Updated barisone lawsuit 10/29/21 post 851

[MHM]

@MorganSercu

It may be that the video would violate CotH rules.

Then it would be easy to just post a link to it instead of the video itself.

[Equkelly]

How about we don’t all badger her into releasing a video from her private facebook? Can we just know that there are two conflicting accounts of what happened in the stupid video and that neither really change anything?

[Angela_Freda]

All I know is, I’m for sure not checking her Facebook page.
I mean, posting here is considered wrong, so that seems worse…

[MorganSercu]

I guess so. I haven’t seen it. I don’t particularly want to possibly view two grown adults in their late-30’s/early-40’s following someone around a store and making crude comments about a stranger. Particularly a YOUNG stranger who may also be a minor.

[BrendaJane]

LOL, Lala is putting out the dare.
But thank you for playing.

[eggbutt]

@Equkelly

How about we don’t all badger her into releasing a video from her private facebook? Can we just know that there are two conflicting accounts of what happened in the stupid video and that neither really change anything?

“Stupid video”? Probably not to the victim of the video. Here’s LK’s chance to prove @IdahoRider of lying but she won’t do it because it proves IdahoRider of being correct.

I suspect 48 Hours has seen it and they may comment on it. Sad really.

[MHM]

@Equkelly

How about we don’t all badger her into releasing a video from her private facebook? Can we just know that there are two conflicting accounts…?

She posted (#2972) that the video is still there and to go find it. That certainly sounds like an open invitation to anyone who is interested.

If there are two conflicting accounts of the video, an extremely simple way to see which account is accurate is to watch the video.

[La-LaPopRider]

@MorganSercu

following someone around a store and making crude comments about a stranger.

Wrong. Strangers making comments about crude behavior. Get it right. Unless going around a store where there ARE minors and purposely flashing shoppers doesn’t equal “crude behavior,” in your book. Even so, the post was meant as a shopping “blooper.” Nobody’s face was filmed- or any other body parts. With the exception of the back of two people’s heads. There was zero “making fun of clothing.” If you can provide evidence the post was anything other than what I’ve just described (for the third time) - be my guest. This will be the LAST time I reply re my Fb post. Deal with it.

[smoofox]

@Angela_Freda

But yes, she never should have read or posted here. For her own good.
As her friend, encourage her to stop, maybe.

Many of us encouraged LK not to post and rant and rage many times… for all the good that did. How on earth can carrying on like that (and many of those posts were waaaaaaaay Out There) help her case? Seeing as many of them were deleted or edited after the fact, it seemed that others were thinking the same thing.

@Equkelly

So which is it? She should prove herself here to everybody on coth or she should stay away from coth for her mental health and for the pending trial?

Exaggeration.

@Equkelly

I’m not saying they are take a second imagine that possibility and then imagine how pissed off you’d be if an entire internet BB spent this much energy spreading the bullshit.

More exaggeration/embellishment. There are only a few posters in assorted Barisone threads who have gotten into it with LK repeatedly - but I know it is much more dramatic to claim it is an entire internet BB… or everybody on COTH… and ignore the facts. All but a very few in these threads simply want to discuss, sort through the events and try to keep up with what is going on. And because it seems that it needs to be repeated for those in the back, that does not mean we are fangirls of MB or are LK haters or whatever other obsessive, phony accusation gets dragged out and flung up against the wall.

@Equkelly

I’m not saying who’s version is right or wrong but take literally a minute, and think about what IF @La-LaPopRider version is accurate and @IdahoRider either misunderstood intentionally or unintentionally and spread just that one rumor about her on here. If that was you, wouldn’t that be extremely upsetting? Wouldn’t you be pissed and want to tell your version?

If you have skimmed many of these threads - some of which got nuked because they got… well, let’s call it “interesting”… there have been many versions of the events presented here - including contradictions (and edits) by LK. #shrug

In answer to your questions… 1) A bit. 2) No, because I would be waiting for the trial for everything to be sorted out and made clear - and not getting antagonistic on a small thread on a BB and maybe presenting myself in a less than desirable light. And hopefully, I would have those who cared about me advising me along those lines.

[MHM]

@La-LaPopRider

@MorganSercu

following someone around a store and making crude comments about a stranger.

Wrong. Strangers making comments about crude behavior. Get it right. Unless going around a store where there ARE minors and purposely flashing shoppers doesn’t equal “crude behavior,” in your book. Even so, the post was meant as a shopping “blooper.” Nobody’s face was filmed- or any other body parts. With the exception of the back of two people’s heads. There was zero “making fun of clothing.” If you can provide evidence the post was anything other than what I’ve just described (for the third time) - be my guest. This will be the LAST time I reply re my Fb post. Deal with it.

