A WWII veteran who entered late in the war at age 18 would be 95. Hence there are not many WWII veterans still alive, much less fathering children in 2020.
For the effect of the song itâs important to use the contraction:
Mares eat oats
And does [female deer] eat oats
And liddle lambs eat ivy
A kidâll eat ivy, too
Would you?
The kidâll is crucial!
:love-struck: That made my day.
Anyone trying in multiple posts to out other postersâ IRL identities should never again use inflammatory terms like âstalkingâ when other posters copy-paste or discuss public SM posts.
Repeatedly making allusions to postersâ real names isâŠwhat is LK always sayingâŠcreepy? Please stop. It is double plus not good and destroys any claimed moral high ground, neutrality, etc. Next stop, doxxing?
FWIW, 30 years ago, that 95 year old would have been 65 and more than capable of fathering a child so your assumption of eggbuttâs age is just that, an assumption.
And does eat oats. And little lambs eat ivy.
A kidâll eat ivy too, would you?
(My dear departed Mom used to sing that)
I was responding to Morganâs statement that WWII veterans âare still capableâ of siring children. Youâre obviously right that a WWII veteran could more easily have fathered children 30 or 40 years ago, when the youngest were 55 to 65 years old.
I have NOT outed her by name. Wasnât she the one who attempted to out me by name as Laurenâs mother? Only problem being her outing was not correct.
Donât you remember that Iâm the one that numerous people keep speculating is this, that, and the next real life person?
She claims she doesnât care if her IRL identity is known. Why donât you believe her?
I DO wish you would learn to read. Here are my exact words to you YD: âI am absolutely thrilled you think you know who I might be and seriously donât care. Not one iota.â Do those words say âShe claims she doesnât care if her IRL identity is knownâ do they?? NopeâŠas always you have misinterpreted othersâ words into something you want to believe to be true.
I have no idea why you have such a morbid fascination with me and who I am. Is my identity that important to you but not the identity of others? Interesting for sure. That said, as long as you are fixated on me, you may be leaving someone else alone.
Remember yoga is a good pastime or so Iâve been told. :tickled_pink::tickled_pink::tickled_pink::tickled_pink::tickled_pink::tickled_pink::tickled_pink: Downward dog is especially relaxing and clears the mind.
So you are thrilled that I think I know who you are, but at the same time you DONâT want your anonymity broken?
Indeed, I thought that your being thrilled that I thought I knew your identity suggested that you didnât care if your IRL identity was known. It seems a bit contradictory, but thanks for clarifying.
FTR, I find all the speculating about my identity annoying.
For @YankeeDuchess, this is the first mention of Laurenâs mother on this thread. I more than likely agreed with it and somewhere along the line, I may have connected this post to you. I stopped looking further because honestly, it is tough slogging through so many of your posts! Someone else also made a reference that you might be Bertie, Bertha, Nelly or whatever you girls call yourselves, so itâs not simply me thinking you are closer to this than you want so many to believe.
I will now go back to what so many others have been able to do and thatâs scroll on by your comments. Remember, Yoga is good.
I thought @eggbutt was quite clear. She (assuming this identity is a she but maybe itâs a he or an it or whatever) doesnât really care if you know who she is. She didnât say anything about whether she cared about whether I or anyone else knows who she is. She merely stated âI am absolutely thrilled you think you know who I might be and seriously donât care. Not one iota.â
She didnât âsuggestâ anything. She didnât say anything about anyone else.
I think it might be time for you to step away from the forum and watch some âChill with Bob Ross.â I think you could strongly benefit from a happy little cloud and a baby squirrel. You can catch him on Netflix.
âWhatever you girls call yourselvesâÂ? Trying to out me as one of Laurenâs SM friends or friends in general? Wrong again.
I have NOT speculated on what your IRL identity actually is, as so many people, including you, have done with me. I genuinely wonder if people would post what they post if they did not think they were protected by anonymity. Iâm pointing out that if someone were interested in breaking the anonymity of a poster, for the major players like you, it would not be that difficult.
I find your advice that I spend time doing yoga patronizing, which is no doubt what you intended.
I hope you have better resolve in scrolling on by in the future.
It is hardly unprecedented for an elderly man to marry a much younger woman and have a child together. I didnât say it was common but it isnât impossible. Obviously anyone posting here isnât a toddler.
Itâs patronizing posts like yours that could annoy me enough to openly speculate on what her IRL identity is.
May I point out, again, that Eggbutt and others have attempted to out my identity many times. The only reason they have not succeeded is that each time theyâve been wrong.
People are obviously not talking about an agreement to accept living conditions here. They are talking about a waiver of liability because the tenants would not move out of a condemned house. Two entirely different things.
You are either not as bright as people say, or you are very cunningly trying to confuse the issue.
Has anyone here reported anyone to SafeSport? Did I ask this earlier? Maybe I dreamt the question. I wonder what is involved and what their response time is. Do they follow up with the reporter immediately or what? Iâm wondering how quickly SS responded to LKâs false accusations about MB. Was it rather quickly since she allegedly mentioned child abuse?
I was not âcunningly trying to confuse the issueâÂ, so I must be ânot as bright as people sayâÂ.
If they were living in a condemned building without his permission, and after he expressly told them to leave, I donât see why he would be liable. Furthermore, any landlord or property owner would have liability insurance.
I have no idea what was in the document, except that I doubt it was an eviction notice. But it seems likely that it will come out in the trial, as it featured in one of the police reports.
I think YD has a mission. If it is not to get threads totally shut down, it is to create as much havoc as possible. The what and why of this mission is very curious. Can be a multitude of motivating factors, but all lead back to a relationship with LK. Or a vendetta against MB or MH. Very, very interesting!
I am finding that not responding to YDâs posts is very satisfying.
When a house is condemned, ALL tenants are required to move out.