vxf111: Okay, let’s hypothetically say you are right and that I was misreading all of our written and verbal conversations. Let’s also go with the hypothetical idea that she is a more knowledgeable, experienced horsewoman who must know far more than I myself do and has made many transactions over her life time. If that is the case and what I am stating is wrong, then why wouldn’t she have corrected me instead of having us do everything we did and invite us down WITH the trailer?
You want to accuse me of not comprehending, but other posters all through this thread like the poster below have corrected and pointed things out to each other and the only ones blowing through everyone are those being aggressively supportive when it is not necessary. You want to assume a lot and regardless of how you feel, she and I know the truth. None of what is going on here or what she is doing on her Facebook is going to make a difference in what happened. I do think it is a good reminder lesson though.
[QUOTE=Cindyg;8100411]
You guys who are so quick to assume the OP is nuts and evil, if it happened to you, just exactly how it happened to PO, I think you’d be ticked off too. And I think you’d feel free to vent online if you were a venting-online sort of person.
I cannot understand why the giver encouraged the receiver to bring a trailer and set up the boarding situation if she wasn’t already sure about the receiving family. The time to evaluate them was BEFORE they drove down with the kids and the trailer.
The giver was in the power position. She could have checked references, or made them send a video of the pony’s future home, or made them send a video of the children around their current horse, or asked for proof of employment, or had Mom fly down without the kids (and the trailer). She could have asked for anything she wanted.
She certainly should have made the contract available before they came down.
But she didn’t. She invited them to drive down with the kids and the trailer.
If she didn’t think they could afford the pony, she should have asked about that before they came down.
If she thought the pony was too good to give away, she should have thought about that before they came down.
If she didn’t think the pony should go to a special needs child, she should have thought about that before they came down.
If she wanted to sell the tack with the pony, she should have thought of that before they came down.
I don’t get it. I think the giver is very flaky.
Regardless of what the OP might have failed to anticipate, I think the giver was very flaky.[/QUOTE]
I will say that I am greatful for the people here on Chronicles of the Horse. While I have extensive riding knowledge and a lengthy amount of experience in other areas of the horse world, I am inexperienced in some areas and always looking to learn the best way of doing things and love asking questions. It is also good to be able share personal experiences in the hopes that it will save others the heartache you had to go through.
I think I have done enough to explain things and will bow out to allow the continued bantering of opinions over facts. If this helps someone, then it was worth it. I have also received other offers given the situation and I think it is best to get back on the horse, so to speak, and see who will work out the best for everyone involved. Once we have someone in our barn, I will post an update on who we got and how it is going. If the person wants me to share who they are in that update with a public thank you, I will do that. But I will leave that up to them.
I hope everyone has a peaceful and wonderful week ahead and wish you all, even those of you who don’t particularly care for me and have shown it, the very best. I hold no hard feelings to you or to the pony’s owner. Take care!