I’ve just spent a good bit of time scanning the USEF breeder rankings for dressage that STF so kindly linked for us. Was not able to go below horses with twenty points, but that seems a fair number for success.
Most of the points were in levels below PSG. Now if what I’ve learned on CoTH is true, there are talented horses in almost all breeds and mixes of breeds who can do dressage up to fourth level. The big gap is between fourth level and PSG.
I counted five American bred horses with GP points from performance. They were all warmbloods. I should have made a list, but didn’t. I also counted about ten or fewer with Intermediate performance points. There weren’t many more with PSG points.
The huge majority of horses with more than twenty points were in the lower levels or young riders or A/A. I’d say more were in training and first level than anywhere else. And the vast majority of breeders had only one horse with points.
What I do not understand from the ranking is how so many horses who are listed as registered have unknown dams or damsires. There were also a lot of horses that didn’t claim registries, and a lot that didn’t list their registry numbers.
Is that a USEF recording problem?
Seems to me that Pwynn is right on when she talks about vanity buyers, because the vast majority of WB dressage horses, no matter how well bred, aren’t actually getting any higher up the levels than the Morgans or Arabians or TBs or Friesians or grade horses.