We just were saying that the end of year points are controlled 95% by very well bred WB horses.
And 99% by people who can afford to do what it takes to earn those points. You do accept the high correlation between WB ownership (especially in dressage–and probably in other sports at the upper levels) and income, yes?
There’s a thread over on the H-J BB right now about cheap horses who went on to do great things. It reminds me how we’ll never be able to parcel out the financial state of the owner/rider from the horse’s success, especially in dressage. People who can’t afford that expensive “ideal” dressage horse may very well have an “off-breed” horse that could do just as well, but can’t SHOW ANYONE THAT.
It’s, unfortunately, that one trait about horse “sports” that water-down the “sport” aspect, philosophically speaking…alas. We’ll just never know who is really “the best” in the same way track and field or other, less expensive, sports can. The WB type is the ideal, for historical reasons as well as physical ones, but on any given day, what horse is “the best” most definitely need NOT be a WB because in its ideal form, dressage is about more than just movement and type. (Thank goodness.)
Was it Rembrandt or Bonfire who looked and moved like a Saddlebred? And what of Rusty’s movement compared to, say, that incredible near-black mare everyone is awed about right now (name begins with a “W” I think). Proof that even at the highest of levels, it about a lot more than we’re implying here.