Again, it seems like it would be much faster and simpler to just post the video or a link to it if that description is accurate.

[Inigo-montoya]

Why does anyone care about the stupid video? In my opinion LK should not have responded to IdahoRider who is among the most useless posters here. The FB post was merely a shopping blooper…as I see LK has just described it. That should be worth 1000 more posts here. Get ready for post #4000…MHM.

Maybe because the topic of this thread “updated Barisone lawsuit” didn’t work out so well for the haters and they’re obsession with victim blaming, police blaming…whatever!

Actually, shouldn’t this thread be closed until you get bored (like tomorrow) and open a new one since this topic is currently moot?

[MHM]

[eggbutt]

I’ll put hard earned cash on the table that it will be appealed.

[eggbutt]

Nice to see you back by the way.

[eggbutt]

@Inigo-montoya

Why does anyone care about the stupid video? In my opinion LK should not have responded

Bingo! Had she not made her snarky, belligerent post, we all would have moved on. Ya’ll like the “prove it” comment until it is turned on you. She opened the door to the back and forth. Honestly, most of us don’t go near her FB page but just like a letter, things get passed around.

[trubandloki]

@Equkelly, I do believe the moderation staff asked us (general us) to cut down on the swearing. I am not sure if you think this did not apply to you or that you missed that request, but you might want to go back and edit your swearing so mod1 does not have to do it for you.

[La-LaPopRider]

@eggbutt

Here’s LK’s chance to prove @IdahoRider of lying but she won’t do it because

Slade : Ms Kanarek doesn’t want it. SHe doesn’t need to labeled: “Still worthy of being a ‘Baird (WoMan).’” What the hell is that? What is your motto here? “Boys, inform on your classmates, save your hide” – anything short of that we’re gonna burn you at the stake? Well, gentlemen, when the sh** hits the fan some guys run and some guys stay. Here’s LK facing the fire; and there’s cothers hidin’ in big Daddy’s pocket. And what are you doin’? You’re gonna reward (anonymous) Cothers and (try to) destroy LK.”

Trask : Are you finished, Mr. Slade?

Slade :No, I’m just gettin’ warmed up.”

[MHM]

@La-LaPopRider

@eggbutt

Here’s LK’s chance to prove @IdahoRider of lying but she won’t do it because

Slade : Ms Kanarek doesn’t want it. SHe doesn’t need to labeled: “Still worthy of being a ‘Baird (WoMan).’” What the hell is that? What is your motto here? “Boys, inform on your classmates, save your hide” – anything short of that we’re gonna burn you at the stake? Well, gentlemen, when the sh** hits the fan some guys run and some guys stay. Here’s LK facing the fire; and there’s cothers hidin’ in big Daddy’s pocket. And what are you doin’? You’re gonna reward (anonymous) Cothers and (try to) destroy LK.”

Trask : Are you finished, Mr. Slade?

Slade :No, I’m just gettin’ warmed up.”

.

[Knights_Mom]

@La-LaPopRider

@eggbutt

Here’s LK’s chance to prove @IdahoRider of lying but she won’t do it because

Slade : Ms Kanarek doesn’t want it. SHe doesn’t need to labeled: “Still worthy of being a ‘Baird (WoMan).’” What the hell is that? What is your motto here? “Boys, inform on your classmates, save your hide” – anything short of that we’re gonna burn you at the stake? Well, gentlemen, when the sh** hits the fan some guys run and some guys stay. Here’s LK facing the fire; and there’s cothers hidin’ in big Daddy’s pocket. And what are you doin’? You’re gonna reward (anonymous) Cothers and (try to) destroy LK.”

Trask : Are you finished, Mr. Slade?

Slade :No, I’m just gettin’ warmed up.”

Trying to destroy?

Yikes!

[Equkelly]

@eggbutt

Bingo! Had she not made her snarky, belligerent post, we all would have moved on.

OK but can you for just a minute, see why that might be tempting for her? I’m serious, I’m not trying to fight with you eggbutt. Let’s just pretend for a minute that, in her mind, most of what is being said about her really is either untrue, misleading, or an exaggeration. Could you see how that could possibly make somebody belligerent and snarky?

I’ve seen most of you get belligerent and snarky on coth at one point or another when you’re misunderstood. Is it possible this is just an extreme 3 year long, thousands of posts, version of that same phenomenon?

I’m not asking how likely it is. Don’t you think that’s a small tiny possibility for what’s really going on here?