You’ve made assumptions about posters’ politics. And their gender biases/misogyny. Which are patently wrong for at least some of the posters you’re trying to vilify. Consider for a moment that your assumptions about other posters’ personal beliefs/intuitions about guilt in this case might also be off base in at least some cases. Being curious about what happened does not entail a belief that the outcome was determined entirely by the woman’s actions, or that MB’s actions were justifiable, or in any way acceptable. Adjust your resolution and you’ll see that when you’re not looking for black and white guilt and innocence, it’s possible to entertain a theory without committing to a position about any individual’s responsibility. And that it’s possible to wonder about the things we don’t know while waiting for the justice system to do the hard work of determining what happened and where the responsibility lies.
Casting these kinds of aspersions about the motives, beliefs, political views, and values of other posters isn’t really more noble than asking questions about the actions, motives, and public personae of the individuals involved in the incident under discussion.