[QUOTE=Kelly G;2234076]
They’re red duns! I’d been told they were dilute [buckskin, I guess] by someone else, who I can only assume [like me before I got “wiser”, just yesterday :D] thought dun and buckskin were the same [ie.dilute], but, no, they’re definitively red duns [she says cleverly with her newly found wisdom :lol:]. 
Kelly.[/QUOTE]
I have just looked at both pedigrees with a fine toothcombe and can’t honestly see where “DUN” could have come from - you look at the source of the dilute and both have CLEAR Palomino “sources”
I have seen a lot of offspring by both and I have never EVER seen a dun. Palomino (out of cream dilute mares) YES - Buckskin (out of cream dilute mares) YES
No dun. Does not mean there aren’t any. I haven’t seen them though.
I am absolutely intrigued now and fascinated. If you can arrange some hair to be sent to me I will have it tested at my cost (I am in Germany, postage will be minimal, and I have connections to the lab so it won’t cost me much at all)
What do you think???
Edited to add:
I have just looked up about 70 offspring by both. IF they are dun I would have to expect 50 % of all their foals to be dun. I found quite a few which were registered as Palomino and buckskin, all but two (buckskins, full siblings, both out of the same “black” mare) every single Palomino or buckskin was out of a clearly cream dilute mare (from a proven cream dilute ie Buckskin/Palomino line) The rest were “normal” non dilute colours.
AGAIN - I am not saying you are wrong. It just intrigues me so it would be nice to be able to know for sure