There are so many things that many of these posts and other internet comments refer to as if they were fact, but the truth is that there seems to be very little factual information in the public domain.
-
We don’t know how the gun got there or who it belonged to. All the gun-color speculation is meaningless.
-
We don’t know exactly what happened. Just what the police saw when they got there, after it was done.
-
We don’t even know the exact circumstances of LK’s shooting. "MB shot her … " well, that’s circumstantial at this point.
That’s what he’s accused of and arrested for, but it will be a long road to work out exactly what account of the shooting each side will present. Just because the initial circumstances lead to an arrest does not mean that this is the correct account of what happened. It’s not unusual for those initial charges to change.
-
We don’t know the true legal circumstances of LK / RG’s residency in the house. Even MB’s lawyer is very loose about flinging around words (at one point he said that LK was “not a victim”) so I don’t put much store by his use of the “eviction” word. It could mean just that they were thinking about filing, or beginning to file, or that there was a full eviction in process.
-
We don’t know exactly why MB went to the house. Again, circumstances suggest lots of theories because of the timing just after the child protection visit. But we do not have any facts about the ‘why’ in the public domain. Did he expect to see LK? If so, did he intend to communicate with her or go there for some other reason? Or did he think no one would be at the house? We don’t know.
I could go on … but the truth is that all of the speculating and assumptions are only that.
So while the discussion is interesting, I won’t be surprised if this story goes in a completely different direction over the weeks and months to come.